Review
Clogging in permeable concrete: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Permeable concrete exhibits a reduction in permeability over time due to clogging.

  • Effectiveness of remediation techniques is limited for particles within the microstructure.

  • Potential for clogging is related to tortuosity of connected porosity.

  • Permeable concrete with significantly reduced pore tortuosity is required.

Abstract

Permeable concrete (or “pervious concrete” in North America) is used to reduce local flooding in urban areas and is an important sustainable urban drainage system. However, permeable concrete exhibits reduction in permeability due to clogging by particulates, which severely limits service life. This paper reviews the clogging mechanism and current mitigating strategies in order to inform future research needs. The pore structure of permeable concrete and characteristics of flowing particulates influence clogging, which occurs when particles build-up and block connected porosity. Permeable concrete requires regular maintenance by vacuum sweeping and pressure washing, but the effectiveness and viability of these methods is questionable. The potential for clogging is related to the tortuosity of the connected porosity, with greater tortuosity resulting in increased potential for clogging. Research is required to develop permeable concrete that can be poured on-site, which produces a pore structure with significantly reduced tortuosity.

Introduction

Urban areas are associated with hard impervious infrastructure that increases surface water run-off during heavy rain and the potential for localised flash flooding. Permeable concrete shown in Fig. 1, is widely-regarded as an important cost effective sustainable urban drainage system that can reduce storm-water run-off to alleviate the problem of localised urban flooding (EPA, 2004). It is made by omitting most or all of the fine aggregate from normal concrete and by careful control of the cement paste fraction. This produces a highly porous material with typically 15–35% volume of interconnected voids that allow very rapid water percolation.

A typical permeable pavement system consists of a top permeable concrete layer placed above a sub-base coarse aggregate layer and subgrade soil (Fig. 2). In practice, there are many variations in the number, thickness and composition of each layer, but all with the purpose of storing stormwater runoff until it infiltrates into the existing soil or is drained. Permeable pavement systems can be designed for full, partial or zero exfiltration depending on site soil conditions. Partial and zero exfiltration systems contain sub-drains or an impermeable liner to prevent water reaching the underlying soil. These systems are best suited for sites with poorly draining soils, contaminated soils or in groundwater sensitive areas (Drake et al., 2013, Crookes, 2015).

Permeable concrete is primarily used in car parks, pedestrian footpaths, cycle paths and other low-traffic areas. The hydrologic benefits of permeable pavements for reducing run-off volume and peak flow rates are well-documented (Abbott and Comino-Mateos, 2003). For example, annual run-off volume reductions of 50–100% have been observed (Stenmark, 1995, Legret and Colandini, 1999, Dempsey and Swisher, 2003). Even if the underlying soil is poor draining, permeable pavement systems can reduce peak flows by over 90% and surface run-off volumes by 43% (Drake et al., 2014). As such, permeable concrete pavements are well suited to existing urban areas that lack conventional storm-water management facilities. In new urban areas, they can decrease development costs by limiting the need for other storm-water management infrastructure (ACI, 2010, Ferguson, 2005, Tennis et al., 2004).

It has also been reported that permeable concrete captures suspended solids, P, N, Zn, Cu and motor oil, improving stormwater and groundwater quality (Schueler, 1987, Brattebo and Booth, 2003, Scholz and Grabowiecki, 2007, Calkins et al., 2010, Welker et al., 2013, Sansalone et al., 2008). It is also reported to improve skid resistance and minimise heat island effects in cities (Tennis et al., 2004, Amde and Rogge, 2013, Schaefer et al., 2006). However, the latter is probably due to a change in pavement colour (black asphalt to grey concrete), rather than the high permeability of permeable concrete.

