Scientific paper
Abnormal mammographic findings: A critical appraisal,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90130-2Get rights and content

Abstract

We performed a 1 year review of mammographic interpretations and breast biopsy experiences at Madigan Army Medical Center, correlating biopsy results with mammographic interpretations when possible. Fibrocystic mammary dysplasia was reported in two thirds of our patients, with interpretations heavily weighted toward findings of moderate or severe dysplasia. Sixteen percent of our patients had indeterminate or suspicious mammograms, and only 11 percent of the mammograms were read as normal. Of 19 patients who underwent needle-directed biopsy for nonpalpable lesions and suspicious or indeterminate mammograms, two had invasive cancer and one lobular carcinoma in situ. Our data suggest that many patients who have indeterminate mammograms are followed in preference to early biopsy if there is no palpable lesion and no high yield radiologic criteria of malignancy.

References (6)

  • G Frankl et al.

    Xeromammography and 1200 breast cancers

    Radiol Clip North Am

    (1983)
  • M Moskowitz

    Minimal breast cancer redux

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (1983)
  • S Shapiro

    Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial

    Cancer

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

☆☆

Presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the North Pacific Surgical Association, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, November 11 and 12, 1983.

1

From the General Surgery Service, Madigan Army Medical Center, and the Western Clinic, Tacoma, Washington.

View full text