Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
Volume 23, Issue 3, June 1979, Pages 360-372
When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs☆
References (15)
- et al.
The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability?
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1975) - et al.
Physical attractiveness
- et al.
Are women executives people?
Harvard Business Review
(1965)et al.Are women executives people?
Harvard Business Review
(1965) - et al.
Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal
Journal of Social Issues
(1972) - et al.
Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision-making
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1977) - et al.
Subtle effects of sex-role stereotypes on recruiters' hiring decisions
Journal of Applied Psychology
(1975) - et al.
What is beautiful is good
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
(1972)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (252)
Female attractiveness engenders honesty among men but dishonesty among women
2024, Journal of Economic Behavior and OrganizationMirror, mirror—A gendered lens on female entrepreneurs’ facial attractiveness in reward-based crowdfunding
2023, Journal of Business Venturing InsightsBeauty and stock market participation
2023, Journal of Banking and FinanceEmployers’ and applicants’ fairness perceptions in job interviews: using a teleoperated robot as fair proxy
2022, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeCEO Selection and Executive Appearance
2023, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
- ☆
This research was partially funded by the Center for Research in Career Development, Columbia University, Graduate School of Business.
Copyright © 1979 Published by Elsevier Inc.