Regular article
Double in situ hybridization in combination with digital image analysis: A new approach to study interphase chromosome topography

https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(89)90188-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Double in situ hybridization with mercurated and biotinylated chromosome specific DNA probes in combination with digital image analysis provides a new approach to compare the distribution of homologous and nonhomologous chromosome targets within individual interphase nuclei. Here we have used two DNA probes representing tandemly repeated sequences specific for the constitutive heterochromatin of the human chromosomes 1 and 15, respectively, and studied the relative arrangements of these chromosome targets in interphase nuclei of human lymphocytes, amniotic fluid cells, and fibroblasts, cultivated in vitro. We have developed a 2D-image analysis approach which allows the rapid evaluation of large numbers of interphase nuclei. Models to test for a random versus nonrandom distribution of chromosome segments are discussed taking into account the three-dimensional origin of the evaluated 2D-distribution. In all three human diploid cell types the measurements of target-target and target-center distances in the 2D-nuclear image revealed that the labeled segments of the two chromosomes 15 were distributed both significantly closer to each other and closer to the center of the nuclear image than the labeled chromosome 1 segments. This result can be explained by the association of nucleolus organizer regions on the short arm of chromosome 15 with nucleoli located more centrally in these nuclei and does not provide evidence for a homologous association per se. In contrast, evaluation of the interphase positioning of the two chromosome 1 segments fits the random expectation in amniotic fluid and fibroblast cells, while in experiments using lymphocytes a slight excess of larger distances between these homologous targets was occasionally observed. 2D-distances between the labeled chromosome 1 and 15 segments showed a large variability in their relative positioning. In conclusion our data do not support the idea of a strict and permanent association of these homologous and nonhomologous targets in the cell types studied so far.

References (44)

  • S.M. Gasser et al.

    Trends Genet

    (1987)
  • T. Cremer et al.

    Exp. Cell Res

    (1988)
  • B.A. Ochs et al.

    Differentiation

    (1983)
  • A.H.N. Hopman et al.

    Exp. Cell Res

    (1987)
  • G.Y. Hadlaczky et al.

    Exp. Cell Res

    (1986)
  • L. Manuelidis
  • G. Blobel
  • T. Cremer et al.

    Ann. Univ. Sarav. Med. (Suppl.)

    (1987)
  • H.J. Cooke et al.

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1979)
  • M.J. Higgins et al.

    Chromosoma

    (1985)
  • H.S. Chandra et al.

    J. Genet. Hum

    (1972)
  • H. Galperin-Lemaitre et al.

    Hum. Genet

    (1977)
  • A. Sinkus et al.

    Hum. Genet

    (1980)
  • H.D. Hager et al.

    Hum. Genet

    (1982)
  • C.H. Ockey

    Chromosoma

    (1969)
  • T.C. Rodman et al.

    Hum. Genet

    (1978)
  • C. Wollenberg et al.

    Hum. Genet

    (1982)
  • M. Schmid et al.

    Cytogenet. Cell Genet

    (1975)
  • A. Stahl et al.

    Hum. Genet

    (1976)
  • T. Maniatis et al.
  • P.R. Langer et al.
  • R.M.K. Dale et al.

    Biochemistry

    (1975)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Changes of higher order chromatin arrangements during major genome activation in bovine preimplantation embryos

      2009, Experimental Cell Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gene-dense CTs were found more internally and gene-poor CTs more peripherally. In nuclei of cultured human fibroblasts, which have a shape resembling a flat cylinder or ellipsoid [16] a size-dependent distribution of CTs was found [8,10,17]. Moreover it was shown that the nuclear equator was preferentially occupied by CTs of the largest human chromosomes, apparently forcing CTs of small chromosomes, such as HSA 17–22 and Y towards the nuclear center despite large differences in their gene-density [8].

    • Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei

      2000, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      We postulated that significant differences in size (and therefore mass) among human chromosomes would allow us to examine a size-dependent distribution of chromosomes within the G1 interphase nucleus. Fluorescence in situ hybridization provides a powerful tool for visualizing the localization of specific regions of chromosomes within G1 interphase nuclei (Rappold et al., 1984; Emmerich et al., 1989; Popp et al., 1990; Hofers et al., 1993a, b; Chandley et al., 1996). The location of specific chromosomal sites can be detected in whole mounts of fibroblast cells by direct microscopic examination.

    • Spectral imaging of red blood cells in experimental anemia of Cyprinus carpio

      2000, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Molecular and Integrative Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by a Heisenbergstipendium of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for T. Cremer and by a Biostipendium of the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie for P. Emmerich and A. Jauch.

    View full text