Phylogeny of the Polystomatidae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea), with particular reference to Polystoma integerrimum

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(94)00138-EGet rights and content

Abstract

Polystome phylogeny is examined, with emphasis on the dimorphism of the frog parasite Polystoma integerrimum, which exists in a fully differentiated and a neotenic form, and the evolutionary development of exclusively neotenic genera. Protopolystoma, which infects the aquatic toad Xenopus, has essentially the same morphology as the neotenic (branchial) adult of P. integerrimum and is interpreted as a neotenic genus; however, it inhabits the bladder of its host, the infection site of the normal adult of the dimorphic species. The sphyranurid Sphyranura, ectoparasitic on the external gills of the mud puppy Necturus, resembles the two-sucker larva of P. integerrimum in possessing a single pair of haptorial suckers in place of the 6 suckers of adult polystomes, and is probably a neotenic parasite associated with a neotenic host. The neotenic animals in general are parasites of aquatic hosts, and the uterus is lost or reduced in these genera; by contrast, uterine function is greatly enhanced among polystomes infecting amphibians best adapted to terrestrial life.

References (45)

  • J.B. Williams

    Epidermal ultrastructure of the adult parasitic phase female and encapsulated larvae of Kronborgia isopodicola (Platyhelminthes, Fecampiidae): phylogenetic implications

    International Journal for Parasitology

    (1993)
  • C.H. Alvey

    Morphology and development of the monogenean trematode Sphyranura oligorchis, with a description of S. polyorchis sp. nov.

    Parasitology

    (1936)
  • Z. Bekkouche et al.

    Differénces ultrastructurales entre monogènes Monopisthocotylea et Polyopisthocotylea, parasites d'amphibiens

  • A.M. Christensen et al.

    Kronborgia amphipodicola gen. et sp. nov., a dioecious turbellarian parasitizing ampeliscid amphipods

    Ophelia

    (1964)
  • C. Combes

    Recherches sur les formes néoténiques de Polystomatidae (Monogenea). Néoténiques de Polystoma integerrimum pelobatis Euzet et Combes, 1966, obtenus expérimentalement chez Pelobates cultripes (Cuvier)

    Societé Neuchateloise des Sciences Naturelles. Bulletin.

    (1966)
  • C. Combes

    Biologie, ecologie des cycles et biogeographie de Digenes et Monogenes d'Amphibiens dans l'Est des Pyrenees

    Memoirs de la Musée Nationale d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, série A

    (1968)
  • G.R. De Beer
  • G.E. Freytag

    Urodeles and caecilians

  • D.W. Halton et al.

    Observations on the nutrition of monogenetic trematodes

    Biological Bulletin

    (1965)
  • J.-L. Justine

    Phylogeny of parasitic Platyhelminthes: a critical study of synapomorphies proposed on the basis of the ultrastructure of spermiogenesis and spermatozoa

    Canadian Journal of Zoology

    (1990)
  • D.J. Kok et al.

    Polystoma australis (Monogenea): development and reproduction in neotenic parasites

    South African Journal of Zoology

    (1989)
  • B.I. Lebedev

    Monogenea in the light of new evidence and their position among platyhelminths

    Angewandte Parasitologie

    (1988)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Lessons from parasitic flatworms about evolution and historical biogeography of their vertebrate hosts

      2009, Comptes Rendus - Biologies
      Citation Excerpt :

      They mainly differ from all other fish monogeneans by their well-developed opisthaptor with three pairs of cup-like suckers. Sphyranura which is the only genus with only one pair of suckers has been identified as a paedomorphic parasite according to its development and phylogenetic position within the Polystomatidae [39–41]. Polystomes like all other monogeneans are generally host and site specific.

    • Parasites of Amphibians

      2008, Flynn's Parasites of Laboratory Animals: Second Edition
    View full text