Pt–Ni/C catalysts using different carbon supports for the cathode of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.08.007Get rights and content

Abstract

20 wt.% PtNi/C catalysts were prepared using a chemical reduction method, with Vulcan XC-72 conducting furnace black and graphene as the carbon support, respectively, and compared to commercial BASF 20 wt.% Pt/C (using Vulcan XC-72 carbon as support). The materials were characterized by X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The electrochemical performance of the PtNi/C catalysts was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry, and by steady-state measurements. Electrochemical measurements indicate that the PtNi nanocatalysts exhibited improved activity in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on graphene compared with those on Vulcan XC-72 carbon, and graphene could potentially provide much higher durability than XC-72. This suggests that graphene is a more effective catalyst support than Vulcan XC-72 carbon.

Highlights

► PtNi/C catalysts were prepared on C = Vulcan XC-72 carbon black and graphene. ► The PtNi/C exhibited enhanced catalytic activity compared to Pt/XC-72. ► The performance of PtNi/Graphene is higher than that of PtNi/XC-72. ► Graphene could potentially provide much higher durability than XC-72.

Introduction

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a class of devices used for the conversion of chemical energy into electrical energy [1]. Hydrogen-fed fuel cells are attractive power sources for both stationary and electric vehicle applications due to their high conversion efficiencies and zero CO2 emission. In particular, PEMFCs are the most promising candidates for transportation applications due to their low operating temperature (<100 °C) and rapid start-up time [2], [3], [4], [5]. However, the commercial viability of PEMFCs requires the development of better electrocatalysts to improve fuel cell performance. One of the key factors affecting the PEMFC's performance is a significant overpotential loss on the cathode side due to the slow oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics under typical conditions operation [6].

In the state-of-the-art PEMFC, platinum on carbon (usually Vulcan XC-72 conducting furnace black, Cabot Corporation, Boston, MA) is widely used as an electrocatalyst due to its excellent reaction kinetics at low temperature [7]. However, in order to further reduce cathode voltage losses, it is necessary to develop ORR electrocatalysts that are more catalytically active than platinum, which is expensive, and is in limited global supply. One approach is to synthesize platinum-based binary or ternary electrocatalysts. Several Pt-based binary systems, such as Pt–Fe [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], Pt–Ni [13], [14], [15], [16], and Pt–Co [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], with different Pt:M (M is a transition metal) atomic compositions have been investigated and have shown enhanced electrocatalytic activity towards ORR compared to Pt catalyst alone. Moreover, the presence of an alloy element reduces the costs associated with Pt.

Carbon materials usually have a high surface area to disperse metal grains, and their high conductivity transfers electrons generated from electrochemical reactions taking place on the anode. Therefore, the metal particles are often supported on carbon black (such as Vulcan XC-72) or other carbons with a high surface area. Recently, graphene, a single layer of carbon (carbon atoms in a two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice) has attracted strong scientific and technological interest [22] with great application potentials in various fields, such as electronic devices [23], nanocomposites [24], batteries [25], and fuel cells [26], [27], [28]. It has been proposed that carbon materials with a higher graphite component could be more stable [29].

In this study, we have investigated Pt–Ni/C catalysts, with Vulcan XC-72 and graphene (synthesized by the method reported in [30]) as carbon supports. We found that the Pt–Ni nanocatalysts exhibited enhanced activity in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on graphene compared with Vulcan XC-72.

Section snippets

Materials preparation

All chemicals were American Chemical Society standard (ACS) reagents and purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. The deposition of PtNi on graphene was carried out by a chemical method similar to that reported [31]. Typically, the mixture of NiCl2·6H2O and H2PtCl6·6H2O was dissolved in de-ionized water with the Pt:Ni (atomic ratio) = 1:1. Then appropriate amount of activated carbon Vulcan XC-72 or graphene (PtNi:C[weight ratio] = 20:80) was added in the solution and dispersed by the ultrasonic probe for

Results and discussion

The XRD patterns of XC-72 carbon and graphene are shown in Fig. 1(a). For XC-72 carbon, a rather wide and shallow (002) peak is observed in its XRD pattern, implying that XC-72 is an amorphous carbon material with small regions of crystallinity. A sharper and narrower carbon (002) diffraction peak appears for graphene, which indicates its highly graphitic ordered structure. The graphitic structure of carbon can be quantitatively characterized by the graphitization index, which indicates the

Conclusions

In summary, 20 wt.% PtNi/C catalysts were prepared using a simple chemical reduction method, with XC-72 and graphene, respectively, used as the carbon source, and compared to BASF 20 wt.% Pt/XC-72. The electrochemical performance of PtNi/Graphene and PtNi/XC-72 exhibited much enhanced catalytic activity towards ORR compared to Pt/XC-72, because of their unique electrical properties. Furthermore, the performance of PtNi/Graphene is higher than that of PtNi/XC-72 and graphene could potentially

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the Education Department of the Hubei province, “The development of non-enzymatic electrochemical biosensor based on Pt-M/C nanoparticles” (Q20120102).

References (37)

  • E. Negro et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2008)
  • A.K. Shukla et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (1995)
  • S. Vengatesan et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2008)
  • L. Xiong et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2002)
  • A.K. Shukla et al.

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (2004)
  • W. Li et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2004)
  • L. Xiong et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2005)
  • G. Samjeske et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2002)
  • M. Min et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2000)
  • J.R.C. Salgado et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2005)
  • Y.M. Li et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2009)
  • G.X. Wang et al.

    Carbon

    (2009)
  • H.M. Wu et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2009)
  • Y.Y. Shao et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2010)
  • S. Gottesfeld et al.

    Adv. Electrochem. Sci. Eng.

    (1997)
  • D.H. Jung et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (1998)
  • W. Vielstich et al.

    Handbook of Fuel Cells

    (2003)
  • H.A. Gasteiger et al.
  • Cited by (19)

    • Microwave assisted, facile synthesis of Pt/CNT catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cell application

      2017, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pt catalysts with smaller particle size and good dispersion throughout their support are reported to exhibit enhanced catalytic activity [13–16]. Pt catalysts for fuel cell are commonly prepared via chemical reduction route using either NaBH4 [17–20] or ethylene glycol (EG) [21–24] as the reducing agent. NaBH4 is a strong reducing agent that can perform fast even at room temperature; but, often it does not provide adequate control on the particle size and dispersion of the synthesized metal particles.

    • Influence of various carbon nano-forms as supports for Pt catalyst on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance

      2017, Journal of Power Sources
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gamez et al. investigated PtPd catalysts supported on Vulcan XC-72R (a form of CB) and on HSAG 300 Lonza (higher surface area graphite) and found that the catalyst supported on Vulcan presented higher active surface area than the other one [25]. Conversely, in the works of Wu et al., PtNi catalyst supported on graphene exhibited improved ORR activity than Vulcan-XC-72 [26]. These studies bring out the significance of carbon as support materials for Pt catalyst in fuel cell and also necessitate the comparison under identical conditions of major classes of carbon supports, viz. CB, SWCNT, MWCNT and graphene which are reported to increase the fuel cell performance.

    • Synthesis, characterization and magnetic properties of highly monodispersed PtNi nanoparticles

      2015, Materials Chemistry and Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Magnetic platinum–nickel (PtNi) alloy nanoparticles have widely potential applications in high density data storage [1], catalysts used in fuel cells [2,3], and different sensors [4,5]. For example, PtNi nanoparticles are frequently used in direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) as anode catalysts for methanol oxidation [6,7], and as cathode catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction [8,9]. These catalytic properties are highly dependent on the size, shape and composition of the nanoparticles.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text