Elsevier

Journal of Econometrics

Volume 43, Issues 1–2, January–February 1990, Pages 213-226
Journal of Econometrics

Is the size distribution of income a random walk?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90117-CGet rights and content

Abstract

This paper explores the hypothesis that the size distribution of income follows a random walk, models with and without trend are analyzed. Using Current Population Report data we find evidence of such a phenomenon which calls into question our current redistributive policy strategies.

References (28)

  • Charles M. Beach

    Cyclical impacts on the distribution of income

    Queen's University discussion paper no. 130

    (1973)
  • A. Blinder et al.

    Macroeconomic activity and income distribution in the post war U.S.

    Review of Economics and Statistics

    (1978)
  • F.A. Cowell

    Measuring inequality

    (1977)
  • D. Dickey et al.

    Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1979)
  • David T. Ellwood et al.

    Poverty in America: Is welfare the answer or the problem?

  • Evans, G.B.A. and N.E. Savin, Testing for unit roots: 2 Econometrica 52,...
  • W. Fuller

    Introducing to statistical time series

    (1976)
  • C. Gini

    Variabilità e mutabilità

    (1913)
  • Peter Gottschalk et al.

    Macroeconomic conditions income transfers and the trend in poverty

  • Peter Gottschalk et al.

    A framework for evaluating the effects of economic growth and transfers on poverty

    American Economic Review

    (1985)
  • Edward M. Gramlich

    The distributional effects of higher unemployment

    Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

    (1974)
  • K.J. Hayes

    U.S. federal redistributive income policies

  • N. Kakwani

    On a class of poverty measures

    Econometrica

    (1980)
  • N. Kakwani

    Income inequality and poverty

    (1980)
  • Cited by (12)

    • Inequality and business cycles in the U.S. and European union countries

      1999, International Advances in Economic Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors would like to thank Richard Porter and Tony Shorrocks for helpful comments. The usual caveat holds.

    View full text