Elsevier

Journal of Voice

Volume 27, Issue 2, March 2013, Pages 177-186
Journal of Voice

An Examination of Surface EMG for the Assessment of Muscle Tension Dysphonia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.06.006Get rights and content

Summary

Objectives

Muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is the pathological condition in which an excessive tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature leads to a disturbed voice. Surface electromyography (sEMG) was used to investigate differences in extralaryngeal muscles’ tension in patients with MTD compared with normal speakers. sEMG was examined as a diagnostic tool to differentiate between patients with MTD and controls.

Methods

Eighteen patients with MTD and 44 normal speakers were included in the study. All subjects were evaluated with videostroboscopy, voice assessment protocol, and sEMG. sEMG was performed on three locations of the anterior neck. Measurements were taken during silence, phonation tasks, and while reading, with comparisons made between both study groups.

Results

Patients with MTD did not express higher levels of sEMG during rest, phonation, or reading compared with normal speakers. There were no significant differences in sEMG values between males and females in both study groups.

Conclusion

sEMG was not able to detect an increase in muscle tension in patients with MTD. The results of this study do not support the use of sEMG as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing patients with and without MTD. Clinical examination with laryngeal palpation, videostroboscopy, and dysphonia severity index remain the key investigations.

Introduction

Muscle Tension Dysphonia (MTD) is one of the most prevalent diagnoses in patients frequenting the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) department for voice disorders.1, 2, 3 MTD is the pathological condition in which an excessive tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature, caused by a diverse number of etiological factors, leads to a disturbed voice.4, 5, 6 Several causes such as (1) technical misuses of the vocal mechanism in the context of extraordinary voice demands, (2) learned adaptations after upper respiratory tract infections, (3) laryngopharyngeal reflux, and (4) certain psychological and/or personality traits, have been cited as contributing factors to the imbalanced muscle activity.7 However, the underlying etiology of the increased muscular tension of the extralaryngeal muscles in patients with MTD is still poorly understood. It has been hypothesized that the altered tension of the extrinsic musculature in patients with MTD results in a changed position of the larynx in the neck. Because of this altered position, the inclination of the cartilaginous structures of the larynx (hyoid, thyroid, cricoid, and arytenoid) is disturbed, which affects the intrinsic musculature.8 Tension of the vocal folds is altered and the voice becomes disturbed.

MTD can be divided into two categories. Primary MTD involves a dysphonia in the absence of concurrent organic vocal fold pathology and is associated with excessive, atypical, or abnormal laryngeal movements during phonation, without obvious psychogenic or neurologic etiology.9 Primary MTD occurs primarily in women and accounts for 10–40% of the clinical caseloads at a voice center.7, 10, 11 Secondary MTD indicates a dysphonia in the presence of an underlying organic condition.9 This study focuses on primary MTD.

A few studies have shown that there is a measurable difference in the tension (eg, an increased tension) of the (para)laryngeal musculature between patients with MTD and healthy subjects.12, 13 These studies used surface electromyography (sEMG), to measure the tension of the supra- and infrahyoidal muscles. Electromyographic investigation enables recording of the collective behavior of motor units lying under the surface electrode. Hočevar-Boltežar et al12 evaluated 11 patients with MTD and five normal speakers. Their results showed a 6- to 8-fold increase of EMG activity and an alternation of the EMG activity in the perioral and supralaryngeal muscles before and during phonation in most patients with MTD in comparison with normal speakers. Redenbaugh and Reich13 examined seven normal and seven vocally hyperfunctional speakers with surface EMG and concluded that the hyperfunctional speakers showed significantly higher EMG values than the normal speakers during rest, vowel phonation, and reading.

The use of sEMG in a population of patients with vocal hyperfunction (e.g. MTD and vocal nodules) has also been investigated by Stepp and colleagues.14, 15, 16 Stepp et al14 investigated the possible role of vocal hyperfunction in 10 singers with vocal fold nodules, 8 nonsingers with nodules and 10 normal speakers using anterior neck sEMG. Surface EMG during vocal tasks did not differentiate singers or nonsingers with vocal fold nodules from healthy controls. Stepp and colleagues15 also investigated if sEMG of the anterior neck is sensitive to changes in vocal hyperfunction associated with injection laryngoplasty. Thirteen patients were examined with sEMG before and after injection laryngoplasty for glottal phonatory insufficiency. Anterior neck sEMG was not significantly reduced despite significantly reduced perceptual ratings of strain and false vocal fold compression, reflecting a decrease of vocal hyperfunction. Furthermore, Stepp et al16 examined 16 participants with vocal hyperfunction (MTD and vocal nodules) with surface EMG and current neck tension rating systems before and after a single session of voice therapy. They concluded that correlations between palpation ratings and anterior neck sEMG were generally low.

This study was undertaken because currently there is no objective tool to evaluate patients with MTD. Surface EMG has not found its way into daily practice despite the positive results of previous research, therefore, this technique was evaluated, to establish if sEMG could function as an objective diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of MTD. To date, videostroboscopy is the main technique of investigation, but this does not always allow one to differentiate between patients with and without MTD because the laryngoscopic features of MTD (such as a incomplete posterior glottic closure) may also be present in normal speakers.11 Furthermore, interrater reliability from videostroboscopy is known to be average to poor.17 The use of sEMG to monitor changes in neck tension and/or laryngeal position in patients with MTD could lead to more standardized diagnosis and improved information about patient progress. The purpose of this study was to compare the tension of the (para)laryngeal musculature between MTD patients and normal speakers using surface EMG to evaluate the use of sEMG as a diagnostic tool in distinguishing patients with MTD from normal subjects. However, one has to keep in mind that surface EMG only reflects the tensions of the extrinsic laryngeal muscles, and no conclusions can be made regarding the effect on the intrinsic laryngeal muscles.

