Attitude structure and belief accessibility

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90010-4Get rights and content

Abstract

This article examines the structure of beliefs about abortion and welfare. For each issue, a sample of respondents indicated their agreement with statements about the issues and sorted the statements into groups based on their similarity. These data were used to measure the relations among the statements. For both issues, the sort data revealed a number of topical clusters, while the agreement data revealed a single underlying dimension. The main study examined which belief structures were apparent when respondents answered attitude questions based on the statements in the scaling studies. Respondents were timed as they answered attitude questions about abortion and welfare; responses to agree/disagree items were faster when an item followed another item from the same topical cluster. The distance between successive items on the pro-con dimension affected reaction times for the welfare items but not the items on abortion. We argue that attitudes are structures in long-term memory that encompass linked beliefs about an issue, that the retrieval of beliefs is a component of the process of responding to attitude items, and that retrieving beliefs relevant to one question can activate linked beliefs and thereby facilitate answers to related questions.

References (58)

  • N. Cantor et al.

    Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1977)
  • P. Conover et al.

    The role of inference in the perception of political candidates

  • R. D'Andrade

    U-statistic hierarchical clustering

    Psychometrika

    (1978)
  • L. Davis

    Public attitudes toward welfare allocation

  • R. Dawes et al.

    Attitude and opinion measurement

  • R. Fazio

    On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility

  • R. Fazio et al.

    On the automatic activation of attitudes

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • R. Fazio et al.

    Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 Presidential election

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • J.R. Feagin

    Subordinating the poor: Welfare and American beliefs

    (1975)
  • J. Fee

    Symbols and attitudes: How people think about politics

  • S. Feldman

    Economic individualism and American public opinion

    American Politics Quarterly

    (1983)
  • S.T. Fiske et al.

    Involvement, expertise, and schema use: Evidence from political cognition

  • R. Hamill et al.

    Cognitive consequences of political sophistication

  • R. Hastie et al.

    The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line

    Psychological Review

    (1986)
  • S. Iyengar et al.

    The evening news and presidential evaluations

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1984)
  • C. Judd et al.

    The structural bases of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance

  • F. Kerlinger

    Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes

    (1984)
  • D. Kinder et al.

    Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to “the good life”

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1981)
  • E. Knowles

    Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1988)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Segmenting the public's risk beliefs about drone delivery: A belief system approach

      2019, Telematics and Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      These beliefs are unique to a particular application, and cannot be applied to other applications or drones in general. Hierarchical systems, then, allow people to logically organize and easily retrieve a complex set of beliefs about multiple related objects (Tourangeau et al., 1991). The fact that beliefs are embedded in a hierarchical system provides a novel way to understand how subgroups of the general public differ in their risk beliefs about drone delivery.

    • Determinants of top management's capability to identify core employees

      2015, BRQ Business Research Quarterly
      Citation Excerpt :

      As it will be explained below, validated scales were used to measure the different constructs in our model. The scales were selected considering Tourangeau et al. (1991) criteria, avoiding ambiguous or unclear items, vague concepts and complex wording. Additionally, we performed specific analyses to control for CMB: (1) Harman's single-factor test, (2) Unmeasured Latent Method Construct (ULMC) and, (3) analysis of correlations.

    • Common Method Bias: It’s Bad, It’s Complex, It’s Widespread, and It’s Not Easy to Fix

      2024, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The research described here was supported by NSF Grants SES-8411970 and SES-8521313 awarded to the first and third authors. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 95th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, August,1987, in New York.

    View full text