Elsevier

Contraception

Volume 91, Issue 4, April 2015, Pages 308-312
Contraception

Original research article
Prevalence and risk factors of inadequate cervical dilation following laminaria insertion in second-trimester abortion — case control study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

The objective was to explore the prevalence of and risk factors for inadequate cervical dilation following insertion of a single set of laminaria in women scheduled for dilation & evacuation (D&E) at 14–24 weeks' gestation.

Study design

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of women who underwent pregnancy termination by D&E at 14–24 weeks’ gestation between January 2003 and December 2013. All cases in which the surgical procedure was cancelled due to failure to achieve adequate cervical dilation after a single set of laminaria inadequate cervical dilation were included. The control group was women who underwent D&E following adequate cervical dilation after a single set of laminaria, and were matched according to gestational week in a ratio of 1:3.

Results

The overall dilation failure rate was 3.2%, with 4.0% among the induced-abortion patients and 1.5% among the patients with fetal demise (p=.002). Patients who had inadequate cervical dilation had lower rates of gravidity (p=.002) and previous spontaneous vaginal delivery (p<.001), along with higher rates of primigravidity, nulliparity (p<.001), previous cesarean section/s (p=.041), previous abdominal surgeries (p=.001) and previous cervical procedures (p=.003), compared to controls. A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed two risk factors for inadequate cervical dilation following laminaria insertion, namely, previous cesarean section (p=.002) and previous cervical procedure (p<.001), whereas increased gravidity was found to protect against inadequate cervical dilation (p=.002).

Conclusions

Previous cesarean section/s, cervical procedures and primigravidity were found to be risk factors for failure to achieve adequate cervical dilation after a single set of laminaria. Women who are scheduled for D&E, and in whom one of these risk factors exists, might benefit from additional interventions to achieve better cervical preparation.

Introduction

Abortion during the second trimester of pregnancy accounts for 10%–15% of abortions performed worldwide [1], [2]. Pregnancies most commonly are terminated in the second trimester by induction of labor or dilation and evacuation (D&E). D&E generally is the preferred method when skilled providers and facilities are available because it is safe, cost effective and efficient [3].

Late second-trimester abortion by D&E is associated with low complication rate. A Cochrane review that compared surgical and medical methods used for inducing abortion in second-trimester pregnancy with regard to efficacy, side effects, adverse effects and acceptability found that D&E is superior to instillation of prostaglandin F2α, mifepristone and misoprostol [3]. D&E was found to be safe in the presence of placenta previa [4], multiple pregnancies [5] and scarred uterus [6], [7].

Preoperative preparation of the cervix is recommended before surgical evacuation of second-trimester pregnancies [8]. The cervix may be prepared with osmotic dilators, pharmacologic agents or both. The most common method for second-trimester D&E is by overnight laminaria placement [9]. Retrospective studies have shown that use of osmotic dilators such as laminaria tents decreases the risk of cervical laceration and uterine perforation [10]. The minimal dilation required depends on the type of instrument and gestational age [11]. Cervical preparation for D&E is deemed essential at 14weeks’ gestation and beyond [12], [13] and can be achieved through the use of pharmacologic agents, osmotic dilators and Foley balloon catheters [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

Osmotic dilators exist in three main forms: laminaria tents, Lamicel TM, and Dilapan-STM. Laminaria tents are dried, compressed seaweed stems that absorb fluid and gradually expand, providing both mechanical dilation and dilation from endogenous prostaglandin release [21], thus making adjunctive manual dilation easier. Laminaria absorb fluid within the cervix and swell to about three to four times their original diameter. Most of this dilation occurs within the first 6h, with the maximum effect occurring in 12 to 24h. Reports regarding laminaria use date back to 1862, giving laminaria a long record of successful dilation with an excellent safety profile [22], [23].

Occasionally, the internal os of the uterine cervix fails to dilate following a single set of laminaria insertion. These cases usually are diagnosed during the D&E procedure. Many surgeons would not cancel the D&E but instead would mechanically dilate the cervix or place a set of Dilapan and do the case later in the day. Some providers schedule the patients who may not have received an adequate number of dilators for gestational duration to come in early on the operative day to remove the dilators to assess the cervix. If the cervix is too closed and/or too noncompliant, they then place an additional set of dilators and/or use adjuvant misoprostol before taking the patient to the operation room either for later that day or for a subsequent day. Although used for many decades, studies of cervical preparation offer few data about success of cervical preparation with different patient characteristics. Therefore, the current study aims to explore the prevalence and potential risk factors for inadequate dilation.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The gynecologic department in Assaf Harofeh Medical Center is a tertiary referral center for D&E. All the women admitted for second-trimester pregnancy termination undergo ultrasonographic evaluation prior to laminaria insertion for fetal biometry measurements as well as placental location. The medical charts of these women are stored in a computerized database.

The inclusion criteria of the study group were singleton pregnancies at 14–24 weeks of gestation on the preprocedure day. Multiple

Results

A total of 2233 medical records of women undergoing pregnancy termination were identified in our hospital computerized database, either due to induced abortion (1500 women, 67.2% of the study population) or missed abortion (733 women, 32.8% of the study population) by D&E at 14–24 weeks’ gestation between January 2003 and December 2013. There were no missing records. The overall dilation failure rate was 3.2% (n= 71), with 4.0% (n= 60) among the induced abortion patients versus 1.5% (n= 11) among

Discussion

The current study aimed to investigate the prevalence and potential risk factors for inadequate cervical dilation following laminaria insertion. This complication is usually diagnosed during the D&E procedure, following the extraction of the laminaria tents by the surgeon, and once it occurs, there is a need to cancel the procedure. Depending upon logistics and capacity, the surgeon might reinsert another set of laminaria and postpone the surgical procedure or insert a second set of osmotic

References (33)

  • D.J. Lyell

    Adhesions and perioperative complications of repeat cesarean delivery

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2011)
  • E.A. Drey et al.

    Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21-23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial

    Contraception

    (2014)
  • R. Lyus et al.

    Outcomes with same-day cervical preparation with Dilapan-S osmotic dilators and vaginal misoprostol before dilatation and evacuation at 18 to 21+6 weeks' gestation

    Contraception

    (2013)
  • S.J. Newmann et al.

    Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2010)
  • Medical methods for termination of pregnancy. Report of a WHO Scientific Group

    World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser

    (1997)
  • P.A. Lohr et al.

    Surgical versus medical methods for second trimester induced abortion

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2008)
  • Cited by (1)

    • Cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in women with a scarred uterus: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies

      2016, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two authors (M.A. and J.A.L.) were involved in identifying the eligible manuscripts; 176 were initially identified, of which 106 were excluded, after screening the title and abstract, as not being relevant to the aims of the metaanalysis. The texts of the remaining 70 manuscripts were fully reviewed,4,5,8-75 from which case reports or case series with <5 patients (n = 12),45,46,54-59,61,62,66,67 reviews (n = 4),49,50,53,74 and a letter to the editor (n = 1)64 were further excluded. We also excluded non-English-language articles (n = 4)44,48,68,70 because it has been shown that exclusion of such articles has little effect on summary treatment estimates.76

    1

    Part of this publication was performed in partial fulfillment of the MD thesis requirements of the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

    View full text