While permeable concrete clearly has many benefits, it is inevitably susceptible to clogging that leads to serviceability problems and premature degradation (Deo et al., 2010, Yong et al., 2013, Mata and Leming, 2012, Coughlin et al., 2012, Tong, 2011). Physical clogging is caused by debris build-up on the surface and in the pore structure; this is likely to be the most common mechanism. Biological clogging caused by algae and bacteria, and penetration of plant roots can also occur (Ye et al., 2010, Mishra et al., 2013). Addressing this problem will substantially improve the durability of permeable concrete and optimize its application as a sustainable urban drainage system. Yet, this is not well-understood and limited information is available on factors influencing clogging (Tong, 2011, Mishra et al., 2013, Radlinska et al., 2012).

The objective of this paper is to critically review available studies on clogging, summarise current understanding of the problem and mitigating strategies. We aim to identify knowledge gaps and highlight research needs. A major challenge is that such research requires a range of expertise including cement and concrete materials science, pavement design, mass transport phenomena, structural, environmental and water resources engineering. Also, the amount of related studies has increased significantly in recent years. Therefore, a review that summarizes work from across these expertise is much needed. The structure of this paper is as follows. Properties of permeable concrete and factors influencing performance are first reviewed. Then, research related to understanding clogging and methods to unclog permeable concrete are addressed. Finally, future research needs are discussed.

Section snippets

Composition and mix design

Materials used in permeable concrete are the same as in normal concrete, but the mix proportioning is different. The aim in permeable concrete mix design is to achieve a balance between voids, strength, paste content and workability. Fine aggregate content is significantly reduced (Tennis et al., 2004, Obla, 2007). Various mix proportioning methods have been recommended, and the most important requirement is to provide sufficient cement paste to bind aggregates to achieve the required strength

Cement content and water/cement (w/c) ratio

High compressive strength is achieved by increasing cement content, but excessive cement results in filled voids and reduced porosity. Conversely, insufficient cement results in poor aggregate coating and low compressive strength. The optimum cement content is dependent on aggregate size distribution (ACI, 2010). The optimum w/c ratio is typically between 0.26 and 0.45. Ghafoori and Dutta (1995) determined that the optimum w/c ratio was 0.37–0.42 for an aggregate/cement (a/c) ratio of 4–6.

Clogging mechanism

Permeable pavements will clog over time as solid particles are retained and accumulate. Percolating stormwater carries with it a range of solids and the problem is exacerbated by traffic that breaks these down into finer particles. The particles fill and block void spaces, allowing further accumulation of fines. On drying, the accumulated particles form a hard crust that seals the voids (Pratt et al., 1995). These processes reduce infiltration rates, eventually causing surface overflow and

Field investigations

Field measurements have observed huge variation in the properties of permeable concrete. For example, Kayhanian et al. (2012) measured the permeability of 20 permeable concrete pavements in car parks in California, with ages ranging from 1 to 8 years. Measurements were taken at the main entrance, an area with no traffic, and three measurements within a parking space at each car park. The permeabilities measured ranged from 0.0002 to 1.82 cm/s. Large variability was observed within each and

Methods to unclog permeable concrete

Permeable concrete pavements require regular maintenance to preserve performance and effectiveness. The main focus of maintenance is removing particles causing clogging to recover infiltration capacity. Pressure/power washing with water and vacuum sweeping (or a combination of these) are the most recommended methods to rehabilitate clogged permeable concrete (EPA, 2004, Golroo and Tighe, 2012, Drake et al., 2013). Pressure washing uses a power head cone nozzle to weaken the bond between

Innovations and future research

This review has identified several unresolved issues concerning the performance of permeable concrete that need further investigation in order to optimize application. Despite significant recent advances in this area, a better understanding of how mix constituents and proportioning, and construction techniques (placement, compaction, curing) influence the properties of permeable concrete is still very much needed. Poor understanding of these fundamental issues contributes to the recurring

Conclusions

Permeable concrete is characterised by highly interconnected porosity, typically in the range of 15–35% vol. that allows water to flow rapidly through the pore structure. A critical problem with permeable concrete is clogging due to surface blocking and infiltration of fine particles which causes loss of permeability and performance degradation. Clogging is related to the high pore tortuosity formed in current permeable concrete formulations. As a result, permeable concrete requires frequent

Acknowledgements

AK is funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (Grant no. EP/L016826/1) through the Centre for Doctoral Training (CDT) in Sustainable Civil Engineering at Imperial College London.

