Analysis of degassing time of pressurized water reactor pressurizer
Introduction
The Small and Medium sized Reactors (SMRs) (Rowinski et al., 2015) are those reactors whose power are lower than 700 MWe, which are more suitable to supply electricity to remote places and to create more distributed energy systems. The SMRs have been focused by many countries. e.g., China is developing a pressurized water reactor which will be placed on a boat and it will become an offshore nuclear power plant for island and offshore platform for electricity generation, sea water desalination and even hydrogen generation (Hu and Guo, 2018).
In the course of operation of a SMR, some fission gases (e.g., krypton and xenon) may dissolve in the reactor coolant as fuel elements become defective. After the shutdown, but before the start of refueling and maintenance operations, the concentration of hydrogen and radioactive gases must be reduced to avoid maintenance personnel being exposed to excessive radiation. Moreover, this reduction will further reduce the possibility of an explosion caused by a potential spark igniting a flammable mixture of hydrogen and air in the containment. Therefore, it is necessary to purify the reactor coolant after the shutdown.
This paper focuses on a typical pressurized water SMR and its degassing method has been chosen carefully. There are various patents (Marie, 1965, Goeldner, 1969, Gramer and Korn, 1974, Kausz et al., 1976, Battaglia and Fleming, 1987, Corpora, 2015) to purify the reactor coolant as shown in Table 1. However, some of the methods require additional equipment and complicated operation. Since the space of a SMR is usually narrow, it is better to use as much equipment which is already present in the reactor installations as possible and to make its purification operation as simple as possible. The method by using reactor pressurizers as thermal degassing apparatus (Gramer and Korn, 1974) is recommended in this paper.
The degassing process is schematically shown in Fig. 1. The pressurizer is connected with the hot leg of the reactor coolant, the cold leg of the reactor coolant and the adsorption device through the surge line, the spray line and the degassing line, respectively. The electric heater remains open during the degassing process. The non-condensable gases (hydrogen and fission gases) dissolved in reactor coolant enter the pressurizer through the spray line. Then the gases may be expelled from the spray droplets to the gas phase space of the pressurizer. The remaining non-condensable gases dissolved in the droplets fall into the liquid phase space of the pressurizer. Some of the gases may enter the gas space again along with the rising bubbles and the remaining flows back to the reactor coolant through the surge line. The mixture of the steam and non-condensable gases is discharged from the gas space to the absorption device through the degassing line. Pure water is supplied to the reactor coolant system through the water supply system. As the process continues, degassing of the reactor coolant can be achieved.
The degassing by the pressurizer has been proven effective (Gramer and Korn, 1974, Caldwell, 1956, Shen, 1988). However, the theoretical analysis of degassing process and the optimization of degassing time are rarely open-published. Caldwell (Caldwell, 1956) did a degassing hydrogen experiment and proposed a degassing hydrogen efficiency calculation method. Shen (1988) studied the pressurizer degassing efficiency of both hydrogen and fission gases but the exact expression of degassing efficiency is not given. As for the optimization of the pressurizer, most studies (Xu, 1987, He et al., 2010, Liu et al., 2012, Liu et al., 2014, Wang et al., 2016) are focused on the pressurizer volume and weight.
This paper assesses the capability of doing such research and carries three original works. Firstly, the steady-state degassing process of the pressurizer is analyzed and the theoretical degassing model is developed, which is verified by comparing with the experiment (see Section 2). Secondly, the index of the degassing time is given and the influencing factors of the degassing time are analyzed theoretically (see Section 3). Thirdly, based on the thermal-hydraulic restrictions of the pressurizer degassing process, the degassing time optimization scheme of the pressurizer is given and applied to a SMR pressurizer (see Section 4).
Section snippets
Model development
The key features and assumptions of the pressurizer degassing process are:
- 1.
The degassing process has been carried out continuously which is further considered to be in a steady state.
- 2.
The water and steam are considered to be in a saturation state.
- 3.
Non-condensable gases distribute evenly in the gas space as well as in the liquid space.
The degassing process of pressurizers is based on the gas dissolution and transport theory, which can be described by Henry’s law (Henry, 1803). According to Henry’s
Influence factors of degassing time
The degassing time of the reactor coolant directly reflects the degassing effect of the pressurizer. This paper introduces a term “degassing period” as an index of the degassing time. The degassing period is defined byIt can be seen that the degassing period is the time needed for the reactor coolant gas concentration to reduce to 1/e times of its initial value.
Combing Eqs. (22), (23) givesIgnoring heat dissipation (assuming Qg = 0) and combing Eqs. (9), (19),
Objective function and decision variables
Since the degassing period reflects the degassing time, it is considered as the objective function. The degassing process is assumed to be operated under the constant system pressure and constant inlet spray temperature. Therefore, X and Y remain constant. and can be considered as the decision variables. Also, the reactor coolant system water mass W is always constant and known. Therefore, G1 and G2 are considered as the decision variables.
Constraints and expression
To ensure the steady and smooth
Conclusion
This paper studies the thermal degassing characteristics of the pressurizer and presents its application to a SMR pressurizer.
Firstly, the steady-state degassing process of the pressurizer is analyzed and a theoretical pressurizer degassing model is developed and verified with the experiment. The maximum absolute error of the hydrogen concentration is 3.26E−5 m3/kg, which supports the reliability of the model.
Secondly, this paper defines “degassing period” as the index of the degassing time and
References (19)
- et al.
The core instability analysis under ocean condition for offshore floating nuclear power plant with neutron coupling based on multi-point model
Ann. Nucl. Energy
(2018) - et al.
Hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application in nuclear engineering
Ann. Nucl. Energy
(2014) - Battaglia, J.A., Fleming, R.W., 1987. Method of vacuum degassing and refilling a reactor coolant system. U.S. Patent...
Nonlinear programming
- Caldwell, C.S., 1956. Results of Bettis Test Facility Hydrogen Degasification Test. BTF Special Test No....
- Corpora, G.J., 2015. Apparatus for Degassing a Nuclear Reactor Coolant System. U.S. Patent No. 20160225470A1....
- Goeldner, R.W., 1969. Method and apparatus for vapor compression distillation and vapor washing of impure water. U.S....
- Gramer, G., Korn, R., 1974. Thermal degassing of the primary coolant of nuclear reactors. U.S. Patent No. 3789577....
- et al.
Design optimization of pressurizer volume
At. Energy Sci. Technol.
(2010)
Cited by (5)
Simulation and Optimization Study on the Dissolved Hydrogen Precipitation Process in the Liquid Phase of Reactor Pressurizer
2023, 2023 3rd International Conference on Energy, Power and Electrical Engineering, EPEE 2023Research on Design of Pressurizer Degassing System for Small Module Reactors
2021, Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power EngineeringSimulation analysis on the pressurizer degassing sub-system of module small reactor (ACP100)
2020, International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Proceedings, ICONEResearch of PWR pressurizer insurge characteristics on three-dimensional transient modeling
2018, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations