Behavior and Cognitive Therapy Today

Behavior and Cognitive Therapy Today

Selected Proceedings of the XXVII Congress of the European Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, Venice 1997
1998, Pages 279-288
Behavior and Cognitive Therapy Today

22 - In Vivo Exposure for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia: Does a Cognitive Rationale Enhance Treatment Efficacy?

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043437-7/50023-5Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter discusses whether a cognitive rationale enhances the efficacy of in vivo exposure. Clark's cognitive theory of panic suggests that a cognitive rationale should be more effective than a deconditioning rationale in treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA). Contrary to expectation, the results of the studies uniformly fail to support the superiority of the cognitive rationale; the efficacy of in vivo exposure did not differ as a function of the type of rationale that patients received. Regardless of whether a cognitive or deconditioning rationale was given, patients achieved reductions in panic frequency, worry about panic, general anxiety, fear of arousal-related bodily sensations, and agoraphobic avoidance. The percentage of panic-free patients at 3-month follow-up was roughly equal in both conditions, and similar to that found in other studies. The efficacy of in vivo exposure therapy was not influenced by whether patients received a cognitive or a deconditioning rationale. Various CBT (cognitive-behavioral therapy) packages for PDA are roughly equal in efficacy; cognitive restructuring, in vivo exposure, and interoceptive exposure all seem to produce roughly the same results across a variety of symptom domains.

References (0)

Cited by (0)

View full text