Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex☆
Abstract
Following damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, humans develop a defect in real-life decision-making, which contrasts with otherwise normal intellectual functions. Currently, there is no neuropsychological probe to detect in the laboratory, and the cognitive and neural mechanisms responsible for this defect have resisted explanation. Here, using a novel task which simulates real-life decision-making in the way it factors uncertainty of premises and outcomes, as well as reward and punishment, we find that prefrontal patients, unlike controls, are oblivious to the future consequences of their actions, and seem to be guided by immediate prospects only. This finding offers, for the first time, the possibility of detecting these patients' elusive impairment in the laboratory, measuring it, and investigating its possible causes.
References (10)
- M. Petrides et al.
Deficits on subject-ordered tasks after frontal and temporal-lobe lesions in man
Neuropsychologia
(1982) - J.L. Saver et al.
Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage
Neuropsychologia
(1991) - T. Shallice et al.
The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation
Cortex
(1978) - A.R. Damasio
Descartes' error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain
(1994) - A.R. Damasio et al.
Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior
Cited by (4505)
Association between endocrine and neuropsychological endophenotypes and gambling disorder severity
2024, Addictive BehaviorsBackground: Neurobiological characteristics have been identified regarding the severity of gambling disorder (GD). The aims of this study were: (1) to examine, through a path analysis, whether there was a relationship between neuroendocrine features, potentially mediational GD variables, and GD severity, and (2) to associate neuroendocrine variables, with GD severity-related variables according to gambling preferences. Methods: The sample included 297 outpatients with GD. We analyzed endocrine concentrations of different appetite-related hormones (ghrelin, liver antimicrobial peptide 2 [LEAP-2], leptin, adiponectin), and neuropsychological performance (working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibition, decision making, premorbid intelligence). Path analysis assessed mechanisms between neuroendocrine features and GD severity, including mediational GD variables (impulsivity traits and gambling-related cognitive distortions). Partial correlations evaluated the associations between neuroendocrine variables, including impulsivity traits, and variables related to GD severity (DSM-5, South Oaks Gambling Screen, illness duration, and gambling-related cognitive distortions). Results: Lower adiponectin concentrations predicted greater GD severity, while higher LEAP-2 concentrations predicted more gambling-related cognitive distortions. Likewise, better neuropsychological performance directly predicted GD severity, but worse neuropsychological performance was associated with GD severity through the mediational variables of impulsivity traits and gambling-related cognitive distortions. Also, in non-strategic individuals with GD, poor working memory was associated with gambling expectancies and predictive control. In strategic individuals with GD, poor cognitive flexibility was associated with illusion of control, predictive control, and inability to stop gambling. Conclusions: These results provide updated information about the comprehension of the interaction between neuroendocrine features, clinical variables, and severity of GD. Thus, neurobiological functions seem to be strongly related to GD severity.
To explore or exploit: Individual differences in preschool decision making
2024, Cognitive DevelopmentResearch suggests a pattern of moderate early exploration (shifting from deck to deck) followed by exploitation (consistent choice from advantageous decks) characterizes good decision makers. The main goal of the current study was to use a person centered (latent profile analysis) to explore individual differences in strategy use for preschoolers (n = 274) on a variant of the Iowa Gambling task (IGT). The analysis resulted in three profiles: a profile made up of younger children who showed moderate initial exploration, but no exploitation, a profile of children who showed consistent high exploration, and a profile made up older children who showed initial exploration followed by high exploitation in the last half of the game. The profiles showed striking differences in choice and awareness on the preschool IGT variant. Examination of strategy use during decision making in young children has the potential to provide insight into early adaptive functioning.
A latent profile approach to the study of conspiracy belief: Identifying the role of executive functioning
2024, Personality and Individual DifferencesThe proliferation of conspiracy theories has coincided with advancement in communication technologies. Research has consistently identified the social determinants of conspiracy beliefs, such as social media exposure and peer influence, the impact of cognitive abilities, especially executive function (EF), remains unexplored. This study aimed to explore whether conspiracy beliefs varied with different EF profiles. A sample of 194 participants (M = 35.56; SD = 10.01) completed a questionnaire covering beliefs in six common conspiracy theories and tasks assessing working memory (N-Back), cognitive flexibility (Modified Card Sorting Task), and affective decision-making (Iowa Gambling Task). Latent profile analysis on the cognitive tests identified three distinct EF profiles: Low Cool EF, Moderate Cool EF, and High EF. Notably, the Low Cool EF cohort displayed significantly stronger beliefs in five of the six conspiracy theories than the High EF profile. The Moderate Cool EF profile also showed significantly stronger beliefs in conspiracies relating to personal wellbeing, and Covid-19 compared to the High EF profile. Executive functioning plays a pivotal role in shaping an individual's inclination towards or resistance against conspiracy beliefs. Enhanced cognitive flexibility and working memory enables individuals to critically assess information rather than rigidly subscribing to a singular viewpoint, likely fostering resistance to conspiratorial thinking.
