Lac repressor binding to operator analogues: Comparison of poly[d(A-T)], poly[d(A-BrU)], and poly[d(A-U)]

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(71)90195-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Previous work has established that Escherichia coli lac repressor binds strongly to poly[d(A-T)]. Here we use competition experiments to measure repressor binding to synthetic DNA's related to this polymer. Poly[d(A-BrU)] competes about forty times more effectively for repressor than does poly[d(A-T)], whereas poly[d(A-U)] competes twenty fold less effectively. This result suggests that the atom or group occupying the 5-position of the pyrimidine ring is important for recognition by repressor.

References (17)

  • M. Chamberlin et al.

    J. Mol. Biol

    (1964)
  • A.D. Riggs et al.

    J. Mol. Biol

    (1968)
  • A.D. Riggs et al.

    J. Mol. Biol

    (1970)
  • C.C. Richardson et al.

    J. Biol. Chem

    (1964)
  • R.G. Wake et al.

    J. Mol. Biol

    (1962)
  • M. Chamberlin et al.

    J. Mol. Biol

    (1963)
  • R.B. Inman et al.

    J. Mol. Biol

    (1962)
  • R.L. Erikson et al.

    Virology

    (1964)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (36)

  • The binding of androgen receptor to DNA and RNA

    1981, BBA Section Nucleic Acids And Protein Synthesis
View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (1-R01-HD04420) and the National Science Foundation (GB-26517).

View full text