Research paper
Geometry and surface characteristics of gold nanoparticles influence their biodistribution and uptake by macrophages

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.11.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Spherical and rod-shaped gold nanoparticles with surface poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chains were characterized for size, shape, charge, poly dispersity and surface plasmon resonance. The nanoparticles were injected intravenously to 6–8-week-old female nu/nu mice bearing orthotopic ovarian tumors, and their biodistribution in vital organs was compared. Gold nanorods were taken up to a lesser extent by the liver, had longer circulation time in the blood, and higher accumulation in the tumors, compared with their spherical counterparts. The cellular uptake of PEGylated gold nanoparticles by a murine macrophage-like cell line as a function of geometry was examined. Compared to nanospheres, PEGylated gold nanorods were taken up to a lesser extent by macrophages. These studies point to the importance of gold nanoparticle geometry and surface properties on transport across biological barriers.

Graphical abstract

Compared to PEGylated gold nanospheres with slightly negative charge, near neutral PEGylated gold nanorods had increased tumor accumulation, longer circulation time in blood, less uptake by the liver and reduced interaction with serum proteins.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (180KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Advances in nanotechnology have led to the design and synthesis of organic and inorganic nanoconstructs with defined geometries, surface properties, conductivity and susceptibility to environmental stimuli such as heat and light. These constructs can take the form of nanotubes [1], nanorods [2], nanowires [3], nanocages [4], nanoshells [5], nanodisks [6] and a number of other geometries [7]. Reports are emerging that size, shape and surface properties play an important role in determining the cellular uptake and toxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian cells [8], [9], [10]. An area where nanoparticles are intensively used is in the treatment and/or diagnosis of cancers. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide and causes more deaths than any other type of female reproductive tract cancer [11]. Current standard therapy, cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy based on the combination of a platinum derivative with a taxane, results in a complete response in 70% of EOC cases. However, most patients will eventually relapse within 18 months presenting with chemoresistant disease [12]. Acquisition of platinum-resistance is a major obstacle in the long-term survival of ovarian cancer patients and invites exploration of novel therapeutic alternatives that may overcome this barrier.

One class of inorganic particles that shows promise in targeted cancer therapy including ovarian cancer is gold nanoconstructs. Gold nanoparticles have been used to deliver antitumor agents such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or paclitaxel through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect [13]. The potential of gold nanoparticles to act as non-viral-based gene delivery systems has also been explored [14], [15]. Physical and chemical properties of gold nanoparticles, in addition to their unique optical properties, make them particularly attractive for disease detection and therapy [16]. Gold nanoparticles with certain aspect ratios (e.g. rods) or compositions (spherical nanoshells) exposed to laser photoradiation can produce local heat that facilitates the destruction of diseased tissues such as solid tumors [17]. Previous studies have shown that size and surface chemistry of gold nanoparticles determine their biodistribution in non-tumor-bearing rats [18], [19]. In this study, the surface of gold nanoparticles has been modified with poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) to prolong their circulation time and facilitate functionalization among other attributes [20]. Such variations in geometry and surface properties can influence cellular uptake [21] and biodistribution. This differential uptake across biological barriers as a function of geometry and surface properties can be exploited for specific biomedical applications such as targeted therapy and/or diagnosis.

In this work, we have compared the biodistribution of commercially available PEGylated gold nanoparticles of similar size but with varying shapes and surface charge in mice bearing orthotopic ovarian tumors as an in vivo EOC model. The EOC tumors were derived from human A2780 ovarian cancer cells, which were orthotopically inoculated into the ovarian bursa of female nude mice. Orthotopic implantation allows tumor cells to interact with ovarian stromal tissue and take advantage of the rich vascularization of the ovarian environment. Ovarian tumor formation and development are highly dependent upon angiogenesis, and the expression of pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is increased in tumor development [22]. The ovarian microenvironment also allows for interaction with ovarian growth factors, signaling pathways and ECM molecules that affect tumor initiation, growth and progression. This approach recapitulates the clinical features of ovarian cancer and is thought to be a relevant EOC model. In addition to the in vivo biodistribution studies, the uptake of these nanoparticles by macrophages was evaluated.

