A comparison of two methods of estimating a common risk difference in a stratified analysis of a multicenter clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(94)90017-5Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we compare two methods of estimating the difference between the proportion of adverse events in a test treatment group and the proportion of adverse events in a control treatment group in a multicenter clinical trial. We used simulated data to compare the bias and mean squared error of the weighted least squares estimator to the bias and mean squared error of the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel estimator. We also computed the coverage probabilities for confidence intervals derived from these estimators. We found that the weighted least squares method was often seriously biased. The coverage probabilities for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel estimators were often closer to their nominal values than were the coverage probabilities for the weighted least squares estimators. It also was found that these methods require a larger sample size to maintain coverage probabilities near their nominal values when unequal numbers of persons are assigned to the test and control treatments.

References (12)

  • R DerSimonian et al.

    Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials

    Controlled Clinical Trials

    (1986)
  • N Mantel et al.

    Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1959)
  • MC Sheps

    Shall we count the living or the dead?

    New Engl J Med

    (1958)
  • DG Kleinbaum et al.

    Epidemiologic Research

    (1982)
  • JE Grizzle et al.

    Analysis of categorical data by linear models

    Biometrics

    (1969)
  • S Greenland et al.

    Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data

    Biometrics

    (1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

This work was partially supported by grant CA39065 and grant MH46011 from the U.S. Public Health Service.

View full text