Article
Chaos theory and the evolution of consciousness and mind: A thermodynamic-holographic resolution to the mind-body problem

https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-118X(94)00047-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This address describes Neurological Positivism's (NP) energetic evolution of consciousness, mind, and the brain-mind relationship within a model that integrates ideas and research from chaos theory, Pribram's holonomic brain theory, evolutionary theory, and the laws of thermodynamics (the energy laws The energetic evolution and encapsulation of space-time consciousness from chaotic-holographic environments is described. Consciousness is described as a natural evolutionary space-time template of continuously generated self-referential energy patterns (algorithms). The energetic evolution of mind is described as a natural self-referential exteriorization of the algorithmic organization of consciousness in the form of culturally shared mental models. It is proposed that the brain-mind energy relationship has historically undergone and continues to undergo change, and that this change is a natural thermodynamic arrow that constitutes the evolution of culture. That is, the evolution of culture proceeds in the direction of progressively more complete and efficient exteriorizations of the algorithmic organization of the brain-thus, for example, the recent evolution of brain-like computing systems and virtual reality systems. Accordingly, an uneven, but closing, central-energy-state identity (self-similarity) between brain and mind is described. It is concluded that NP's conception of mind helps us understand the evolutionary unfoldment of culture, and provides a sense of direction as to its future.

References (54)

  • R. Abraham et al.

    A visual introduction to dynamical systems theory for psychology

    (1990)
  • R. Ackoff et al.

    Scientific method: Optimizing applied research and decisions

    (1962)
  • P.W. Atkins

    The second law

    (1984)
  • E.T. Bell

    Men of mathematics

    (1937)
  • L.von. Bertalanffy

    The mind-body problem: A new view

    Psychosomatic Medicine

    (1964)
  • L.von. Bertalanffy

    Robots, men and minds: Psychology in the modern world

    (1967)
  • L.von. Bertalanffy

    General system theory

    (1968)
  • D. Bohm

    Quantum theory as an indication of a new order in physics. Part B. Implicate and explicate order in physical law

    Foundations of Physics

    (1973)
  • D. Bohm et al.

    Science, order, and creativity

    (1987)
  • N. Bohr

    Atomic theory and the description of nature

    (1934)
  • L. Boltzmann

    The second law of thermodynamics

    (1905)
  • L. Boltzmann

    Theoretical physics and philosophical problems

    (1974)
  • E. Boring

    A history of experimental psychology

    (1950)
  • D.T. Campbell

    Methodological suggestions from a comparative psychology of knowledge process

    Inquiry

    (1959)
  • D.T. Campbell

    Evolutionary epistemology

  • J. Crutchfield et al.

    Chaos

    Scientific American

    (1986, December)
  • J.A. Fodor

    The mind-body problem

    Scientific American

    (1981, January)
  • A. Gevins

    Signs of model making by the human brain

  • J. Gleick

    Chaos: The making of a new science

    (1987)
  • S. Hawking

    A brief history of time

    (1988)
  • N. Herbert

    Quantum reality

    (1985)
  • D. Hofstadter

    Gödel, Escher, Bach: The eternal golden braid

    (1979)
  • G. Holton

    Constructing a theory: Einstein's model

    The American Scholar

    (1979)
  • W. James

    The principles of psychology

    (1890)
  • M. Johnson

    The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason

    (1987)
  • A. Koestler

    The act of creation

    (1964)
  • K. Lorenz

    Kant's doctrine of the a priori in light of contemporary biology

  • Cited by (42)

    • A unitary Neo-Piagetian/Neo-Eriksonian model of development: Fundamental assumptions and meta-issues

      2012, New Ideas in Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of process, I elaborated the concept of fractalization to include the environment and not only the developing individual. Vandervert (1991, 1992, 1995a, 1995b) had maintained that there is a homotopic isomorphism over the domains of the world, brain, and mind in terms of fractals. I indicated that the common metric in this regard might be activation-inhibition coordination and that parents serve as buffers this way, at least when parenting well, for example, by damping the flow of activations and inhibitions in the environment to coordinate them better for the child.

    • Vietnam Dynasty and Sandpile Modeling

      2024, Communications in Computer and Information Science
    • The Complexity of Human Thought

      2022, The Complexity of Human Thought
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    I gratefully acknowledge the many helpful comments and encouragements over the past several years of Allan Combs, Professsor of Psychology, University of North Carolina-Asheville, and of Paul D. MacLean, Senior Research Scientist, National Institute of Mental Health. This article was presented in an invited paper at the 1993 National Convention of the American Psychological Association, Division 24, Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology.

    View full text