Unified elasto-plastic associated and non-associated constitutive model and its engineering applications
Section snippets
Unified strength theory
Strength theory is usually called the yield criterion for metallic materials, the failure criterion for granular materials (concrete, soil and rock) or the material model for non-linear finite element analysis. It is important and fundamental for the strength calculation and design of engineering structures. Generally speaking, for any engineering materials, two basic strength properties must be studied, i.e. initial and subsequent yield properties. Initial yield solves the problem of when the
Unified elasto-plastic constitutive model
Associated and non-associated constitutive model based on the unified strength theory can be worked out. For isotropic materials, for the convenience of numerical computation, the unified strength theory is usually expressed in terms of stress (deviatoric) invariants, that is, the first invariant of stress tensor I1, the second and third invariants of stress deviatoric tensor J2 and J3 and stress angle θ. The stress angle θ is defined so as to reflect the σ2 effectIt
Determination of the unified associated elasto-plastic stiffness matrix
According to Ref. [8], here {a}=∂F/∂{σ} (or {a}=∂F′/∂{σ}) is defined as the flow vector of the unified strength theory (Eq. (5)), thuswhereSimilarly, C′1, C′2 and C′3 connected with F′ of the unified strength theory can be expressed as
Singular points on the yield surface of the unified elasto-plastic constitutive model
The singular point is the point where the flow vector {a} is not determined uniquely. There are two kinds of singularities, as shown in Fig. 1. One is point at θ=θb where flow vector {a} can be determined either by F or by F′. Because of the existence of difference between the two flow vectors, the singular phenomenon occurs. The other kind of singularity is at point θ=0° and θ=60° where flow vectors {a} can be determined by F and F′, respectively. The singular phenomenon exists when substitute
The implementation of non-associated elasto-plasticity
Because plastic volume dilation calculated by associated plasticity exaggerates the realistic situation for some engineering materials such as soil and concrete, this makes the introduction of non-associated flow rule necessary, as shown in Fig. 3. A common treatment of non-associated plasticity can be found in Refs. [10], [11] by letting plastic potential have the same form as the yield (loading) function but using different frictional angles, i.e. ψ for plastic potential and ϕ for yield
Tests, applications and verification
In order to test the validity of the above discussion and make the application possible, a computer code, unified elasto-plastic finite element program (UEPP) has been worked out. Two examples are presented here.
Conclusions
This paper discusses some problems in the implementation of a new unified elasto-plastic constitutive model including associated and non-associated flow rules, solutions of singularities and the choice of material parameters. Explicit formulae are given, which makes the elasto-plastic finite element application easier. Two examples are used to compare the test, computation and theoretical results. Agreements have be achieved among these results, which, in turn, verify the discussion proposed in
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 59779028) to Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. The generous financial support is gratefully acknowledged.
References (12)
Twin shear stress yield criterion
Int J Mech Sci
(1983)A close-form solution of stiffness matrix for Tresca and Mohr–Coulomb plasticity models
Comput Struct
(1994)- et al.
Strength theory for rock and concrete: history, now and development
Prog Nat Sci
(1998) - et al.
Twin shear stress theory and its generalization
Sci Sin, Ser A
(1985) - et al.
Generalized twin shear stress yield criterion and its generalization
Chin Sci Bull
(1992) - et al.
A new model and theory on yield and failure of materials under the complex stress state
Cited by (48)
A state-dependent non-orthogonal elastoplastic constitutive model for sand
2024, Computers and GeotechnicsAn elastoplastic damage constitutive model for capturing dynamic enhancement effect of rock and concrete through equivalent stress history
2023, International Journal of Impact EngineeringExperimental study on the mechanical and failure behaviors of deep rock subjected to true triaxial stress: A review
2022, International Journal of Mining Science and TechnologyAn explicit formulation of the macroscopic strength criterion for porous media with pressure and Lode angle dependent matrix under axisymmetric loading
2021, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The unified yield criterion can fully retrieve the Tresca criterion and linearly approximate the Von Mises criterion. To account for the effect of normal stresses on the yielding, Yu et al. (1999) further developed the unified strength theory, which is capable of retrieving the unified yield criterion and MC criterion. A complete review of the development of Yu's strength theory can be found in Yu (2018).
Non-orthogonal elastoplastic constitutive model with the critical state for clay
2019, Computers and GeotechnicsCitation Excerpt :It is also called the non-orthogonal conditions, but the non-orthogonality with respect to the yield surface is accomplished by constructing a new plastic potential function [14–17]. However, it is difficult to construct a required plastic potential function, especially for geomaterials with pressure sensitivity and dilatancy [18–22]. In addition, some additional parameters without clear physical meanings might be needed.
An elasto-plastic constitutive model for soft rock considering mobilization of strength
2016, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition)