Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:28:51.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation of Social Evolution and Dispersal in Ungulates During the Pleistocene, with Emphasis on the old World Deer and the Genus Bison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Valerius Geist
Valerius Geist*
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Centre (Kananaskis), The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The evolution of Pleistocene mammals is characterized by giantism and in the ungulates by the appearance of huge and often bizarre horns, antlers, ossicones, and tusks. An earlier study of sheep (Ovis) led to a theory explaining these phenomena. This theory, termed the “dispersal theory,” is described briefly and then applied to the evolution of Old World deer (Cervinea, Baird, 1857). It is shown that the zoogeography and physical characteristics of Old World deer follow the predictions of this theory. Attention is drawn to the parallels in zoogeography and convergent evolutionary changes between Old World deer and other ungulates such as New World deer, the goats and sheep and the genus Bison. The application of the “dispersal theory” to the evolution of the genus Bison shows that it is compatible with known facts and that it explains aspects of Bison morphology not usually considered. It also suggested a new and testable hypothesis of the origin of present-day Bison. In general the “dispersal theory” applied to Pleistocene conditions predicts that a specialization of social behavior and social organs leading to giantism, altered body proportions and bizarre hornlike organs occurs during postglacial dispersal into new habitat. It also describes the characteristics of these early, pioneering populations. In so doing it links the disciplines of animal behavior, ecology, animal science, population dynamics, and zoogeography into a functional whole. In particular it shows the relationship between ecology and social behavior. Finally, the “dispersal theory” is shown to be a general theory, applicable to Pleistocene and pre-Pleistocene conditions. In the tropics or pre-Pleistocene conditions social evolution follows ecological specialization, while in the periglacial zones social evolution only reflects the colonization history of the species. It is shown that the “dispersal theory” unites the apparently contradictory views on evolution and zoogeography of Matthews and Darlington. Matthews' views apply largely to Pleistocene conditions and Darlington's to pre-Pleistocene conditions. A preliminary application of the “dispersal theory” to pre-Pleistocene mammals suggests that it predicts correctly.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Quaternary Research , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1971 , pp. 285 - 315
Copyright
University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banfield, A.W. (1961). A revision of the reindeer and caribou genus, Rangifer. National Museum Canada, Bulletin No. 177. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Beninde, J. (1937). Naturgeschichte des Rothirsches. Monographie der Wildsäugetiere IV. P. Schöps, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K.K. (1961). Energy utilisation in the ruminant. In “Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant” (Lewis, D., ed.),pp. 183–197. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Bohlken, H. (1967). Beitrag zur Systematik der recenten Formen der Gattung Bison H. Smith, 1827. Zeitschrift Zoologischer und systematischer Evolutionsforschung 5, 54–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, P.T. (1969). Territoriality in pronghorn bucks on the National Bison Range, Moise, Montana. Journal of Mammalogy 50, 81–89.Google Scholar
Brownlee, R.G., Silverstein, R.M., Müller-Schwarze, D., and Singer, A.G. (1969). Isolation, identification and function of the chief component of the male torsal scent in black-tailed deer. Nature 211, 284–285.Google Scholar
Buechner, H.K. (1963). Territoriality as a behavioural adaptation to environment in the Kob. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Zoology 3, 59–63.Google Scholar
Cowan, I. McTaggart (1936). Distribution and variation in deer (Genus Odocoileus) of the Pacific Coastal Region of North America. California Fish and Game 22, 155–246.Google Scholar
Cowan, I. McTaggart (1956). What and where are the mule and black-tailed deer? In “The Deer of North America” (Taylor, W.P., ed.), pp. 335–359. Stackpole Co., Harrisburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Cowan, I.McTaggart, and Guiguet, C.J. (1965). The mammals of British Columbia (3rd edition, revised). British Columbia Provincial Museum, Handbook No. 11, Victoria. Google Scholar
Crook, J.H. (1970). Social organisation and the environment: Aspects of contemporary social ethology. Animal Behaviour 18, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, P.J. (1957). “Zoogeography: The Geographic Distribution of Animals.” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
