Elsevier

Measurement

Volume 83, April 2016, Pages 29-37
Measurement

Analysis of tunnel displacement accuracy with total station

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.025Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Highway tunnel displacements measurement formulas were presented.

  • The mean error formulas of highway tunnel displacements measurement were derived.

  • Optimal parameters of displacements measurement in highway tunnels were quantified.

Abstract

The remote distance measurement (RDM) method requires only common total stations and not special post-processing software. Moreover, this method is easy to operate and highly accurate results can be obtained. Therefore, RDM is used in the displacement monitoring of tunnel engineering. This study presents the calculation formulas for the crown settlement and wall convergence of tunnel as measured by RDM with total station. The mean error formulas are derived based on error propagation laws. When tunnel displacements measured by using total station with the ms not more than 2 mm + 2D ppm (D is the measurement distance) and mα not more than 1″, the horizontal distance between the rear viewpoint and the monitoring section is in the range of 50–150 m, the horizontal distance between the total station and the monitoring section ranges from 40 m to 60 m, and the total station is near the tunnel centerline, the measurement accuracy can reach 1 mm.

Introduction

Displacement monitoring is an important part of the tunnel construction process [1], and has been used extensively in tunnel engineering. This monitoring process provides data that can be used to determine whether or not a tunnel is structurally stable [2]. In addition, the provided data can help ensure that the tunnel support system is adequately controlled, i.e., an adequate margin of safety is established against collapse, excavation face failure, support system failure, and bottom heave. Tunnel displacement monitoring trends are vital to confirming the geotechnical design of a supporting section to adjust to the unforeseen geological conditions in front of the excavation face. Thereby, significant deviations from estimated completion costs and dates can be prevented [3].

Tunnel displacement monitoring includes wall convergence (horizontal displacement) and crown settlement (vertical displacement). Many measuring technologies have been developed for these processes, including but not limited to: tape extensometers, total station survey (or other geodetic methods), photogrammetric devices, and laser profilers (laser scanners) [4], [5]. Tape extensometers are traditional monitoring technologies, including invar tapes, wires [6], tape distometers [7], and convergence tapes [8], [9], [10]. These technologies have an accuracy of approximately ±0.2 mm over 10–15 m [8], [11]. Simeoni and Zanei [7] estimated the accuracy of convergence measurements, under line length changes of at least 0.08 mm, usually approaches 0.25 mm when tape distometers were employed. Tape extensometers are the most accurate of all common measuring technologies, and they are easy to use and maintain. However, these tools can measure only the displacement along a specific line, and they obstruct the construction process during tape pulling and being read. Furthermore, these tools require much labor and time in the measurement-process.

A total station survey is a non-contact monitoring method that is easy and quick to implement. In accordance with the regulations of technical code for monitoring of railway tunnels (TB10121-2007, China) [12], the measurement of tunnel displacements can be performed using the non-contact measurement of total station. A diaphragm reflector was selected as the measuring point target, which was attached to the parts embedded in the supporting structure. The accuracy of the measurement could reach 0.5–1 mm [12]. In 1995, Song [13] analyzed the non-contact, 3D-displacement measuring method with free stationing, and determined that its accuracy could reach 10−2–10−1 mm level, especially in tunnel cross-section observation. In 2004, Yang et al. [14] proposed a 3D-coordinate, non-contact measurement technique based on two free stations with automatic total station. They also built the corresponding mathematical adjustment model. Moreover, the average absolute error of each 3D-coordinate measuring point could reach 0.8 mm. In 2012, Yuan et al. [15] analyzed non-contact measurement based on 3D free stationing with total station, and noted that the accuracy of measurement by this method could adequately meet the requirements of the code [12] in crown settlement and wall convergence. In addition, only once measurement, both crown settlement and wall convergence could be performed. However, the 3D-measurement requires some special total stations that are usually expensive, along with matched onboard software and post-processing software. Therefore, the cost of the monitoring method is high, and limits its use in tunnel construction. By comparison, the RDM requires only common total station, and no special post-processing software. This method is easy to operate [16], [17]. Moreover, the stationing of this measurement method is flexible, and it is easy to obtain the results that are easily visualized [14]. In 2011, Luo and Chen obtained the deformation of the middle wall of a shallow soil tunnel by RDM with total station [18], [19]. Then, the deformation law of the middle wall was revealed through the analysis of the measurement results.