References (83)

  • M. Sonebi et al.

    Investigating the effect of mixture design parameters on pervious concrete by statistical modelling

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • C. Stenmark

    An alternative road construction for stormwater management in cold climates

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1995)
  • M.S. Sumanasooriya et al.

    Pore structure features of pervious concretes proportioned for desired porosities and their performance prediction

    Cem. Concr. Compos

    (2011)
  • A. Yahia et al.

    New approach to proportion pervious concrete

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2014)
  • C.F. Yong et al.

    Predicting physical clogging of porous and permeable pavements

    J. Hydrol.

    (2013)
  • C.L. Abbott et al.

    In-situ hydraulic performance of a permeable pavement sustainable urban drainage system

    Water Environ. J.

    (2003)
  • A.M. Amde et al.

    Development of High Quality Pervious Concrete Specifications for Maryland Conditions

    (2013)
  • American Concrete Institute (ACI)

    Report on Pervious Concrete. ACI Committee 522

    (2010)
  • J. Bear

    Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media

    (1988)
  • F. Boogaard et al.

    Effect of age of permeable pavements on their infiltration function. Clean – soil, air

    Water

    (2014)
  • T. Boving et al.

    Potential for localized groundwater contamination in a porous pavement parking lot setting in Rhode Island

    Environ. Geol.

    (2008)
  • C. Brown et al.

    Characteristics of sediment removal in two types of permeable pavement

    Water Qual. Res. J. Can.

    (2009)
  • J. Calkins et al.

    Removal of heavy metals using pervious concrete material

  • M. Chopra et al.

    Construction and Maintenance Assessment of Pervious Concrete Pavements

    (2007)
  • M. Chopra et al.

    Effect of rejuvenation methods on the infiltration rates of pervious concrete pavements

    J. Hydrol. Eng.

    (2010)
  • J.P. Coughlin et al.

    Infiltration and clogging by sand and clay in a pervious concrete pavement system

    J. Hydrol. Eng.

    (2012)
  • CRMA

    Specifier's Guide for Pervious Concrete Pavement Design

    (2009)
  • A. Crookes

    Performance of Hydromedia Pervious Concrete Pavement Subjected to Urban Traffic Loads in Ontario

    (2015)
  • L.K. Crouch et al.

    Determining pervious PCC permeability with a simple triaxial flexible-wall constant head permeameter

  • B.A. Dempsey et al.

    Evaluation of Porous Pavement and Infiltration in Centre County, PA

    (2003)
  • O. Deo et al.

    Permeability reduction in pervious concretes due to clogging: experiments and modeling

    J. Mater. Civ. Eng.

    (2010)
  • J.A.P. Drake et al.

    Assessing the potential for restoration of surface permeability for permeable pavements through maintenance

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • J.A.P. Drake et al.

    Review of environmental performance of permeable pavement systems: state of the knowledge

    Water Qual. Res. J. Can.

    (2013)
  • J.A.P. Drake et al.

    Hydrologic performance of three partial-infiltration permeable pavements in a cold climate over low permeability soil

    J. Hydrol. Eng.

    (2014)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    National Menu for Best Management Practices, Post-construction Stormwater Management

    (2004)
  • B.K. Ferguson

    Porous Pavements

    (2005)
  • N. Ghafoori et al.

    Laboratory investigation of compacted no-fines concrete for paving materials

    J. Mater. Civ. Eng.

    (1995)
  • A. Golroo et al.

    Pervious concrete pavement performance modeling: an empirical approach in cold climates

    Can. J. Civ. Eng.

    (2012)
  • J. Gunderson

    Pervious Pavements: New Findings about Their Functionality and Performance in Cold Climates. Stormwater Magazine

    (2008)
  • W.S. Guthrie et al.

    Effects of soil clogging and water saturation on freeze-thaw durability of pervious concrete

    J. Transp. Res. Board

    (2010)
  • A.S. Hager

    Sustainable Design of Pervious Concrete Pavements

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text