De Vos, A. (1965). Territorial behaviour among puku in Zambia. Science 148, 1752–1753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, L.S. (1970). Speciation and changing environment. American Zoologist 10, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan, J.M. (1965). Beitrag zur systematischen Gliederung des Tribus Rupicaprini, Simpson (1945). Zeitschrift Zoologischer und System-atischer Evolutionsforschung 1, 314–407.Google Scholar
Espmark, Y. (1964). Rutting behaviour in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L). Animal Behaviour 12, 159–163.Google Scholar
Estes, R.D. (1966). Behaviour and life history of the wildebeest. Nature 212, 999–1000.Google Scholar
Estes, R.D. (1969). Territorial behaviour of the wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus Burchell, 1823). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 26, 284–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flerov, C.C. (1952). Musk deer and deer. “Fauna U.S.S.R.” Vol. 1, No. 2, Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R, (English translation U.S. Dept. of Commerce) pp. 257, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Flerov, C.C. (1965). Comparative craniology of recent representatives of the genus Bison (English translation, Boreal Institute, The University of Alberta). Bulletin of Moscow Naturalists 70, No. 1.Google Scholar
Flerov, C.C. (1967). On the origin of the mammalian fauna of Canada. In “The Bering Land Bridge” (Hopkins, D.M., ed.), pp. 271–280,.Stanford Univ. Press. Google Scholar
Flerov, C.C., and Zablotski, M.A. (1961). On the causative factors responsible for the change in bison range. (English translation, W. A. Fuller, The University of Alberta). Bulletin of Moscow Naturalists 66, 99–109.Google Scholar
Frenzel, B. (1968). The Pleistocene vegetation of northern Eurasia. Science 161, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garutt, W.E. (1964). Das Mammut. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei No. 331 A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt.Google Scholar
Geist, V. (1966a). “On the Behaviour and Evolution of American Mountain Sheep.” Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia, 251 pp.Google Scholar
Geist, V. (1966b). The evolution of hornlike organs. Behaviour 27, 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V. (1966c). The evolutionary significance of mountain sheep horns. Evolution 20, 558–566.Google Scholar
Geist, V. (1966d). Ethological observations on some North American cervids. Zoologische Beiträge (N.F.) 12, 219–250.Google Scholar
Geist, V. (1968). On delayed social and physical maturation in mountain sheep. Canadian Journal of Zoology 46, 899–904.Google Scholar
Geist, V. (1971). “Mountain Sheep: A Study in Behavior and Evolution.” University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Godina, A.Y. Gromova, V.I. Sokolov, I.I. Trofimov, B.A. Flerov, K.K. Khaveson, Y.I. (1962). Order Artiodactyla In “Fundamentals of Paleontology” (Orlov, Y.A. ed.), Vol. 8 (Mammals), (English translation, U.S. Dept. of Commerce), pp. 467–572. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Gottschlich, H.J. (1965). Biotop und Wuchsform—eine craniometrisch-allometrische Studie an europäischen Populationen von Cervus elaphus. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung 78, 83–101.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. (1966a). The extinct wapiti of Alaska and Yukon Territory. Canadian Journal of Zoology 44, 47–57.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R.D. (1966b). Pelage of fossil bison—a new osteological index. Journal of Mammalogy 47, 725–727.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R.D. (1970a). Evolution of human threat display organs. In “Evolutionary Biology” (Dobzhansky, Th. Hecht, M.K. Steer, W.G. eds.), Vol. 4, pp. 257–302. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Educational Division of Meredith Corporation.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R.D. (1970b). Bison evolution and zoogeography in North America during the Pleistocene. The Quarterly Review of Biology 45, 1–15.Google Scholar
Haltenorth, Th. (1963). Die Klassifikation der Säugetiere: Artiodactyla. Handbuch der Zoologie 8(32), 167. Pp.Google Scholar
Heptner, W.G., and Nasimovitsch, A.A. (1967). Der Elch. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei No. 386. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt.Google Scholar
Heptner, W.G., Nasimovitsch, A.A., and Bannikov, A.G. (1961). “Mammals of the Soviet Union” (German translation), G. Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R.S., and Taber, R.D. (1967). Origin and history of holarctic tundra ecosystem, with special reference to their vertebrate fauna., In “Arctic and Alpine Environments” (Wright, H.E. Jr., and Osburn, W.H. eds.), pp. 143–170. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Katser, J. (1969). Indians in Siberia. Arctic 22, 70–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellog, R. (1956). What and where are the white tails. In “The Deer of North America” (Taylor, W.P. ed.), pp. 31–35. Stackpole Co., Harrisburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Kiddie, D.G. (1962). The Sika deer in New Zealand. New Zealand Forest Service, Information Series No. 44, Wellington.Google Scholar
Kiley-Worthington, M. (1965). The waterbuck (Kobus deffassa Ruppell 1835 and K. ellipsiprimus Ogilby 1833) in East Africa: Spatial distribution. A study of the sexual behaviour. Mammalia 29, 117–204.Google Scholar
