Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 50, Issue 2, 28 February 1973, Pages 241-264
Brain Research

A quantitative investigation of the development of collateral reinnervation after partial deafferentation of the septal nuclei

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(73)90729-4Get rights and content

Abstract

A quantitative ultrastructural analysis of different types of synapses can yield figures which are highly consistent for the same area from one animal to the next.

  • (1) In the medial and lateral septal nuclei of the rat, 64% of synapses are on dendritic spines, 32% are on dendritic shafts and 4% are on cell somata.

  • (2) After section of the ipsilateral fimbria up to one half of the synapses on dendritic spines but only a small proportion of the synapses on dendritic shafts undergo orthograde degeneration. The degeneration reaches its peak within the first week and is virtually all removed by one month after operation.

  • (3) The number of non-degenerating spine synapses falls to one half of its original value within a week after operation but returns to normal levels by one month. This suggests that almost all the deafferented dendritic spines may be reinnervated.

  • (4) The number of axon terminals seen making more than one synaptic contact in the plane of section increases progressively from its normal low level to reach a maximum at about one month after operation. It is argued that these multiple synaptic contacts arise because of reinnervation of neighbouring vacated sites by pre-existing axon terminals in the region. In the formation of multiple synapses axon terminals already contacting dendritic spines are involved more often than can be explained on the basis of their proximity to the deafferented sites.

  • (5) For the first few weeks after operation synaptic thickenings may be seen unapposed by axon terminals; at later stages these configurations become less common. This suggests that synaptic thickenings persist after deafferentation but that they exist for only a brief period in a non-synaptic form.

Collateral reinnervation is not random — it is a quantitatively predictable phenomenon, following a rigid time course and resulting in a characteristic pattern of synapse formation.

Reference (44)

  • ScottD. et al.

    Factors promoting regeneration of spinal neurons: positive influence of nerve growth factor

  • AdamsJ.H. et al.

    Degeneration and regeneration of hypothalamic nerve fibres in the neurohypophysis after pituitary stalk section in the ferret

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1969)
  • AdamsJ.H. et al.

    Changes in the hypothalamus associated will regeneration of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial tract after pituitary stalk section in the ferret

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1971)
  • Ande´nN.-E. et al.

    Ascending monoamine neurons to the telencephalon and diencephalon

    Acta physiol. scand.

    (1966)
  • CajalS. Ramo´n y

    Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System

    (1928)
  • DaitzH.M. et al.

    Studies of the connexions of the fornix system

    J. Neurol. Psychiat.

    (1954)
  • DiamondJ. et al.

    The function of the dendritic spine: an hypothesis

  • EddsM.V.

    Collateral nerve regeneration

    Quart. Rev. Biol.

    (1953)
  • FieldP.M.

    A quantitative ultrastural analysis of the distribution of amygdaloid fibres in the preoptic area and the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1972)
  • GazeR.M.

    The Formation of Nerve Connections

    (1970)
  • GlobusA. et al.

    Loss of dendritic spines as an index of pre-synaptic terminal patterns

    Nature (Lond.)

    (1966)
  • GoodmanD.C. et al.

    Sprouting of optic tract projections in the brain stem of the rat

    J. comp. Neurol.

    (1966)
  • Cited by (394)

    • Astrocytic role in synapse formation after injury

      2016, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fig. 1, taken from the material of the 1969 study, illustrates the PAPs associated with what much later came to be called the tripartite synapse (Haydon, 2001; Perea et al., 2009). In 1973 we showed the PAPs to be an essential intermediary mediating both synapse removal and new synapse formation (Raisman and Field, 1973; Field and Raisman, 1983) in partially denervated neuropil. Fig. 2 shows how rapid and precisely targeted is the localised astrocytic hypertrophy to degenerating neuronal material (Cf. Watts et al., 2004).

    • Cellular and molecular neuronal plasticity

      2015, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A neuroplasticity response to brain injury has been observed in humans (e.g., Weiller et al., 1992; Chu et al., 2000) and animals (e.g., Ip et al., 2002). Reorganization after injury has been proposed as a mechanism to facilitate recovery (Raisman and Field, 1973; Kleim et al., 2003; Stein and Hoffman, 2003; Dancause et al., 2005). Likewise, endogenous reparative processes indicative of regenerative sprouting are observed after experimental TBI.

    • Morphology of single olivocerebellar axons in the denervation-reinnervation model produced by subtotal lesion of the rat inferior olive

      2012, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results indicate reinnervation in thin collaterals in the cerebellar nuclei and in the granular layer, besides predominant reinnervation in the molecular layer at CF terminals. These terminal formations seem to obey the general axonal response to partial deafferentation of target neurons (Raisman and Field, 1973). Reinnervation of the cerebellar nuclei by transcommissural sprouting of olivocerebellar axons has been seen after neonatal deafferentation by hemipedunculotomy (Sugihara et al., 2003).

    • Chapter 55 Neural transplantation

      2009, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text