Unified elasto-plastic associated and non-associated constitutive model and its engineering applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00306-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A unified elasto-plastic associated and non-associated constitutive model, which is based on the unified theory, is proposed in this paper. This unified constitutive model can be easily used and has been implemented in UEPP (unified elasto-plastic finite element program). This new elasto-plastic constitutive model can be widely used in engineering.

Section snippets

Unified strength theory

Strength theory is usually called the yield criterion for metallic materials, the failure criterion for granular materials (concrete, soil and rock) or the material model for non-linear finite element analysis. It is important and fundamental for the strength calculation and design of engineering structures. Generally speaking, for any engineering materials, two basic strength properties must be studied, i.e. initial and subsequent yield properties. Initial yield solves the problem of when the

Unified elasto-plastic constitutive model

Associated and non-associated constitutive model based on the unified strength theory can be worked out. For isotropic materials, for the convenience of numerical computation, the unified strength theory is usually expressed in terms of stress (deviatoric) invariants, that is, the first invariant of stress tensor I1, the second and third invariants of stress deviatoric tensor J2 and J3 and stress angle θ. The stress angle θ is defined so as to reflect the σ2 effectθ=13cos−1332J3J32(0≤θ≤π/3)It

Determination of the unified associated elasto-plastic stiffness matrix

According to Ref. [8], here {a}=∂F/{σ} (or {a}=∂F′/{σ}) is defined as the flow vector of the unified strength theory (Eq. (5)), thus{a}=∂F∂{σ}=∂F∂I1∂I1∂{σ}+∂FJ2J2∂{σ}+∂F∂θ∂θ∂{σ}=C1{a1}+C2{a2}+C3{a3}where{a1}=∂I1∂{σ},{a2}=J2∂{σ},{a3}=∂J3∂{σ}C1=∂F∂I1=13(1−α)C2=∂FJ2+ctgJ2∂F∂θ=1+α223cosθ+α(1−b)1+bsinθ+ctgα(1−b)1+bcosθ−1+α223sinθC3=32J32sin∂F∂θ=32J2sin1+α223sinθ−α(1−b)1+bcosθSimilarly, C1, C2 and C3 connected with F′ of the unified strength theory can be expressed asC′1=∂F′∂I1=13

Singular points on the yield surface of the unified elasto-plastic constitutive model

The singular point is the point where the flow vector {a} is not determined uniquely. There are two kinds of singularities, as shown in Fig. 1. One is point at θ=θb where flow vector {a} can be determined either by F or by F′. Because of the existence of difference between the two flow vectors, the singular phenomenon occurs. The other kind of singularity is at point θ=0° and θ=60° where flow vectors {a} can be determined by F and F′, respectively. The singular phenomenon exists when substitute

The implementation of non-associated elasto-plasticity

Because plastic volume dilation calculated by associated plasticity exaggerates the realistic situation for some engineering materials such as soil and concrete, this makes the introduction of non-associated flow rule necessary, as shown in Fig. 3. A common treatment of non-associated plasticity can be found in Refs. [10], [11] by letting plastic potential have the same form as the yield (loading) function but using different frictional angles, i.e. ψ for plastic potential and ϕ for yield

Tests, applications and verification

In order to test the validity of the above discussion and make the application possible, a computer code, unified elasto-plastic finite element program (UEPP) has been worked out. Two examples are presented here.

Conclusions

This paper discusses some problems in the implementation of a new unified elasto-plastic constitutive model including associated and non-associated flow rules, solutions of singularities and the choice of material parameters. Explicit formulae are given, which makes the elasto-plastic finite element application easier. Two examples are used to compare the test, computation and theoretical results. Agreements have be achieved among these results, which, in turn, verify the discussion proposed in

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 59779028) to Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. The generous financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (48)

  • An explicit formulation of the macroscopic strength criterion for porous media with pressure and Lode angle dependent matrix under axisymmetric loading

    2021, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    The unified yield criterion can fully retrieve the Tresca criterion and linearly approximate the Von Mises criterion. To account for the effect of normal stresses on the yielding, Yu et al. (1999) further developed the unified strength theory, which is capable of retrieving the unified yield criterion and MC criterion. A complete review of the development of Yu's strength theory can be found in Yu (2018).

  • Non-orthogonal elastoplastic constitutive model with the critical state for clay

    2019, Computers and Geotechnics
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is also called the non-orthogonal conditions, but the non-orthogonality with respect to the yield surface is accomplished by constructing a new plastic potential function [14–17]. However, it is difficult to construct a required plastic potential function, especially for geomaterials with pressure sensitivity and dilatancy [18–22]. In addition, some additional parameters without clear physical meanings might be needed.

  • An elasto-plastic constitutive model for soft rock considering mobilization of strength

    2016, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition)
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text