Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(91)90100-MGet rights and content

Abstract

Subjects were presented with two groups of characters and were to decide whether they were the same or different. The stimulus groups differed either by a single feature (“preattentive” trials) or by a conjunction of features (“attentive” trials). The two stimulus groups appeared at the corners of an imaginary square centered about the fixation point, falling either in the same or different hemifields. In two experiments, subjects evaluated both types of stimuli faster when they were presented in different hemifields than in the same hemifield. Subjects also compared pairs of single characters faster when they appeared in different hemifields. Finally, this different-hemifield advantage was eliminated when the characters appeared sequentially. These results indicated that two stimuli that appear simultaneously in the same hemifield engender either a competition for common processing structures or intrahemispheric inhibition.

References (47)

  • J. Beck

    Perceptual grouping produced by line figures

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1967)
  • J.R. Bergen et al.

    Parallel versus serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination

    Nature

    (1983)
  • R. Desimone et al.

    Form, color, and motion analysis in prestriate cortex of macaque monkey

  • C.J. Downing et al.

    The spatial structure of visual attention

  • H. Egeth et al.

    Differential specialisation of the cerebral hemispheres for the perception of sameness and difference

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1972)
  • C.W. Eriksen et al.

    Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1987)
  • C.W. Eriksen et al.

    Allocation of attention in the visual field

    J. exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1985)
  • A. Friedman et al.

    Hemispheres as independent resource systems: Limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization

    J. exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1981)
  • A. Friedman et al.

    Dividing attention within and between hemispheres: Testing a multiple resources approach to limited-capacity information processing

    J. exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1982)
  • C.G. Gross

    Visual functions of inferotemporal cortex

  • H. Hughes et al.

    Spatial maps of directed visual attention

    J. exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1985)
  • B. Julesz et al.

    Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures

    Bell Syst. tech. J.

    (1983)
  • D. Kahneman

    Attention and Effort

    (1973)
  • Cited by (91)

    • Modulating the influence of recent trial history on attentional capture via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of right TPJ

      2020, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      As expected, the analysis indicated a significant interaction between Target side and Distractor side, F (1, 7969.6) = 26.63, p < .001, reflecting longer RTs when target and distractor were on the same side (M = 480 ms, SD = 257 ms) compared to opposite sides (M = 462 ms, SD = 256 ms). This is in line with previous studies, demonstrating a bilateral field advantage (BFA) in early visual attentional processing, i.e., enhanced visual processing when (relevant) stimuli are spread across both visual hemifields (Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2005; Kraft et al., 2005; Lega et al., 2019; Sereno & Kosslyn, 1991). However, TMS did not interact with either Target side, F (2, 7971.9) < 1, p = .39, or Distractor side F (2, 7970.0) = 1.82, p = .16, or their interaction F (2, 7967.2) = 1.10, p = .33.

    • Impaired visual short-term memory capacity is distinctively associated with structural connectivity of the posterior thalamic radiation and the splenium of the corpus callosum in preterm-born adults

      2017, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      FA in the splenium of the corpus callosum has been shown to be related to the degree of such a bilateral processing advantage (Davis and Cabeza, 2015). Thus, especially in preterm-born adults, FA of the corpus callosum might be critical for a potential compensatory hemispheric interaction between parallel vSTM storage systems with relatively independent resources in both hemispheres (e.g., Sereno and Kosslyn, 1991). In order to test these hypotheses, 28 pre- and 27 full-term born young adults were assessed by both diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and a TVA-based whole-report task.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text