Caribbean cruise tourism: A business of transnational partnerships
References (8)
Caribbean Cruise Ship Study
(1988)Caribbean Cruise Ship Study, Washington DC
(1988)Caribbean Cruise Ship Study, Washington DC
(1988)The Cruise Book: from Brochure to Bon Voyage
Cited by (45)
The global cruise industry: Financial performance evaluation
2022, Research in Transportation Business and ManagementCitation Excerpt :Financial empirical research on cruise shipping remains surprisingly thin. Few earlier studies investigate, selectively, topics such as, the translational partnership organization of the industry (Hall & Braithwaite, 1990); cruise impact on and implications for regional and local market development (Hobson, 1993); cruise market globalization trends (Wood, 2000); cruise strategic capacity investments (Byung-Wook, 2005; Wie, 2005); cruise line and passenger challenges (Veronneau & Roy, 2012); cruise line supply chains and logistics (Daly & Fernandez-Stark, 2017; Veronneau & Roy, 2009, 2011; Veronneau, Roy, & Beaulieu, 2015); fund raising approaches for newbuilding cruise ships (Kiziellewicz, 2017; OECD, 2007); and mergers, acquisitions and restructurings (Charlier, 2004; Hobson, 1994); inter alia. This study focuses on the financial performance evaluation of the global cruise business and attempts to fill this research gap in the field by contributing a set of challenging and innovative findings, as well as managerial implications and recommendations.
Retracing the past, comprehending the present and contemplating the future of cruise tourism through a meta-analysis of journal publications
2019, Marine PolicyCitation Excerpt :Several researchers (e.g. Refs. [50,81,82,86,88,107–111] examined the attributes of ports of call as cruise ship destination. Eventually, the findings of the current study revealed recurring cruise ship tourism research areas such as cruise passenger expenditure and spending patterns (e.g. Ref. [49]; Brida, Bukstein & Tealde [135]; [112–116], the role of effective governance and strong stakeholder cooperation for sustainable cruise ship tourism (e.g. Refs. [8,11,30,117,118], and host communities' attitude towards cruise ship tourism (e.g. Refs. [48,76–78] along with a wide range of themes outlined under Table 2. * Other themes include: Traditional knowledge and capitalism-integration via cruise tourism, Costs involved in cruise tourism, Crisis management in cruise tourism, children's cruising experience, cruise lines and their suppliers, corporate social responsibility in cruising, controlling guest movement via onboard live music performance, cruise liners length of stay, customer compliant in cruise line, sexual crimes on cruise ships, seasonality of cruise tourism, cruise passengers' decision making process, revenue management in the cruise line industry, oligarchy nature of cruise industry, cruise tourism and neo-colonialism, timeshare and cruise tourism, politics and cruise tourism.
Cuba in transition: Tourism industry perceptions of entrepreneurial change
2015, Tourism ManagementCitation Excerpt :Of course this is not the first Caribbean island to invest in tourism as an important part of its economy, and the negative impacts of that investment are well-documented (Ramón Rodrı́guez, 2002; Wilkinson, 1999). Large-scale mass tourism has led to environmental degradation, economic inequality, and cultural erosion; indeed the literature documenting tourism's negative effects span nearly four decades (Anfuso, Williams, Cabrera Hernández, & Pranzini, 2014; De Albuquerque & McElroy, 1999; Hall & Braithwaite, 1990; Hills & Lundgren, 1977; Holder, 1989; Pattullo, 1996). Much is being done in Cuba to minimize the potential negative effects of mass tourism, primarily through close oversight by the government creating a unique public-private enterprise.
Analysis of the labour force composition on cruisers: The Danube through Central and Southeast Europe
2014, Journal of Transport GeographyCitation Excerpt :More recently, publications focus on the investigation of different factors that influence decision making process and choice of cruising company such as loyalty (Li and Petrick, 2008; Petrick and Sirakaya, 2004), price sensitivity (Petrick, 2005), service quality, value and satisfaction of cruisers (e.g. Armenski et al., 2009; Duman and Mattila, 2005; Gabe et al., 2006; Jaakson, 2004; Petrick, 2003, 2004) or segmentation of the cruise passengers based on their perceptions of a cruise line’s reputation (Petrick, 2011). The economic impact and benefits of the cruising tourism have been researched by a large number of authors (Braun et al., 2002; Brida and Aguire, 2008; Chase and Alon, 2002; Dragin et al., 2006, 2007, 2008, 2010; Dwyer and Forsyth, 1996, 1998; Mescon and Vosikis, 1985; Foster, 1986; Hall and Braithwaite, 1990; Hobson and Perry, 1993; Henthorne, 2000; Ivkov et al., 2007; Larsen et al., 2013; Veronneau and Roy, 2009). Dwyer and Forsyth (1998) developed a framework for assessing the economic impacts of cruise tourism for a nation and its sub-regions (impacts and net benefits).
No port stands alone: PortMiami and the resilience of its Caribbean and Mesoamerican maritime network
2024, Maritime Economics and LogisticsWater Transport and Tourism
2023, Advances in Spatial Science