Dynamic interactions between accommodation and convergence are velocity sensitive

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(86)90151-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Aftereffects of accommodation and vergence occur following approximately 1 min of adaptation to lenses and prisms respectively. This observation can be interpreted to mean that accommodation and vergence responses have phasic and tonic components. We have examined the role that these proposed subcomponents play in mutual interactions between accommodation and vergence. Both accommodative vergence (AV) and vergence accommodation (VA) were unresponsive to low temporal frequency variations (< 0. 1 Hz) in defocus and disparity respectively. However, both AV and VA were responsive to higher temporal frequency stimuli (up to 0.5 Hz). When negative feedback to the stimulated system was cancelled electronically, both AV and VA become responsive to low temporal frequency stimuli. The ratio or gain of accommodative vergence/accommodation (AC/A) and vergence accommodation/vergence (CA/C) increased nonlinearly with stimulus amplitude. Vergence aftereffects resulted from stimulation of AV and accommodative aftereffects resulted from stimulation of VA. These results are interpreted to mean there could be a complementary relationship between the amplitude of the AC/A ratio and proposed tonic adaptation of accommodation, and between the amplitude of the CA/C ratio and proposed tonic adaptation of vergence. A low saturation limit or stimulus window for tonic adaptation may account for the amplitude dependent nonlinearities of the AC/A and CA/C ratios.

References (36)

  • CraneH.D. et al.

    Ocular-focus stimulator

    J. opt. Soc. Am.

    (1970)
  • EbenholtzS.M.

    Accommodative hysteresis: a precursor for induced myopia

    Invest. Ophthal. visual Sci.

    (1983)
  • FinchamE.F.

    The accommodation reflex and its stimulus

    Br. J. Ophthal.

    (1951)
  • FinchamE.F. et al.

    The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence

    J. Physiol. Lond.

    (1957)
  • FlomM.C.

    On the relationship between accommodation and accommodative convergence. I Linearity

    Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt.

    (1960)
  • FryG.A.

    A experimental analysis of the accommodation-covergence relations

    Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom.

    (1937)
  • GarnerL. et al.

    The effects of phenylephrine hydrochloride on the resting focus of accommodation

    Invest. Ophthal. visual Sci.

    (1983)
  • HoganR.E. et al.

    The effects of moderate doses of ethanol on heterophoria and other aspects of binocular vision

    Ophthal. Physiol. Opt.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (141)

    • Focusing on an illusion: Accommodating to perceived depth?

      2019, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      No similar evidence of apparent flattening was found for accommodation, again suggesting that accommodation was not a function of vergence. The interaction between vergence and accommodation would anyway be expected to affect the phasic portion of the response rather than the steady state response measured here (Schor et al., 1992; Schor & Kotulak, 1986). Binocular disparities are not controlling either vergence or accommodation in the monocular conditions, but we cannot exclude the possibility of voluntary vergence is driving both.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text