Fifty-year biogeochemical effects of green ash, white pine, and Norway spruce in a replicated experiment

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(91)90088-DGet rights and content

Abstract

Few long-term, replicated experiments are available to provide information on the effects of tree species on soil chemistry and ecosystem biogeochemistry. We examined replicated, 50-year-old plots of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh), white pine (Pinus strobus L.), and Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] that had been planted in an abandoned agricultural field. The pHwater of the 0–5-cm soil layer under green ash was 4.6, compared with 4.2 under white pine and 3.8 under Norway spruce. The Norway spruce soil was substantially less-well buffered against further acidification than the soil under green ash, and contained less than half the quantity of exchangeable Ca2+ + Mg2+ + K+ in the 0–15-cm depth. The decline in these cations under Norway spruce was accompanied by higher concentrations of exchangeable Al3+. The most important factor in the lower pH under Norway spruce was the greater acid strength of the soil organic matter, with a secondary role played by the higher saturation of the exchange complex with aluminum. Nitrogen mineralization in resin cores averaged 40 kg/ha under green ash, 84 kg/ha under white pine, and 56 kg/ha under Norway spruce. The only significant difference in litterfall biomass and chemistry was a greater content of aluminum and lower content of magnesium in litterfall in the Norway spruce plots relative to green ash plots. These major biogeochemical differences between tree species demonstrate the need for replicated experiments for assessing the mechanisms that drive long-term changes in ecosystems relative to differing species, management regimes, and atmospheric deposition.

References (22)

  • J. Krzak et al.

    Photosynthesis, nutrient, growth and soil investigations of a declining Norway spruce (Picea abies) stand in the Coastal Region of Northern Germany

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (1988)
  • D.H. Alban

    Effects of nutrient accumulation by aspen, spruce, and pine on soil properties

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1982)
  • D. Binkley

    Soil acidity in loblolly pine stands with interval burning

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1986)
  • D. Binkley et al.

    The components of nitrogen availability assessments in forest soils

    Adv. Soil Sci.

    (1989)
  • D. Binkley et al.

    Acidification of soils in mixtures of conifers and red alder

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1990)
  • D. Binkley et al.

    An empirical analysis of the factors contributing to 20-year decrease in soil pH in an old-field plantation of loblolly pine

    Biogeochemistry

    (1989)
  • A.H.F. Brown et al.

    Effects of tree mixtures on earthworm populations and nitrogen and phosphorus status in Norway spruce (Picea abies) stands

  • J. Carlyle et al.

    Larch litter and nitrogen availability in mixed larch-spruce stands. II. A comparison of larch and spruce litters as a nitrogen source for Sitka spruce seedlings

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1986)
  • D. Challinor

    Alteration of surface soil characteristics by four tree species

  • D. Challinor

    Alteration of surface soil characteristics by four tree species

    Ecology

    (1968)
  • E.A. France et al.

    Twenty-seven years of soil change under four tree species in southern Ontario

    Can. J. For. Res.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (198)

    • Litter quality and microtopography as key drivers to topsoil properties and understorey plant diversity in ancient broadleaved forests on decalcified marl

      2019, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Litter quality may also affect habitat factors such as pH and soil moisture, which are important to plant diversity (Ellenberg et al., 1974). In tree plantations and common garden experiments, pH values of the topsoil usually decrease under trees with low-degradable litter, due to retarded decomposition and production of organic acids (e.g., Binkley and Valentine, 1991; Neirynck et al., 2000; Aubert et al., 2004; Mueller et al., 2012). Under trees with high-degradable litter, however, pH values may be relatively high, possibly because the trees retrieve base cations from deeper soil layers by the roots (Duvigneaud and Denayer-De, 1970; Mohr and Topp, 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text