Freshwater contents and heat budgets of James Bay and Hudson Bay

https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(84)90007-4Get rights and content

Abstract

The freshwater and heat budgets of James Bay and Hudson Bay showed that for a yearly cycle the annual ice cover and runoff are major and equal components of the freshwater budgets. James Bay has a baywide freshwater layer thickness of 6.25 m, while Hudson Bay has a 4.7 m layer; these represent summer residence times of 10 months and 4.1 years, respectively.

The heat budget results indicated that the incoming surface heat flux is mainly balanced by the heat required to melt the seasonal ice cover and bring the water temperature up to the observed summer values. Thus, an assessment of hydroelectric developments in the surrounding watersheds should not only investigate the changes that will occur in the marine environment, but also in the seasonal ice cover, as they together determine the oceanic climate pattern of the two bays.

References (11)

  • BoyceF.M. et al.

    Heat content of Lake Ontario and estimates of average surface heat fluxes during IFYGL

  • Canadian Government

    Ice summary and analysis, Hudson Bay and approaches

    (1964–1979)
  • Canadian Government

    Monthly Records, Meteorological observations in Canada

    Environment Canada, Atmospheric Environment, Downsview, Ontario

    (1975)
  • Canadian and Manitoba Governments

    Lake Winnipeg, Churchill and Nelson Rivers Study Board Technical Report

    (1971–1975)
  • DanielsonE.W.

    The surface heat budget of Hudson Bay

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (57)

  • Storm-driven hydrography of western Hudson Bay

    2021, Continental Shelf Research
  • Dinoflagellate cyst production over an annual cycle in seasonally ice-covered Hudson Bay

    2016, Marine Micropaleontology
    Citation Excerpt :

    On account of the circulation pattern and the substantial input from rivers draining into James Bay, freshwater accumulates in the southeastern and eastern parts of the corridor (Granskog et al., 2011). Hence, even though both of our study sites lie within the freshwater-dominated coastal zone, salinities are higher and summer surface mixed layer depth lower in the west than in the east (Anderson and Roff, 1980; Prinsenberg, 1984; Ferland et al., 2011; Lapoussière et al., 2013). Furthermore, during the open-water season the southeastern region around trap site AN03 is often the warmest region in Hudson Bay (see Suppelementary Table 1)(Galbraith and Larouche, 2011).

  • Surface sediment dinoflagellate cysts from the Hudson Bay system and their relation to freshwater and nutrient cycling

    2014, Marine Micropaleontology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Main contributing rivers are the Nelson River (94.4 km3 a− 1) in the southeast and the Great Whale River (80.5 km3 a− 1) in the southwest of the Bay, along with the rivers discharging into James Bay (262 km3 a− 1) (Déry et al., 2011). The collective yield of 760 km3 a− 1 of river water induces a distinct haline stratification that is strengthened in spring and summer by sea-ice melt of ca. 1.5 m (Prinsenberg, 1984, 1988; Galbraith and Larouche, 2011; Granskog et al., 2011). Importantly, the river inflow is contained in a counter-clockwise circulation gyre along the perimeter of the Bay (Prinsenberg, 1986b; Saucier et al., 2004), leading to limited transfer of river water and associated properties from the coastal corridor into the interior of the Bay (Granskog et al., 2009, 2011; St-Laurent et al., 2011).

  • Late-summer zooplankton community structure, abundance, and distribution in the Hudson Bay system (Canada) and their relationships with environmental conditions, 2003-2006

    2012, Progress in Oceanography
    Citation Excerpt :

    The region is characterized by large freshwater input from surrounding rivers (Déry et al., 2005, 2011) and also by the seasonal formation and melting of sea-ice over most of the region (Prinsenberg, 1984), which give it the estuary-like, two–layer circulation pattern separated by a strong pycnocline located between 5 and 25 m (Roff and Legendre, 1986). The large riverine input circulates cyclonically in the surface layer of HB, which is characterized by fresher and less dense waters than those entering between Southampton and Coats islands in the northwest part of HB (Prinsenberg, 1984). The fresh surface waters mix with the numerous local river plumes and slowly circle the bay before exiting by the southern shore of HS towards the Labrador Sea (Pett and Roff, 1982; Saucier et al., 2004).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text