A new approach for selection of Oenococcus oeni strains in order to produce malolactic starters

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.04.023Get rights and content

Abstract

The lactic acid bacterium Oenococcus oeni, mainly responsible for malolactic fermentation (MLF), is used in new winery process as starter culture for direct inoculation. The difficulty to master MLF according to the wine led us to search a new approach to select effective O. oeni strains. Biochemical and molecular tests were performed in order to characterize three strains of O. oeni selected for malolactic starter elaboration. Malolactic and ATPase activities that appeared as a great interest in MLF were measured and the expression of a small heat shock protein Lo18 was evaluated by immunoblotting and real-time PCR. These results were correlated with the performances of strains in two red wines. Physiological and molecular characteristics of the three strains showed significant differences for the global malolactic activity on intact cell at pH 3.0 and at the level of induction of the small heat shock protein Lo18. These two parameters appeared of interest to evaluate in the ability of O. oeni strains to survive into wine after direct inoculation and to perform MLF. Indeed, a tested strain that presented the highest malolactic activity on intact cells at pH 3.0 and a high level of Lo18 induction showed a high growth rate and a high specific kinetic of malate consumption. The techniques used in this work carry out more quickly and more reliable than usual for the selection of effective strains intended for direct inoculation in wines.

Introduction

Processes involved in the elaboration of wines are complex and most of the time require two successive fermentations: firstly alcoholic fermentation carried out by yeasts, and secondly malolactic fermentation (MLF) by lactic acid bacteria, especially Oenococcus oeni. This second phase involves deacidification by bioconversion of l-malic acid into l-lactic acid and carbon dioxide. MLF also improves the microbiological stability and the organoleptic characteristics of wines (Kunkee, 1991).

Even though MLF occurs spontaneously in wines, it starts randomly, and any delay in the starting of MLF can lead to an alteration of wine quality (Henick-Kling, 1995). Moreover, in wines with low pH, MLF remains unreliable. Therefore, recent winery practices consist in using malolactic starters for direct inoculation in wines (Nielsen et al., 1996, Maicas, 2001). However, induction of MLF by inoculation with commercially available strains of O. oeni is not always successful. The difficulty in inducing MLF in wine remains problematic because wine is a very harsh environment for bacterial growth. Nowadays, selection of strains for wine inoculation is performed by classic tests based essentially on the survival in wine and monitoring the consumption of l-malic acid (Henick-Kling et al., 1989). Knowledge of O. oeni physiology in stress conditions can be used to generate tools based on molecular and physiological approaches allowing more precise characterization of strains. Among the metabolic and enzymatic systems that could be used to this end, l-malic acid metabolism and ATPase activity are of great interest. Indeed, l-malic acid metabolism and ATPase activity together contribute to the acidophilic behaviour of O. oeni (Tourdot-Marechal et al., 1999). Both mechanisms participate in the intracellular pH (pHi) homeostasis of cells. ATPase bound to the plasma membrane extrudes protons from the cell (Koebmann et al., 2000). The role of ATPase in resistance to acid conditions was clearly demonstrated by studying ATPase deficient mutants of O. oeni (Tourdot-Marechal et al., 1999). During MLF, metabolic energy is conserved as a chemiosmotic coupling mechanism in combination with H+ consumption in the cytoplasm (Cox and Henick-Kling, 1989, Salema et al., 1996). On the other hand, when cells are under different stresses, stress proteins are synthesized. Based on the stress-specific high expression of Lo18 (Guzzo et al., 1997), this small heat shock protein (smHsp) was identified as a good marker of stress for O. oeni. No signal of Lo18 is detected in the logarithmic growth phase in normal growth conditions. The study of this protein showed that Lo18 possesses a chaperon activity in vitro and is located in part in the membrane fraction (Delmas et al., 2001).

The aim of this study is to use biochemical and molecular tests to compare three strains of O. oeni selected for the elaboration of malolactic starters. The results of these tests correlated with the performances of the strains in wines.

Section snippets

Bacteria strains and rehydration conditions

Three freeze-dried strains (A, B and C) of O. oeni were obtained from the collection of the laboratory of Lallemand SA (Toulouse, France) and cultivated on Lallemand medium. For the biochemical and molecular characterization, two independently freeze-dried batches were tested to confirm reproducibility of batch production for each strain. The strains were collected in stationary growth phase.

Before using them, these strains were rehydrated with water containing 1 g L 1 peptone, 0.9 g L 1 NaCl

Biochemical and molecular characterization of O. oeni strains

The intracellular malolactic activity of the three strains is presented in Fig. 1A. The specific malolactic activity of strain C was the greatest with a value of 570 μmol malate h 1 mg 1 protein. Strains A and B showed lower specific malolactic activity, respectively 59% and 40%, compared to that of the strain C. Taking into account the observed standard deviation, the activity of the three strains was quite similar. In the cell, l-malic acid is decarboxylated into l-lactic acid and CO2 by the

Discussion

MLF and ATPase play a central role in the acidophilic behaviour of O. oeni and recently a link between the two enzymatic systems has been demonstrated (Galland et al., 2003). Comparison of the intracellular malolactic activities of strains A, B and C has revealed no significant difference. The same conclusion can be deduced from the results obtained from the comparison of ATPase activities. Consequently, it is difficult to distinguish between these strains by analysing the intracellular

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ministère de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement (France), by the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne (France) and by Lallemand SA (Toulouse, France).

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (65)

  • Molecular adaptation response of Oenococcus oeni in non-Saccharomyces fermented wines: A comparative multi-omics approach

    2022, International Journal of Food Microbiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Also known as Lo18 or Hsp18, Hsp20 has long been described as one of the main stress-responding proteins in O. oeni with chaperone and membrane protection functions (Coucheney et al., 2005b; Guzzo et al., 1997). Indeed, it has also been proposed as a stress response marker of interest to predict MLF performances (Coucheney et al., 2005a; Olguín et al., 2010). Some DEGs relating to tRNAs were detected in the samples (Fig. 6).

  • Malolactic fermentation and its effects on wine quality and safety

    2021, Managing Wine Quality: Volume 2: Oenology and Wine Quality
  • Exopolysaccharides produced by Oenococcus oeni: From genomic and phenotypic analysis to technological valorization

    2016, Food Microbiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    According to the recommendation of the manufacturer, they can be added to wine during or at the end of the alcoholic fermentation (Rosi et al., 2003). The commercialized O. oeni malolactic starters are currently selected for their resistance to wine which displays low pH and contains alcohol and grape polyphenols (Coucheney et al., 2005), but their ability to produce exopolysaccharides (EPS) is so far not considered. However, this property could be crucial not only for the influence of polysaccharides on the organoleptic properties of wine (sweetness, palatability), but also for the protection of the bacteria during starter production and use (Crow and Crowe, 1986; Carpenter et al., 1990).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text