Elsevier

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volume 56, Issue 5, November 2002, Pages 720-730
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Review Article
Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2)

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70123-5Get rights and content

Section snippets

Brush cytology

Several studies have evaluated the cancer detection rate of brush cytology since the first description by Osnes et al.1 in 1975. Brushing is the most frequently used tissue sampling technique and can be performed for most biliary strictures detected at ERCP. It is technically easy, requires little time, and is generally safe.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Endobiliary forceps biopsy

The endobiliary forceps biopsy provides a sample of bile duct tissue deep to the epithelium, theoretically obviating the problem of inadequate sampling that may occur with brushing. This technique is more time consuming than brushing and is less widely used.

Biopsy specimens can be obtained from biliary strictures at ERCP by using forceps made for use with standard and pediatric upper endoscopes, or malleable forceps.9, 29 After performing a sphincterotomy, the forceps is passed through the

Multimodal tissue sampling

Several studies have shown that combining several techniques for obtaining tissue samples from biliary strictures at ERCP enhances the detection of cancer (Table 3).9, 21, 28, 34, 38

. Results of multimodal tissue sampling for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures, when high-grade atypia is considered equivalent to cancer

TechniqueSeSpePPVNPV
Brush30%*100%100%28%
FNA30%†100%100%28%
Biopsy43%‡90%94%31%
Brush + FNA39%§100%100%32%
Brush + biopsy55%90%95%36%
FNA + biopsy53%90%95%35%
Brush + FNA + biopsy

Improving the diagnostic yield of tissue sampling at ERCP

Currently, the cancer detection rate when sampling biliary stricture is clearly less than that for endoscopic sampling of lesions in the esophagus, stomach, and colon. Thus, new and better techniques are needed.

Conclusions

Ideally, the initial steps in the approach to malignant obstructive jaundice should establish whether the patient is a candidate for surgery and whether the tumor is potentially resectable. The former is determined by clinical evaluation of the patient and the latter by staging US and CT. If the patient is considered a surgical candidate and the tumor potentially resectable based on CT findings, there is little or no role for ERCP and concurrent tissue sampling.63 The patient should undergo EUS

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (69)

  • T Ponchon et al.

    Value of endobiliary brush cytology and biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant bile duct stenosis: results of a prospective study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1995)
  • AK Rustgi et al.

    Malignant tumors of the bile ducts: diagnosis by biopsy during endoscopic cannulation

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1989)
  • V Pugliese et al.

    Endoscopic retrograde forceps biopsy and brush cytology of biliary strictures: a prospective study

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1995)
  • J Vandervoort et al.

    Use of a new angled forceps to biopsy pancreatic and biliary strictures [abstract]

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1997)
  • AP Ferrari et al.

    Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1994)
  • DE McGuire et al.

    Brush cytology for pancreatic carcinoma: an analysis of factors influencing results

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1996)
  • PR Tarnasky et al.

    Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

    Gastroenterology

    (1998)
  • EL Fogel et al.

    Does placement of a small diameter, long length, unflanged pancreatic duct stent reduce the incidence of post ERCP pancreatitis? [abstract]

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2000)
  • V Pugliese et al.

    Pancreatic intraductal sampling during ERCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: cytologic studies and k-ras-2 codon 12 molecular analysis in 47 cases

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2001)
  • ME Ryan et al.

    Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreatobiliary strictures

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1994)
  • A Rumalla et al.

    Improved diagnostic yield of endoscopic biliary brush cytology by digital image analysis

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (2001)
  • H Iguchi et al.

    Analysis of Ki-ras codon 12 mutations in the duodenal juice of patients with pancreatic cancer

    Gastroenterology

    (1996)
  • JG Lee et al.

    Diagnostic utility of K-ras mutational analysis on bile obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1995)
  • JV Van Laethem et al.

    Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1998)
  • KJ Chang et al.

    The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1997)
  • GC Hunt et al.

    Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining respectability of pancreatic cancer: a review

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2002)
  • M Osnes et al.

    Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology (ERBC) of the biliary and pancreatic ducts

    Scand J Gastroenterol

    (1975)
  • JG Lee et al.

    Benign, dysplastic, or malignant—making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1995)
  • JW O'Donohue et al.

    Brush cytology in the investigation of biliary strictures: a prospective study [abstract]

    Gut

    (1997)
  • PG Foutch et al.

    Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (1990)
  • MN de Peralta-Venturina et al.

    Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures. A study of 74 cases

    Diagn Cytopathol

    (1996)
  • TH Baron et al.

    An in vitro randomized prospective study to maximize cellular yield during bile duct brush cytology

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (1994)
  • JC Mansfield et al.

    A prospective evaluation of cytology from biliary strictures

    Gut

    (1997)
  • CJR Stewart et al.

    Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases

    J Clin Pathol

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    Reprint requests: Glen A. Lehman, MD, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, 550 N. University Blvd., Suite 2300 Indianapolis, IN 46202.

    View full text