Pathways from prenatal cocaine exposure to adult substance use and behavior
2024, Neurotoxicology and TeratologyThis is a report from the most recent adult follow-up of the longest running cohort study of prenatal cocaine exposure (PCE), in which women were enrolled prenatally and offspring were assessed in infancy, childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. In previous studies, PCE was linked to offspring behavior problems such as early substance use and externalizing behavior problems. The current analyses examine pathways from PCE to behavioral outcomes in offspring at the 25-year assessment. Prenatal cocaine exposure was moderate in this cohort; most women decreased or discontinued use after the first trimester. During the first and third trimesters, 38% and 11% used cocaine, respectively. This represents the most common pattern of PCE in non-treatment samples. At this phase, the adult offspring were, on average, 27.3 years old (range = 25–30), had 13.4 years of education, 83% were employed, 55% were Black, and 55% were female. Offspring who were exposed to cocaine during the first trimester were significantly more likely to use marijuana in the past year, report more arrests, and have poorer scores on a decision-making task, controlling for other prenatal substance exposure, demographic, and socioeconomic factors. In mediation analyses, there were indirect pathways from PCE to current marijuana use through early initiation of marijuana use and 21-year marijuana use, and through 15-year status offenses and 21-year marijuana use. There was also an indirect pathway from PCE to lifetime arrests through early initiation of marijuana use and 21-year Conduct Disorder, although the direct pathway from PCE to arrests also remained significant. These findings are consistent with those from previous phases and are an indication that there are detrimental associations with PCE that persist across developmental stages and into adulthood.
The impact of risk preference on decision-making during evacuation: Behavioral and physiological analysis using event-related potential signals
2024, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionIndividuals with different cognitive and personality traits may be required to serve as evacuees during a fire or other emergencies. We investigated how the personality trait of risk preference influences the decision-making strategy of fire evacuees, and classified evacuees by different risk preferences to reveal behavioral and neurophysiological differences associated with different preference categories. Event-related potentials and reaction times were recorded as 49 healthy participants performed an emergency decision-making task that required them to choose between two escape routes by considering route distance and fire severity. Our simulated evacuation experiment revealed the participants’ risk-taking preferences during emergency evacuation. All participants were classified into three statistically different groups (risk-averse group; risk-neutral group; risk-seeking group). We found that evacuees determined their risk preference early and preferred to maintain their original decision-making strategy rather than change it frequently. Our findings indicate that, when participants selected an option against their risk preference, they demonstrated longer reaction time and used more cognitive and attentional resources. This difference is shown by the significant difference in reaction times, P300 amplitudes, and activity on topographic scalp maps. Our study is the first to identify physiological changes that correspond with different risk preferences during evacuation decision-making and explain more fully how evacuees make emergency decisions in the context of fire. Future research should examine these findings in a larger sample size.
Dual-process modeling of sequential decision making in the balloon analogue risk task
2024, Cognitive PsychologyPeople are often faced with repeated risky decisions that involve uncertainty. In sequential risk-taking tasks, like the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), the underlying decision process is not yet fully understood. Dual-process theory proposes that human cognition involves two main families of processes, often referred to as System 1 (fast and automatic) and System 2 (slow and conscious). We cross models of the BART with different architectures of the two systems to yield a pool of computational dual-process models that are evaluated on multiple performance measures (e.g., parameter identifiability, model recovery, and predictive accuracy). Results show that the best-performing model configuration assumes the two systems are competitively connected, an evaluation process based on the Scaled Target Learning model of the BART, and an assessment rate that incorporates sensitivity to the trial number, pumping opportunity, and bias to engage in System 1. Findings also shed light on how modeling choices and response times in a dual-process framework can benefit our understanding of sequential risk-taking behavior.
- ☆
Supported by NINDS PO1 NS19632 and the James S. McDonnell Foundation.