Section snippets

Preparation and characterization of nanoparticles

PEGylated gold nanoparticles (spherical particles of 50 nm in diameter and rod-shaped particles with reported dimensions of 10 × 45 nm) were purchased from Nanopartz, Inc. (Loveland, CO, USA). Before used, gold nanoparticle samples were incubated with cell culture medium for 1 week to evaluate for potential contaminations that adversely affect cells. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using WST-1 (4-[3-(4-Iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene disulfonate) assay to ensure that the

Characterization

The physicochemical characteristics of the nanoparticles are outlined in Table 1 and representative TEM images are shown in Fig. 1. PEGylated gold nanoparticles (PEG Mw = 5000 Da) were chosen since non-PEGylated nanorods are toxic due to the presence of CTAB as a stabilizing agent. PEG is also known to improve the circulation half-life of particles and creates a steric shield, effectively preventing plasma proteins from adhering to the surface [24], [25], [26], [27]. In vitro tests conducted

Conclusions

The biodistribution of PEGylated gold nanorods and spheres of similar size, but different shapes and surface charge was evaluated in orthotopic EOC-bearing mice. Both nanoparticles accumulated to a significant extent in the liver and spleen. In all other organs studied, gold nanorods accumulated to a significantly higher extent compared to nanospheres. Rod-shaped nanoparticles had a longer circulation time in the blood and preferentially accumulated in solid tumors to a higher extent compared

Acknowledgements

We thank Yong En Sun, Shraddha Sadekar, and Erin Soisson for their assistance in animal surgery and tissue harvesting. Financial support was provided by the National Institutes of Health (R01 DE019050), the Utah Science Technology and Research (USTAR) initiative and a Catalyst Grant from the University of Utah Health Sciences Center.

References (53)

  • R.W. Jansen et al.

    Formaldehyde treated albumin contains monomeric and polymeric forms that are differently cleared by endothelial and Kupffer cells of the liver: evidence for scavenger receptor heterogeneity

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1991)
  • A. Rigotti et al.

    The class B scavenger receptors SR-BI and CD36 are receptors for anionic phospholipids

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1995)
  • Y. Choi et al.

    Biosensing with conically shaped nanopores and nanotubes

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2006)
  • S. Giri et al.

    Stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanorods capped with magnetic nanoparticles

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2005)
  • M. Ferrari

    Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2005)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Gold nanocages; engineering their structure for biomedical applications

    Adv. Mater.

    (2005)
  • L.R. Hirsch et al.

    Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2003)
  • R.O. Ryan

    Nanodisk: hydrophobic drug delivery vehicles

    Expert Opin. Drug Deliv.

    (2008)
  • B.D. Chithrani et al.

    Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells

    Nanoletters

    (2006)
  • .Y.S. Chen et al.

    Assessment of the in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles

    Nanoscale Res. Lett.

    (2009)
  • A. Nan et al.

    Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of silica nanotubes

    Nano Lett.

    (2008)
  • D.M. Parkin et al.

    Global cancer statistics, 2002

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2005)
  • R.F. Ozols

    Treatment goals in ovarian cancer

    Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer

    (2005)
  • G.F. Paciotti et al.

    Colloidal gold; a novel nanoparticle vector for tumor directed drug delivery

    Drug Deliv.

    (2004)
  • M. Thomas et al.

    Conjugation to gold nanoparticles enhances polyethylenimine’s transfer of plasmid DNA into mammalian cells

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2003)
  • A.K. Salem et al.

    Multifunctional nanorods for gene delivery

    Nat. Mater.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (458)

    • Gold nanoparticles in tissue engineering and regeneration

      2023, Gold Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text