Fucoidin inhibits attachment of guinea pig spermatozoa to the zona pellucida through binding to the inner acrosomal membrane and equatorial domains

https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(84)90606-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Our previous study has shown that fucoidin, an algal heteropolysaccharide, is a potent inhibitor of sperm-zona binding in the guinea pig, hamster and human. To visualize the surface site of fucoidin binding, a biotinated derivative (B-Fuc) of the native fucoidin was prepared. B-Fuc retained the inhibitory activity and was used in conjunction with FITC-avidin to localize its binding sites on guinea pig spermatozoa using fluorescence microscopy. In living acrosome-reacted spermatozoa, B-Fuc bound predominantly to the inner acrosomal membrane and equatorial segment domains. The binding was effectively competed by a 10-fold excess of native fucoidin, but not by a 10-fold excess of heparin or a 20-fold excess of biotinated normal rabbit serum IgG. B-Fuc binding patterns on dead spermatozoa were quite different from that of living spermatozoa. The post-acrosomal region, rather than the inner acrosomal membrane and equatorial domains, was intensely labeled. This indicates the importance of using living cells in assessing true surface binding sites whenever possible. We conclude that the inner acrosomal membrane and/or equatorial domains are critical for zona binding in the guinea pig.

References (36)

  • K Ahuja

    Exp cell res

    (1982)
  • EA Bayer et al.

    Biochim biophys acta

    (1979)
  • JD Bleil et al.

    Dev biol

    (1980)
  • JD Bleil et al.

    Cell

    (1980)
  • P Cuatrecasas

    J biol chem

    (1970)
  • JM Greve et al.

    Cell

    (1982)
  • JK Koehler

    Int rev cytol

    (1978)
  • DG Myles et al.

    Cell

    (1981)
  • DM Phillips et al.

    J ultrast res

    (1980)
  • PK Smith et al.

    Anal biochem

    (1980)
  • W Baranska et al.

    J exp zool

    (1975)
  • EL Bearer et al.

    J cell biol

    (1982)
  • JD Bleil et al.
  • GP Bolwell et al.

    J cell sci

    (1980)
  • P Cuatrecasas et al.
  • M Dubois et al.

    Anal biochem

    (1956)
  • BS Dunbar et al.

    Biochemistry

    (1980)
  • AD Fleming et al.

    Gam res

    (1981)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Defending the Zygote: Search for the Ancestral Animal Block to Polyspermy

      2005, Current Topics in Developmental Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, in vitro insemination with a wide range of serine protease inhibitors never completely inhibits eutherian fertilization (Takano et al., 1993), and acrosin‐null sperm are still able to fertilize eggs, albeit with a 30‐min delay in sperm penetration compared to heterozygous or wild type genotypes (Adham et al., 1997; Baba et al., 1994; Honda et al., 2002; Nayernia et al., 2002). The retention of acrosin on the surface of acrosome‐reacted sperm, particularly at domains most available for ECM binding, suggests an alternative role for acrosin as a tether that maintains sperm–egg interactions (Castellani‐Ceresa et al., 1983; Howes et al., 2001; Huang and Yanagimachi, 1984; Jones, 1991; Noguchi and Nakano, 1992; Sawada, 2002; Urch and Patel, 1991). Acrosin could also be involved with the dispersal and/or activation of acrosome proteins (Honda et al., 2002; Takano et al., 1993; Yamagata et al., 1998b) because the presence of endogenous levels of activity during fertilization is consistently associated with a selective advantage over sperm with low levels of activity, as observed in mice (Adham et al., 1997; Yamagata et al., 1998a) and humans (Cui et al., 2000; Shimizu et al., 1997).

    • The glycobiology of gametes and fertilisation

      1999, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - General Subjects
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by USPHS grants HD-03402 and HD05944-03.

    View full text