Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 7, Issue 5, November 1971, Pages 733-736
Physiology & Behavior

Preshock-produced intensification of passive avoidance responding and of elevation in corticosteroid level

https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(71)90141-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The adrenocortical steroid response and passive avoidance behavior were studied in rats that had been exposed to inescapable intense shock (preshock). Previously preshocked animals exhibited a greater adrenocortical steroid response to mild shock than nonpreshocked controls; in addition, passive avoidance behavior was facilitated in the preshocked animals.

References (12)

  • D.C. Anderson et al.

    Variations in unsignaled inescapable preshock as determinants of responses to punishment

    J. comp. physiol. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl.

    (1968)
  • D.C. Anderson et al.

    Intensification of passive-avoidance learning as a function of preshock and a 39 KHz tone

  • D.C. Anderson et al.

    Adrenocorticotrophic hormone and acquisition of a passive avoidance response: A replication and extension

    J. comp. physiol. Psychol.

    (1968)
  • D.C. Anderson et al.

    Number and duration of inescapable preshocks and variation in time of testing as determinants of escape-avoidance learning in the rat

  • K.H. Brookshire et al.

    Residual of shock-trauma in the white rat: a three-factor theory

    Psychol. Monogr.

    (1961)
  • B.A. Campbell et al.

    Electrical and behavioral effects of different types of shock stimuli on the rat

    J. comp. physiol. Psychol.

    (1958)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • PTSD and stress sensitisation: A tale of brain and body Part 2: Animal models

    2007, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    One week after pre-shocks, the plasma corticosterone response to a novel cage is increased compared to non-shocked controls (Weinberg et al., 1980). Two weeks after pre-shocks, the corticosterone response to a reminder footshock (Madden et al., 1971), but also to a novel open field (Levine and Madden, 1973), to a startle apparatus (Chalmers et al., 1974) and to heat-induced pain (Caggiula et al., 1989), the ACTH response to noise in a novel cage (van Dijken et al., 1993) and the ACTH and corticosterone response to a novel, electrified prod in the home cage (Bruijnzeel et al., 2001a) are all greater than in non-shocked controls. Even though peak corticosterone levels in the noise test are not greater in previously shocked rats, the temporal dynamics seem to point to a faster negative feedback (van Dijken et al., 1993).

  • Exposure to repeated low-level formaldehyde in rats increases basal corticosterone levels and enhances the corticosterone response to subsequent formaldehyde

    2001, Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Previous work examining the effect of repeated stress has demonstrated a variety of outcomes regarding CORT responses. Some studies have demonstrated no changes in CORT levels after repeated presentations of stress [23,36], while others have demonstrated a sensitization of basal and/or stress-induced CORT responses after repeated stress [17,23,26,27,34], and even a single pre-exposure to a stressor is sufficient to sensitize the CORT response [7]. However, the literature also supports an habituation response of CORT to repeated stressor presentation ( [21,22,25,51]; also, see [12] and references therein).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was supported in part by NIMH grant MH 14436-02 and 03 to D. Chris Anderson, NGL 05-020-326 (NASA) and ONR Contract N00014-67-A-0112-0009 (Navy) to Seymour Levine. The valuable assistance of Saku Mantena is gratefully acknowledged.

2

Now at the Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania.

3

Supported by USPHS Research Scientist Award 1-K05-MH-19936 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

View full text