Efficacy of flecainide for the reversion of acute onset atrial fibrillation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(92)91078-IGet rights and content

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of intravenous flecainide to convert recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) (present for ≥30 minutes and ≤72 hours and a ventricular response ≥120 beats/min) was investigated. A total of 102 patients without severe heart or circulatory failure were randomized to receive either intravenous flecainide (2 mg/kg, maximum dose 150 mg; 51 patients) or placebo (51 patients) in a double-blind trial. Digoxin (500 μg intravenously) was administered to all patients who had not previously been receiving digoxin. The electrocardiogram was monitored continuously during the study. In 29 (57%) patients stable sinus rhythm was restored within 1 hour after flecainide and in only 7 (14%) given placebo (chi square 18.9; p = 0.000013; odds ratio 8.3; 95% confidence interval 2.9–24.8). Reversion to sinus rhythm within 1 hour after starting the trial medication was considered a pretrial end point and likely to be due to a drug effect. At the end of the 6-hour monitoring period, 34 patients (67%) in the flecainide group were in sinus rhythm whereas only 18 (35%) in the placebo group had reverted (chi square 8.83, p = 0.003; odds ratio 3.67; 95% confidence interval 1.5–9.1). Significant hypotension, although short lived, was more common in the flecainide group. One patient given flecainide developed torsades de pointes and was successfully electrically cardioverted. Flecainide is useful for the management of recent-onset AF both for control of the ventricular response and conversion to sinus rhythm. The benefits of reversion to sinus rhythm must, however, be weighed against potential proarrhythmic and negative inotropic effects, especially when poor left ventricular function is present.

References (31)

  • IG Crozier et al.

    Flecainide acetate for conversion acute supraventricular tachycardia to sinus rhythm

    Am J Cardiol

    (1987)
  • RH Falk et al.

    Digoxin for converting recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a randomized double-blind trial

    Am Intern Med

    (1987)
  • DM Roden et al.

    Flecainide

    N Engl J Med

    (1986)
  • KJ Hellestrand et al.

    Acute electrophysiological effects of flecainide acetate on cardiac conduction and refractoriness in man

    Br Heart J

    (1982)
  • AW Nathan et al.

    Intravenous flecainide acetate for the clinical management of paroxysmal tachycardias

    Clin Cardiol

    (1987)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Use of Flecainide for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

      2020, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Overall, the conversion rate with flecainide ranged from 57% to 80%, higher than the conversion rate with placebo which ranged from 14% to 37%. The study with the 8-hour end point59 utilized oral flecainide, whereas the other 3 studies56–58 utilized IV flecainide. The lower conversion rates observed in 2 studies56,57 are likely due to the shorter end point times at which conversion efficacy was assessed.

    • Intravenous Flecainide for Emergency Department Management of Acute Atrial Fibrillation

      2018, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      All studies used i.v. flecainide at a dose of 2 mg/kg infused over 10–30 min. Three trials were versus placebo, and three had verapamil control arms (13,15,16–18,22). The primary endpoint of five studies was cardioversion to sinus rhythm in ≤ 1 h.

    • Unusual severe hemodynamic failure associated with standard dose of intravenous flecainide for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

      2017, HeartRhythm Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Particularly it is contraindicated in patients with stenotic coronary artery disease and/or myocardial ischemia and those with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and/or congestive heart failure. Several side effects, such as negative inotropy and facilitation of AV conduction, need to be considered; however, the overall safety-risk profile is very good.1 Most physicians consider to give it with co-medication of ß-blocker therapy.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by a grant from 3M Pharmaceuticals, St. Paul, Minnesota.

    View full text