Klein, R.G. (1969). Mousterian cultures in European Russia. Science 164, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kock, D., and Schomber, H.W. (1961). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Verbreitung und des Bestandes des Atlashirsches (Cervus elaphus barbarus) sowie eine Bemerkung zu seiner Geweihausbildung. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 9, 51–54.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. (1968). “Pleistocene Mammals of Europe.” Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
Ledger, H.P., and Smith, N.S. (1964). The carcass and body weight composition of the Uganda Kob. Journal of Wildlife Management 28, 827–839.Google Scholar
Lent, P.C. (1965). Rutting behaviour in a barren-ground caribou population. Animal Behaviour 13, 259–264.Google Scholar
Lent, P.C. (1969). A preliminary study of the okavango lechwe (Kobus leche leche Gray). East African Wildlife Journal 7, 147–157.Google Scholar
Leuthold, W. (1966). Variations in territorial behaviour of Uganda Kob (Adenota kob thomasi, Neumann, 1896). Behaviour 27, 214–257.Google Scholar
Linke, W. (1957). Der Rothirsch. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei No. 129 A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg-Lutherstadt.Google Scholar
Lydekker, R. (1894). “The Royal Natural History,” Vol. II F. Warne, London.Google Scholar
Maringer, J., and Bandi, H.G. (1953). “Art in the Ice Age.” F. A. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
Martin, P.S., and Wright, H.E. Jr. (eds.), (1967). “Pleistocene Extinctions.” Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Matthew, W.D. (1915). Climate and evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 24, 171–318.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.R. (1969). The tule elk. University of California Publications in Zoology, Vol. 88, p. 191, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Schwarze, D. (1969). Complexity and relative specificity in mammalian pheromone. Nature 223, 525–526.Google Scholar
Murie, O. (1951). “The Elk of North America.” Stackpole Co., Harrisburg, Pa.Google Scholar
Mykytowycz, R. (1965). Further observations on the territorial function and histology of the submandibular cautaneous (chin) glands in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Animal Behaviour 13, 400–412.Google Scholar
Mykytowycz, R. (1966a b and c). Observations on odoriferous and other glands in the Australian wild rabbit, Oryctolagus cuniculus (L) and the hare Lepus europaeus. C.S.I.R.O. Wildlife Reseach 11, (I) The anal glands: 11–29; (II) The inguinal glands: 49–64; (III) The submandibular glands: 65–90.Google Scholar
Mykytowycz, R. (1968). Territorial marking by rabbits. Scientific American 218, 116–126.Google Scholar
Myron, R. (1964). “Prehistoric Art.” Pitman Publishing Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Parkyn, E.A. (1915). “Prenhistoric Art.” Longmans, Green, London.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.L. (1955). “North American Moose.” University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, J.F. (1963). “The Search for Early Man.” American Heritage Publishing Co., Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
Schaffer, W.H. (1968). Intraspecific combat and the evolution of the caprini. Evolution 22, 817–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaller, G.B. (1967). “The Deer and the Tiger.” University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaller, G.B. (1969). Observations on the hangul or kashmir stag (Cervus elaphus hangul Wagner). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 66, 1–7.Google Scholar
Schultze-Westrum, Th. (1965). Innerartliche Verständigung durch Düfte beim Gleitbeutler Petaurus breviceps papuanus Thomas. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie 50, 151–220.Google Scholar
Scott, W.B. (1937). “A History of Land Mammals in the Western Hemisphere” (1962 edition). Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
Spinage, C.A. (1968). Horns and other bony structures of the skull of the giraffe, and their functional significance. East African Wildlife Journal 6, 53–61.Google Scholar
Stock, C. (1953). Rancho La Brae. Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Science Series No. 20 (5th edition). Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Thenius, E., and Hofer, R. (1960). “Stammesgeschichte der Säugetiere.” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Walther, F. (1958). Zum Kampf- und Paarungsverhalten einiger Antilopen. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 15, 340–380.Google Scholar
Walther, F. (1962). Von Waffen und Kämpfen bei Horntieren. Die Blauen Heft, 3/4.Google Scholar
Walther, F. (1964). Einige Verhaltensbeobachtungen an Thomsongazellen (Gazella thomsoni, Günther 1884) im Ngorongoro-Krater. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 21, 871–890.Google Scholar
Walther, F. (1965). Verhaltensstudien an der Grantgazelle (Gazella Granti, Brooke 1872) im Ngorongoro-Krater. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 22, 167–208.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F.E.(1959). “The Pleistocene Period.” Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar