Mycobacteria
Oxazolidinones, a new class of synthetic antituberculosis agent in vitro and in vivo activities of DuP-721 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(91)90002-WGet rights and content

Abstract

Dl-S-n-(3-(4-acetyl)-2-oxo-5-oxazolidynyl methyl) acetamide (DuP-721) is an orally active representative of the oxazolidinone series of antimicrobials. At concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 4 μg/ml, DuP-721 inhibited equally the strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptible and resistant to conventional antituberculosis drugs. DuP-721 inhibited M. gordonae and M. fortuitum at 3.9 μg/ml, M. kansasii at 1.95, and M. scrofulaceum at 15.6 μg/ml. It was not active against M. avium and M. intracellulare at concentrations of 250 μg/ml. The inhibition of the metabolism of M. tuberculosis as indicated by the liquid scintillation radiometric method was 56% at fourfold the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of DuP-721 that compared well to that of the fourfold MIC concentrations of rifampicin and isoniazid. The in vitro activity of DuP-721 was not affected by reducing the pH from 6.8 to 5.5. In mice infected with M. tuberculosis, the 50% effective dose (ED50) for DuP-721 was 13.2 mg/kg when administered daily beginning 4 hr postinfection for 17 days. The ED50 was 71.8 mg/kg when DuP-721 was administered only on days 11 and 12 postinfection. A 100% survival rate was obtained at 50 and 160 mg/kg when DuP-721 was administered daily for 17 days, and only on days 11 and 12 after the infection, respectively. The increase in the survival time by DuP-721 at 100 mg/kg (eightfold the ED50 dose) when administered daily for 17 days beginning 4 hr after infection was inferior to that by eightfold the ED50 dose of rifampicin and isoniazid administered on days 11 and 12 postinfection. These results indicate that DuP-721 is protective against M. tuberculosis infection in mice, and further investigations with other compounds belonging to the oxazolidinone series are warranted.

References (16)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (88)

  • Current advances in the clinical development of anti-tubercular agents

    2020, Tuberculosis
    Citation Excerpt :

    It has shown low rates of emergence to resistant mutant genes, and excellent oral and parenteral bioavailability [28,29]. Linezolid possesses robust effectiveness in treating MDR-TB and paved the way for further oxazolidinones for the treatment of MDR-TB [27,30–33]. Clinical experience with linezolid in TB is scary, as toxicity is a major concern for a drug that has to be used for a longer time.

  • Repurposing nonantibiotic drugs as antibacterials

    2020, Drug Discovery Targeting Drug-Resistant Bacteria
  • Combinatory activity of linezolid and levofloxacin with antituberculosis drugs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    2018, Tuberculosis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another critical factor observed in our drugs combination study was that no antagonism was observed among the tested drugs. In vivo and in vitro studies have already shown bactericidal activity of the fluoroquinolones class and also by LNZ against M. tuberculosis [3,11–14] and that synergistic or even antagonistic activity of a specific drugs combination against a particular microorganism is not merely a property of each drug, also depending on the dose of each drug in the combination [2,3,13]. The pharmacodynamics of INH and RIF differ among themselves, since INH has concentration dependent activity, while RIF is time dependent.

  • Black brown discoloration and hairy tongue – A rare linezolid side effect

    2017, Indian Journal of Tuberculosis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Linezolid is classified as group 5 drug for the management of drug resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) by WHO. Linezolid exhibits in vitro bacteriostatic activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, with a minimum inhibitory concentration of less than 1 μg per milliliter.4–7 It is well-tolerated with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and headache being the most commonly reported side effects.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text