At present, however, no final conclusion has been drawn regarding to the accuracy of RDM application in tunnel displacement monitoring. In addition, few studies have been carried out on improving the accuracy of tunnel displacement monitoring. Therefore, the accuracy of RDM using a total station in tunnel was analyzed, in this paper. A systematic research was also conducted on the accuracy which was affected by the location of measurement points and total station in tunnel displacement monitoring, according to the RDM principle.

Section snippets

RDM principle of tunnel displacement monitoring with total station

RDM is a measurement method of total station that can indirectly determine the distance and height difference between two points. This method is usually applied to measure two points that are not observed directly, because of existing obstacles, or in certain occasions in which the measuring instrument is difficult to set up or cannot be set up at all between these points.

The principle of RDM in monitoring tunnel displacements with a total station is that the total station can be set up at

RDM accuracy formula

The effect of earth curvature and atmospheric refraction was negligible in this study, due to the short measuring distance and relatively consistent temperature. Eqs. (1), (2), (3) can be transformed by total differentiation as follows:dhPA=sinαAdSA+1ρSAcosαAdαA-sinαPdSP-1ρSPcosαPdαPdSPA=1SPA[-(SAsinαA-SPsinαP)sinαP+SPcos2αP-SAcosαPcosαAcosβ]dSP+[(SAsinαA-SPsinαP)sinαA+SAcos2αA-SPcosαPcosαAcosβ]dSA+1ρ[-(SAsinαA-SPsinαP)SPcosαP-SP2cosαPsinαP+SPSAsinαPcosαAcosβ]dαP+1ρ[(SAsinαA-SPsinαP)SAcosαA-SA2

Accuracy of crown settlement in tunnel

In consideration of total station features, we assumed that the measuring accuracy of length ms were all equal, namely mSP=mSA=mS. This assumption held as well for the angle accuracy mα, namely mαP=mαA=mα. Then, the Eq. (6) is transformed as follows:mhPA=±sin2αA+sin2αPmS2+1ρ2DA2+DP2mα2=±kS2mS2+kα2mα2where kS=sin2αP+sin2αA, kα=1ρDA2+DP2, and mhPA is the mean error of height difference measured by the RDM with total station. ms and mα are the mean square errors of ranging measurement and angle

Conclusions

In this study, the accuracy of tunnel displacements as measured by RDM with total station was calculated and analyzed in accordance with error propagation law. Moreover, the optimal parameters of measuring points and total station locations were quantified, based on the actual situation of displacement measurement in highway tunnel construction. These parameters were integrated with different tunnels with various spans. The obtained optimal parameters of measuring points and total station

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51078040, 51278063, 51408054, and 51108034), the Ph. D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education (Grant No. 13-14 K) in China, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 2013G1281075, 2013G2211001, and 310821153106) in China, and the Science and Technology Co-ordinating Innovative Engineering Project of Shannxi Province (Grant No. 2014KTCG01-02) in China.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (68)

  • Surveying techniques for urban areas

    2023, Earth Observation in Urban Monitoring: Techniques and Challenges
  • An improved total station measurement method for the georeferenced orientation of self-propelled artillery barrel

    2022, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, the error of the total station measurement had a great influence on the calculation of the barrel orientation of the self-propelled artillery barrel. The measurement errors mainly come from the angle measurement of the total station itself, ranging errors, errors caused by the levelling of the total station, operator observation errors, and errors introduced by the azimuth reference angle [19]. In addition, since the orientation of the self-propelled artillery barrel was a function of the measurement angle of the total station [20], different measurement angles would have an impact on the orientation solution, so the total station deployment scheme was also one of the sources of errors.

  • Quantitative analysis method for measuring dead zone of non-orthogonal shafting structure

    2022, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text