Mechanism of the body weight increase induced by systemic sulpiride

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(89)90427-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Long-term intraperitoneal administration of sulpiride induced body weight increase in female but not in male rats. The hypothesis that systemic sulpiride causes an endocrine unbalance which in turn causes body weight gain and hyperphagia was tested in four experiments. First, it was shown that even when they are on a high-fat diet male rats do not show body weight gain induced by systemic sulpiride. Second, sulpiride suppressed the estrous cycle. Third, gonadectomy prevented the body weight gain induced by systemic sulpiride in female rats. Fourth, estradiol simultaneously administered with sulpiride prevented the expected sulpiride-induced body weight gain. These results are discussed in terms of an hypothetical functional castration produced by systemic sulpiride. The well known hyperprolactinemia, induced by the pituitary D2 dopamine receptor blockade, might bring about an impairment of the steroidogenesis with subsequent decrease in estrogens level, which in turn might be responsible for the hyperphagia and body weight increase induced by systemic injections of sulpiride.

References (41)

  • N.B. Schwartz

    A model for the regulation of ovulation in the rat

  • J.C. Stoof et al.

    Two dopamine receptors:biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology

    Life Sci.

    (1984)
  • M.F. Tarttelin et al.

    Variations in food and water intake in the normal and acyclic female rat

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1971)
  • G.N. Wade et al.

    Gonadal effects on food intake and adiposity: A metabolic hypothesis

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1979)
  • C. Wang et al.

    Prolactin inhibition of estrogen production by cultured rat granulosa cells

    Mol. Cell Endocrinol.

    (1980)
  • A.S. Alam et al.

    Bioavailability of [14C] sulpiride in dogs

    Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther.

    (1979)
  • A. Benakis et al.

    Localization, distribution, elimination and metabolism of 14C-sulpiride in rats

    Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.

    (1976)
  • A. Benekis et al.

    Étude autoradiographique du sulpiride 14C chez la souris et le rat. Localisation spécifique au niveau de l'hypophyse du rat aprés admnistration unique et edmnistrations répétées

    J. Pharmacol.

    (1976)
  • J.R. Brobeck et al.

    Variations in regulation of energy exchange associated with estrus, diestrus and pseudopregnancy in rats

    Endocrinology

    (1947)
  • C.P. Channing et al.

    Stimulatory effect of ovine prolactin upon cultured porcine granulosa cell secretion of inhibitory activity of oocyte maturation

    Endocrinology

    (1982)
  • Cited by (54)

    • TIDAL WAVES: Network mechanisms in the neuroendocrine control of prolactin release

      2014, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pathological hyperprolactinaemia causes effects that mirror the physiological actions of the hormone but are de-correlated from reproductive state. These include gynecomastia and galactorrhea (see Haddad and Wieck, 2004), infertility through oligo- or amenorrhea, (Delvoye et al., 1978; Greer et al., 1980; Smith et al., 2002; see Caufriez, 1985), diminished sexual drive, anorgasmia and ejaculatory dysfunction (Ghadirian et al., 1982; Buvat et al., 1985; Serretti and Chiesa, 2011; see Bolyakov and Paduch, 2011), obesity and metabolic syndrome (Parada et al., 1989; see Ben-Jonathan et al., 2006) as well as osteoporosis due to sex hormone imbalance (Klibanski et al., 1980). For an extensive review on the biology and actions of prolactin, the reader is referred to Freeman et al. (2000).

    • Lactational exposure to sulpiride: Assessment of maternal care and reproductive and behavioral parameters of male rat pups

      2013, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our study, SUL did not alter weight and food intake in dams during lactation. Although increased body weight was described in non-pregnant female rats [37,38], we believe that the lack of SUL-induced increase in body weight observed in this study with lactating dams is explained by the tremendous energy investment during lactation [39]. Mesolimbic and striatal dopaminergic pathways are thought to influence motor function such that DA receptor agonists stimulate and antagonists inhibit motor activity [25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text