Section snippets

Participants

The patients with MTD were recruited at the ENT Department of the University Hospital in Ghent, Belgium. Eighteen patients with MTD (six men and 12 women, mean age 38.2 years, age range 22–57 years) participated in the study. All patients included in this study were newly diagnosed patients with primary MTD. None of the patients were involved in any (medical or behavioral) treatment aimed at treating MTD.

Diagnosis of MTD was based on following key features: (1) a history of vocal misuse/abuse

Characteristics of the MTD patients and normal speakers

The results reported are based on 18 patients with MTD and 44 normal speakers. The control population consisted of 13 men and 31 women; they ranged in age from 20 to 63 years (mean = 35.7, SD = 13.8). The MTD patients consisted of 12 women and six men; they ranged in age from 22 to 57 years (mean = 38.2, SD = 9.1). There were no significant differences regarding age (P = 0.209) or BMI (P = 0.185) between the patients with MTD and the control group. Women and men are equally distributed in both groups.

Discussion

This study compared relative sEMG levels of three sites of the (para)laryngeal musculature in 18 patients with MTD with a control group of 44 normal speakers. Each subject’s rest, vowel, and speech sEMG levels were normalized by using the absolute levels to derive proportions of his/her maximal EMG. Aerodynamic and acoustic measurements, DSI, VHI, and videostroboscopy were obtained, to distinguish between patients with MTD and normal speakers. An increased muscle tension of the laryngeal

Conclusion

The present study evaluated sEMG characteristics of patients with MTD in comparison with normal speakers, at three different sites of the anterior neck during silence, phonation, and reading tasks. This study did not show any differences in muscle tension, using sEMG between patients with MTD and the control group. Although sEMG is noninvasive and inexpensive, the results of this study do not support its use as a diagnostic tool for distinguishing patients with and without MTD. MTD remains

References (46)

  • B.L. Herrington-Hall et al.

    Description of laryngeal pathologies by age, sex, and occupation in a treatment-seeking sample

    J Speech Hear Disord

    (1988)
  • E. Van Houtte et al.

    The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking population with dysphonia

    Laryngoscope

    (2009)
  • M.D. Morrison et al.

    Diagnostic criteria in functional dysphonia

    Laryngoscope

    (1986)
  • J.A. Koufman et al.

    Classification and approach to patients with functional voice disorders

    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol

    (1982)
  • J.C. Stemple et al.

    Electromyographic biofeedback training with patients exhibiting a hyperfunctional voice disorder

    Laryngoscope

    (1980)
  • N. Roy

    Functional dysphonia

    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2003)
  • K. Verdolini et al.

    Classification Manual for Voice Disorder-I

    (2006)
  • M.W. Bridger et al.

    Functional voice disorders. A review of 109 patients

    J Laryngol Otol

    (1983)
  • A. Sama et al.

    The clinical features of functional dysphonia

    Laryngoscope

    (2001)
  • I. Hočevar-Boltežar et al.

    Role of surface EMG in diagnostics and treatment of muscle tension dysphonia

    Acta Otolaryngol

    (1998)
  • M.A. Redenbaugh et al.

    Surface EMG and related measures in normal and vocally hyperfunctional speakers

    J Speech Hear Disord

    (1989)
  • Stepp CE, Heaton JT, Stadelman-Cohen TK, Braden MN, Jette ME, Hillman RE. Characteristics of phonatory function in...
  • C.E. Stepp et al.

    Neck surface electromyography as a measure of vocal hyperfunction before and after injection laryngoplasty

    Ann Otolaryngol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Comparison of Laryngeal Palpatory Scale (LPS), With Surface Electromyographic Measures in Patients with Muscle Tension Dysphonia

      2024, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants were asked to sustain /a/ and /i/ vowels three times. They found that ICC for each phonation task was >0.90.25 Reported RMS reliability of the examined muscles is consistent with the findings of the current study.

    • Exploring the Characteristics of Functional Dysphonia by Multimodal Methods

      2023, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      The vowel sounds /i/ and /a/ were selected for the phonation task, using various pitches and loudness levels; the short phrase "I am going to Heilongjiang, he is going to Wuxi City" (in Mandarin) , and the short text " North Wind and Sun" (in Mandarin) were used, with 10 seconds rest following each period of phonation to avoid fatigue. The vowels were spoken 3 times, and the best signal was used.16 Recordings were monitored in real-time for signal integrity and any movement artifact.

    • Electromyographic Assessment of the External Laryngeal Muscles of Opera Singers During Phonation and Non-Phonation Tasks

      2022, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the work of von Houtte, SEMG was not able to detect an increase in muscle tension in patients with muscle tension dysphonia. In the article, however, the author noted that EMG certainly provides additional valuable information2. Treating EMG as a valuable ancillary test, not a differential or conclusive test, is a widely accepted view in the scientific community.18,19

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text