Research Paper
Orthognathic Surgery
A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.11.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used for maxillofacial imaging. 3D virtual planning of orthognathic and facial orthomorphic surgery requires detailed visualisation of the interocclusal relationship. This study aimed to introduce and evaluate the use of a double CBCT scan procedure with a modified wax bite wafer to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. The impressions of the dental arches and the wax bite wafer were scanned for ten patient separately using a high resolution standardized CBCT scanning protocol. Surface-based rigid registration using ICP (iterative closest points) was used to fit the virtual models on the wax bite wafer. Automatic rigid point-based registration of the wax bite wafer on the patient scan was performed to implement the digital virtual dental arches into the patient's skull model. Probability error histograms showed errors of ≤0.22 mm (25% percentile), ≤0.44 mm (50% percentile) and ≤1.09 mm (90% percentile) for ICP surface matching. The mean registration error for automatic point-based rigid registration was 0.18 ± 0.10 mm (range 0.13–0.26 mm). The results show the potential for a double CBCT scan procedure with a modified wax bite wafer to set-up a 3D virtual augmented model of the skull with detailed dental surface.

Section snippets

Material and methods

The combination of a double CBCT scan procedure with a modified wax bite wafer was evaluated on 10 patients who attended for a routine orthognathic surgical work-up in the Division of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, General Hospital St-Jan Bruges, Bruges.

For each patient, a modified wax bite wafer was prepared with Delar Bite-Registration wax (Delar Corp, Lake Oswego, USA) (Fig. 1). The horseshoe wax bite wafer with a posterior extension was shaped after heating the wax in a thermostatically controlled

Results

A total of 26,337 ± 3411 (range: 20,672–32,169) and 21,550 ± 3011 (range 17,304–27,315) Euclidean distances were calculated in mm to define the accuracy of ICP surface matching of the impressions of the virtual upper and lower dental arches on the modified wax bite wafer. Probability error histograms showed errors ≤0.16 mm (25% percentile), ≤0.34 mm (50% percentile) and ≤0.97 mm (90% percentile) for surface matching of the upper dental arches and ≤0.22 mm (25% percentile), ≤0.44 (50% percentile) and

Discussion

Inaccurate visualization of the interocclusal relationship owing to streak artefacts and limited resolution MSCT scanning remains the major drawback of 3D virtual planning of orthognathic surgery and facial orthomorphic surgery. Different procedures have been reported in the literature to integrate a precise dental model into 3D milled33, 38, 65, 76, stereolithographic62 and computerized17, 55 models of the skull. Gateno and coworkers17, 18, 19, 83, 84 were the first to report a clinical

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pieter De Groeve, Tinne Van Delm and Kevin Suetens (Medicim NV, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium; www.medicim.com) for their dedication and support. The authors also thank Jeff Koerber MD, LDS and Kristof Berquin MD, LDS for their help.

Source of support: This work was partially supported by the Flemish government by grant IWT-040310.

References (87)

  • A. Katsumata et al.

    Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    (2006)
  • M.O. Lagravere et al.

    Proposed reference point for 3Dimensional cephalometric analysis with cone-beam computerized tomography

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (2005)
  • M. Loubele et al.

    Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study

    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod

    (2006)
  • Y. Nakagawa et al.

    Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2002)
  • M.A. Rafferty et al.

    Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of temporal bone surgery

    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2006)
  • M. Rigolone et al.

    Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: “low-dose cone-beam” CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations

    J Endod

    (2003)
  • D. Schulze et al.

    Evaluation of quality of reformatted images from two cone-beam computed tomographic systems

    J Craniomaxillofac Surg

    (2005)
  • J.H. Simon et al.

    Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy

    J Endod

    (2006)
  • G.R.J. Swennen et al.

    Three-dimensional cephalometry. Spiral multi-slice versus cone-beam CT

    Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop

    (2006)
  • G.R.J. Swennen et al.

    The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2007)
  • H. Terai et al.

    Accuracy of integration of dental casts in three-dimensional models

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (1999)
  • K. Tsiklakis et al.

    Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT

    Eur J Radiol

    (2005)
  • L. Walker et al.

    Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography

    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop

    (2005)
  • J.J. Xia et al.

    Three-dimensional computer-aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery

    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am

    (2005)
  • J.J. Xia et al.

    Accuracy of a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) system in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities: A pilot study

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2007)
  • C. Zizelmann et al.

    Computer-assisted reconstruction of orbital floor based on cone beam tomography

    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2007)
  • C.A. Aboudara et al.

    A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescents

    Orthod Craniofac Res

    (2003)
  • B.G. Akdeniz et al.

    Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography

    Caries Res

    (2006)
  • D.M. Almog et al.

    Cone beam computerized tomography-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance. Part 1: Single implant in the mandibular molar region

    J Oral Implantol

    (2006)
  • Y. Arai et al.

    Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use

    Dentomaxillofac Radiol

    (1999)
  • K. Araki et al.

    Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties

    Dentomaxillofac Radiol

    (2004)
  • P. Aranyarachkul et al.

    Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

    (2005)
  • R. Baba et al.

    Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging

    Dentomaxillofac Radiol

    (2004)
  • S. Baumrind et al.

    Using three-dimensional imaging to assess treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a progress report from the University of the Pacific

    Orthod Craniofac Res

    (2003)
  • L.H. Cevidanes et al.

    Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients

    Dentomaxillofac Radiol

    (2005)
  • R.A. Danforth

    Cone beam volume tomography: a new digital imaging option for dentistry

    J Calif Dent Assoc

    (2003)
  • R.A. Danforth et al.

    3D volume imaging for dentistry: a new dimension

    J Calif Dent Assoc

    (2003)
  • R. Enciso et al.

    Three-dimensional visualization of the craniofacial patient: volume segmentation, data integration and animation

    Orthod Craniofac Res

    (2003)
  • T. Fortin et al.

    Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine

    Clin Oral Implants Res

    (2002)
  • S.D. Ganz

    Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning

    Dent Implantol Update

    (2005)
  • M.E. Guerrero et al.

    State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement

    Clin Oral Investig

    (2006)
  • Y. Hamada et al.

    Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: a preliminary report

    Cleft Palate Craniofac J

    (2005)
  • K. Hashimoto et al.

    Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT

    J Oral Sci

    (2006)
  • Cited by (105)

    • The online attention analysis on orthognathic surgery research

      2024, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    • Customization in minimally invasive orthognathic surgery

      2021, Advances in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text