Scenarios and priorities in transport planning: Application to the Sudan

doi:10.1016/0041-1647(77)90044-2

Transportation Research

Volume 11, Issue 5, October 1977, Pages 343-350

https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-1647(77)90044-2 Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper describes two related aspects of a transportation planning study recently completed for the Sudan—the use of scenarios and the prioritization of those scenarios and the associated transport projects. In the use of scenarios, considerable care was taken in the specification of different types of scenarios and the planning issues each is designed to highlight, and the approach should find application to other transport problems. For the selection of a particular scenario, to be used as a basis for detailed transport project planning, a new method of evaluation or prioritization was developed, and this is presented also. Both are illustrated by the application to the Sudan.

References (2)

P.A. Julien et al.
La Methode Des Scenarios
(1974)
T.L. Saaty
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical systems
Jour. Math. Psych.
(1977)

Cited by (60)

Cross-border e-commerce logistics – Strategic success factors for airports
2020, Research in Transportation Economics
Citation Excerpt :
To analyse this in more detail, an Analytical Hierarchy Analysis (AHP) is carried out, based on face-to-face interviews. The AHP method was introduced by Thomas Saaty in the mid-70s (Saaty, 1977) and was presented as a method to prioritize transportation projects based on their impacts in multiple scenarios. The main idea of the method is to cope with the intuitive, rational as well as the irrational behaviour present in multicriteria decision-making processes.
E-commerce has become a real game-changer in the air cargo industry and is forecasted to be the main growth driver in the following years. Airlines, forwarders, integrators and airports are trying to increase their market share in this growing market and hence develop strategies to attract as much e-commerce activities as possible. This paper investigates the cross-border e-commerce market from the airport's perspective. First, a market analysis is carried out and an overview of the air cargo industry is given. Moreover, the relevance of e-commerce for airports is highlighted. Second, by means of a literature review, the potential factors on which airports can focus to attract cross-border e-commerce are identified. Those factors are then verified by conducting structured interviews with different actors involved in the cross-border e-commerce air transport chain and as well as by performing an AHP analysis. As a result the following factors are identified as an absolute prerequisite to develop cross-border e-commerce at an airport: ability to pre-clear e-commerce goods, high airlift and land capacity. Furthermore, the e-commerce market should be facilitated by seamless data exchange. The outcome of this research will be relevant for the industry as it will enable airports to check whether their strategy is focusing on the right critical success factors to boost the local e-commerce cargo flows.
One Belt one Road, but several routes: A case study of new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe
2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Under the Belt and Road (B&R) initiative, two new emerging trade corridors connecting the Far East to Europe have been built. One is the China-Europe Sea-Land Express Line (CESEL) and the other is the New Eurasian Land Bridge (NELB). This paper aims to understand the attitude of relevant stakeholders towards the performance of the Traditional Sea-Land Line (TSLL) alongside the two emerging container routes under the B&R initiative. To achieve this objective, we first of all built a performance evaluation system to understand the relative performance of these trade routes. A questionnaire survey was carried out to reveal the differing views on route performance, and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) was then used to examine and interpret the survey data. Secondly, by dividing the interviewees into two groups, we examined whether the government’s development priorities are at variance with the preferences of industry practitioners. Thirdly, we explored the reasons for the variance by conducting an intensive interview with ten key stakeholders and then explain the findings from the perspective of institutional theories. Finally, we addressed the uncertainty and dynamics of route development under three different scenarios. Several managerial implications are proposed on the basis of our findings.
An evaluation on the criteria to prioritize transportation infrastructure investments in Brazil
2015, Transport Policy
Citation Excerpt :
Fishburn and Lavalle (1999) explain that this practice is generically called multi-criteria decision making. This approach fits the problems of governmental investments, being used by several authors (Saaty, 1977; Azis, 1990; Lisboa and Saragiotto, 2004; Tudela et al., 2006; Hotta, 2007; Kuwahara, 2008; Silva and Neto, 2010) to analyze the problem of decision making in the priority on transportation infrastructure investments. Several techniques were developed to accomplish multicriteria analysis such as (Rafaeli, 2009): Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realité – ELECTRE; Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations – PROMETHEE; Multi-Attribute Utility Theory – MAUT; Analytic Hierarchy Process – AHP; Non-Traditional Capital Investment Criteria – NCIC; Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique –MACBETH; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution – TOPSIS; Data Envelopment Analysis – DEA; and Multicriteria Interactive Decision Making – TODIM.
This paper presents a study on the criteria priorities on the decisions of transportation infrastructure investments in Brazil, based on the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process – AHP. We consider the definition of a set of seven criteria and respective parameters, structured in four groups: logistics/transportation, economic/financial, social and environmental. Representatives of four different sectors, which contribute to the decision making on transportation in Brazil, were used to find their different points of view about the criteria. With the main aim of prioritization of the criteria, it was considered one of the national policies of Brazilian transportation goals, i.e., the modal split balance of interurban cargo transportation. Thus, each expert provided a pair comparisons of the criteria and pondered their relative importance, attributing weights based upon the scale used by AHP. These comparisons do not consider which projects should be prioritized, but only the importance of each criterion in relation to the others. As a main result, the criterion “reduction of transportation costs” was presented in several scenarios as the most relevant.
