Elsevier

Journal of Critical Care

Volume 29, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 150-156
Journal of Critical Care

Clinical Potpourri
Selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The oxidative stress is recognized as a constant feature in critical illness. Nevertheless, the use of antioxidant therapy remains controversial. We tried to demonstrate that intravenous selenium supplementation could promote antioxidant status and help protect against infection and organ failure, improving outcome in critically ill patients.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the exogenous supplementation of selenium versus standard therapy without any adjuvant in critically ill adults.

Results

Nine RCTs met inclusion criteria. Selenium supplementation was associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality of borderline statistical significance (risk ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.71–0.99, P = .04). The analysis of pre-defined subgroups detected no significant effects regarding the supplementation with doses of selenium ≤ 500 μg/d, administration of a load dose with a bolus and duration of treatment. Only 2 studies analyzed 6-month mortality and could not show a difference. No effects could be demonstrated on hospital length of stay, pulmonary infections, or renal failure.

Conclusions

The use of high-dose selenium might be associated with a beneficial effect on 28-day mortality in critically ill patients. Nevertheless, the use of selenium as adjuvant therapy needs further evaluations.

Introduction

It is known that critical illness is typically characterized by oxidative stress, an alteration of the normal intracellular balance between the constant formation of oxidants, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species, and biological system's ability to detoxify the reactive intermediates or to repair the resulting damage [1], [2]. The increase of free radicals production, the inadequate response of the defense systems involved in the detoxification of the cell by ROS, or both of these conditions, can damage biologically relevant molecules, such as DNA, RNA, proteins, and unsaturated fatty acids of the cell membranes, which may ultimately lead to cell death [3], [4]. In critically ill patients, oxidative stress plays an important role in pathophysiological events leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which may be complicated and result in acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [5]. The antioxidant endogenous defense systems are extremely effective at counteracting ROS and the other reactive species. These antioxidants systems include both enzymatic proteins (such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase) and secondary antioxidants (or non-enzymatic) [6], [7].

Selenium is a trace mineral and it is essential to the function of glutathione peroxidase, since it is a structural component of the active site of this selenoenzyme [6]. Evidence suggests that in critically ill patients plasma selenium is significantly below the normal range; furthermore, it has been demonstrated that depletion of this micronutrient is associated with a worse clinical outcome: low selenium levels were associated with a greater number of infectious complications and a higher incidence of mortality [8].

Since it seems evident the theoretical rationale of the use of antioxidants, such as selenium, in the critically ill patient, in the last decades, several clinical trials attempted to demonstrate if selenium supplementation can determine some effective clinical benefit. Recently, Manzanares et al has published a comprehensive meta-analysis of the use of antioxidants in critically ill patients [9]. Selenium is universally recognized as one of the most promising antioxidants [10].

The aim of this study is to systematically review the efficacy of intravenous selenium supplementation as monotherapy in critically ill patients. Furthermore, we wished to assess the robustness of the conclusions by predicting the potential impact of a new study on the statistical significance and heterogeneity of our meta-analysis, which explores the need and potential impact of further research in this field.

Section snippets

Objectives

The primary aim of this review was to investigate the effect of intravenous selenium supplementation on 28-day mortality in critically ill patients.

The secondary objective was to evaluate the effects of selenium supplementation on other outcomes, such as mortality at 6 months, length of intensive care unit stay, number of nosocomial respiratory infections, incidence of renal failure and/or need for a renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Types of studies

We included all randomized (RCTs) and quasi-randomized

Description of studies

Our search results are detailed in Fig. 1.

Nineteen randomized controlled trials investigating intravenous selenium supplementation in critically ill patients were assessed for eligibility. Of these, we included 9 trials in our meta-analysis [12], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] and we described them herein (Table E1, available online).

We excluded the remaining 10 RCTs. The reasons for exclusion were a different kind of intervention, with administration of a cocktail containing

Discussion

Critically ill patients experience a severe state of oxidative stress, resulting in the dysfunction of the systems responsible for energy production in cells [1], [7]. This imbalance can cause damage to biologically relevant molecules and lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and SIRS with worsening of patient-related outcomes [4], [5].

In this context, supplemental selenium (in combination with standard therapy) could represent an important therapeutic option. Therefore, we performed a

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Tessa Piazzini MLS, for her assistance and electronic searches advice during the identification of trials for this work.

References (34)

  • K. Rahman

    Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors

    Clin Interv Aging

    (2007)
  • X. Forceville

    Seleno-enzymes and seleno-compounds: the two faces of selenium

    Crit Care

    (2006)
  • W. Manzanares et al.

    Antioxidant micronutrients in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Crit Care

    (2012)
  • D.K. Heyland et al.

    Antioxidant nutrients: a systematic review of trace elements and vitamins in the critically ill patient

    Intensive Care Med

    (2005)
  • W. Alhazzani et al.

    The effect of selenium therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Crit Care Med

    (2013)
  • C. Montoya et al.

    Efecto antiinflamatorio del selenio en pacientes septicos

    Rev Asoc Mex Med Crit y Ter Int

    (2009)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Daily parenteral selenium therapy in critically ill patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      2021, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
      Citation Excerpt :

      It may be because of various doses and types of Se, route of administration (enteral or parenteral), and duration of therapy. On the other hand, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of Se in doses lower or higher than 1000 μg per day and the duration lower or higher than 10 days, as mentioned at the ASPEN guidelines [7,8]. In addition, the previous meta-analysis resulted that Se supplementation has no effect on renal failure [9].

    • Effect of high-dose sodium selenite in cardiac surgery patients: A randomized controlled bi-center trial

      2018, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Improved survival due to selenium supplementation (without or in combination with other antioxidants) was also demonstrated in critically ill patients by hitherto five meta-analyses [see 20, 21]. However, other studies on selenium supplementation in these patients did not find such beneficial effects [19–25]. In contrast to sepsis, elective cardiac surgery can be considered as quite ideal model to investigate the effect of selenium supplementation on inflammatory responses in man insofar the study population typically consists of a large number of suitable patients often suffering from a single (i.e. cardiac) disease without preexisting inflammation that underwent a defined hit (i.e. cardiac surgery) being followed by inflammatory responses over a relative short period of time.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text