Choosing who shall not be treated in the NHS
References (18)
- et al.
The Cardiff Health Survey. The relationship between smoking habits and beliefs in the elderly
Publ. Hlth
(1988) Risk-targetting: the application of epidemiological data to problems of resource allocation in insurance based health care systems
National Health Service Act 1977
(1981)Disaster preparedness
South. med. J.
(1983)Assessment of injury severity: the Triage Index
Crit. Care Med.
(1980)Low risk of thrombosis and serious embolic events despite low-intensity anticoagulation
Circulation
(1988)- et al.
A comparison of methods to predict mortality of intensive care unit patients
Crit. Care Med.
(1987) Predicting deaths among intensive care unit patients
Crit. Care Med.
(1988)Patient selection for intensive care: a comparison of New Zealand and United States hospitals
Crit. Care Med.
(1988)
Cited by (88)
Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent
2015, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :Eight suggest that respondents tend to favour individuals with low SES over those with high SES. The other two suggest that people's SES had little effect on priority setting (Charny et al., 1989; Linley and Hughes, 2013). Other attributes were explored by a relatively small number of studies, including having dependents, marital status, employment status, gender, indigenous people, QoL after treatment, treatment potential, rarity of disease, lifetime QALYs (i.e., health from a specific time to death), past QALYs (i.e., health experienced up to now), and past QoL (i.e., QoL of all the past years).
Patient prioritization in medical emergencies: An ethical analysis
2012, Revista da Associacao Medica BrasileiraSex, self-interest and health care priorities
2012, Journal of Socio-EconomicsCitation Excerpt :Equivalent results were reported for characteristics such as education level, sexual orientation, drug use, economic value and religious disposition. UK studies have observed that, inter alia, more-deprived people are more likely to prioritise care for the more-deprived (Charny et al., 1989), whilst people with children are more likely to prioritise interventions for children (Bowling, 1996). In spite of widespread support for prioritising the young over the old in principle, most elderly people, when asked, are not willing to surrender to younger people their own places on a treatment waiting list (Bowling et al., 2002; Mariotto et al., 1999).
Economic evaluation of services for a National Health Scheme: The case for a fairness-based framework
2007, Journal of Health EconomicsThe National Health Service (NHS) in 'crisis': the role played by a shift from horizontal to vertical principles of equity
2020, Health Economics, Policy and Law
- ∗
Present address: Bath District Health Authority, New-bridge Hill, Bath BA1 3QE, England.