A new composite decision support framework for strategic and sustainable transport appraisals
2015, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Citation Excerpt :
The multiplicative AHP (Lootsma, 1992) is based on pair wise comparisons of alternatives and criteria to obtain scores and weights. The technique is a further development of the original additive Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) by Saaty (1977) and is based on the multiplicative value function model. The multiplicative AHP offers a more theoretically correct approach than the additive AHP, but in practice the two methods demand the same type of input and generate the same type of output (Olson et al., 1995).
This paper concerns the development of a new decision support framework for the appraisal of transport infrastructure projects. In such appraisals there will often be a need for including both conventional transport impacts as well as criteria of a more strategic and/or sustainable character. The proposed framework is based on the use of cost-benefit analysis featuring feasibility risk assessment in combination with multi-criteria decision analysis and is supported by the concept of decision conferencing. The framework is applied for a transport related case study dealing with the complex decision problem of determining the most attractive alternative for a new fixed link between Denmark and Sweden – the so-called HH-connection. Applying the framework to the case study made it possible to address the decision problem from an economic, a strategic, and a sustainable point of view simultaneously. The outcome of the case study demonstrates the decision making framework as a valuable decision support system (DSS), and it is concluded that appraisals of transport projects can be effectively supported by the use of the DSS. Finally, perspectives of the future modelling work are given.
Optimizing high-speed rail routes using a Spatial Decision Support System (SDSS): The Texas Urban Triangle (TUT) case
2014, Journal of Transport Geography
Citation Excerpt :
The authors utilized a 30 × 30-m raster format because the right-of-way for one-way high-speed rail is 30 m (CHSRA, 2010). In this study, a 1-to-5 scale was used instead of a 1-to-9 scale, which generally is recommended by other researchers (Saaty, 1977; Bright, 1992; Ramanathan, 2001). Implementing a reduced scale increases the sensitivity of variable effects.
Previously, an analytical method was derived to model a possible high-speed rail route within the Texas Urban Triangle (TUT) area. By implementing a raster-based geographic information system (GIS), researchers were able to optimize a route with the given variables. Based on prior research outcomes, the authors improved the overall analytical approach. This article expands the study boundary from Travis County through Bexar County to test the corridor between the San Antonio and Austin metropolitan areas. Nearby counties are also included, resulting in a total of six counties. In addition, a statistical tool, explanatory factor analysis (EFA), is added to fill the gap identified in the previous modeling practices. The project addresses transportation corridor planning in the Texas Urban Triangle at the regional scale. Its aim is to determine the most suitable locations for new transport infrastructure by employing a Spatial Decision Support System (SDSS). The proposed SDSS provides a composite foundation for decision making to attain enhanced regional mobility, especially for a high-speed rail (HSR). Route alternatives are compared in terms of construction estimates, anticipated land acquisition fees, and suitability scores.
An MCDA approach for the selection of bike projects based on structuring and appraising activities
2012, European Journal of Operational Research
Citation Excerpt :
It is the essence of the technique that human judgments, and not just the underlying information, can be used in performing the evaluations. Thus, the CPP-DSS makes use of the REMBRANDT (Ratio Estimation in Magnitudes or deci-Bells to Rate Alternatives which are Non-Dominated) technique by Lootsma (1988, 1999) which is a multiplicative version of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) by Saaty (1977, 2001). REMBRANDT proposes to overcome three issues regarding the theory behind AHP, for elaborations of these see Olson et al. (1995), Ramanathan (1997), Lootsma (1999), and Van den Honert and Lootsma (2000).
This paper presents an MCDA approach for the structuring and appraising activities of a large and complex decision problem. More specifically, the paper makes use of the three-step structuring process for decision analysis proposed by von Winterfeldt and Edwards: (1) identifying the problem; (2) selecting an appropriate analytic approach; and (3) developing a detailed analytic structure. For illustration of the approach a case study dealing with the assessment task of prioritising and selecting initiatives and projects from a public pool with limited funds is examined throughout the paper. The process is embedded in a Decision Support System (DSS) making use of the REMBRANDT technique for pair wise comparisons to determine project rankings. A procedure for limiting the number of pair wise comparisons to be made in the process is in this connection presented. Finally, strengths and weaknesses in the approach are discussed and conclusions are made.

View all citing articles on Scopus

^☆: This study was conducted by the ADAR Corporation for the Kuwait Fund of Arab Economic Development and the Democratic Republic of the Sudan. The author was the director of the project.

View full text

Scenarios and priorities in transport planning: Application to the Sudan☆

Abstract

La Methode Des Scenarios

A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical systems

Jour. Math. Psych.