Optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC for enhancing power system security based on Differential Evolution algorithm

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.06.023Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach based on Differential Evolution (DE) technique to find out the optimal placement and parameter setting of Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) for enhancing power system security under single line contingencies. Firstly, we perform a contingency analysis and ranking process to determine the most severe line outage contingencies considering line overloads and bus voltage limit violations as a Performance Index. Secondly, we apply DE technique to find out the optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC under the determined contingency scenarios. To verify our proposed approach, we perform simulations on an IEEE 14-bus and an IEEE 30-bus power systems. The results we have obtained indicate that installing UPFC in the location optimized by DE can significantly enhance the security of power system by eliminating or minimizing the overloaded lines and the bus voltage limit violations.

Introduction

The secure operation of power system has become an important and critical issue in today’s large, complex, and load-increasing systems. Security constraints such as thermal limits of transmission lines and bus voltage limits must be satisfied under all system operation conditions. Commonly, power systems are planned and operated based on the N  1 security criterion, which implies that the system should remain secure under all important first contingencies. One solution to cope with this problem is to design the system to meet the N  1 security criterion which is somewhat conservative and costly. An alternative solution to improve the security of power system is the Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS) devices which is a concept proposed by Hingorani [1].

FACTS devices can reduce the flows of heavily loaded lines, maintain the bus voltages at desired levels, and improve the stability of the power network. Consequently, they can improve the power system security under contingency situations. Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) is a versatile FACTS’s device which can independently or simultaneously control the active power, the reactive power, and the bus voltage to which it is connected [2]. However, to achieve such functionality of UPFC, it is highly important to determine the optimal location of this device in the power system with the appropriate parameter setting. Since UPFC can be installed in different locations, its effectiveness will be different. Therefore, we will face the problem of where we should install UPFC. For this reason, some performance indices must be satisfied. The following are some factors that can be considered in the selection of the optimal installation and parameter setting of UPFC: the stability margin improvement, the power transmission capacity increasing, and the power blackout prevention, etc. Therefore, conventional power flow algorithm [3] should incorporate with UPFC and the optimization should consider one, two, or all of the above mentioned factors. However, in this paper, we only consider blackout prevention, in other words, enhancing the security of power system under single line contingencies through installing UPFC in an optimal location with optimal parameter setting.

In the last decade, new algorithms have been developed for the optimal power flow incorporating with UPFC device as well as for the optimal placement of UPFC. Some of them are: a sensitivity-based approach which has been developed for finding suitable placement of UPFC [4], an evolutionary-programming-based load flow algorithm for systems containing unified power flow controllers [5], a Genetic Algorithm (GA) which proposed for solving the optimal location problem of UPFC [6], and a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for optimal location of FACTS devices [7].

Also a lot of work has been done in the contingency analysis research area. Different contingency selection methods can be found in [8], [9], [10]. Operation scheme of FACTS devices to enhance the power system steady-state security level considering a line contingency analysis is suggested in [11]. A method for contingency selection and security enhancement of power systems by optimal placement of FACTS devices using GA is presented in [12].

Recently, a new, easy to implement, reasonably fast, and robust Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) technique, known as Differential Evolution (DE) has been developed [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. DE has shown great promise in several applications including the field of power system [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. To the best of the author’s knowledge, the applications of the DE technique for optimal allocation of FACTS devices in general and UPFC in particular are rare in the open literature.

In this paper, one of the newest EAs techniques, namely DE, is applied to find out the optimal location and parameter setting of UPFC device for enhancing system security under single line contingencies through eliminating or minimizing the overloaded lines and the bus voltage limit violations. The performance of DE technique is also compared with that of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for different parameter initializations of both techniques.

Section snippets

UPFC power flow model

Fig. 1 shows the equivalent circuit of a UPFC power flow model, this circuit consists of two coordinated synchronous voltage sources represent the UPFC adequately for the purpose of fundamental steady-state analysis [28], the UPFC voltage sources are:EvR=VvR(cosδvR+jsinδvR)EcR=VcR(cosδcR+jsinδcR)

The active power demanded by the series converter is drawn by the shunt converter from the AC network and supplied to bus m through the DC link. The output voltage of the series voltage source (series

Overview of DE

DE is a parallel direct search method proposed by Storn and Price in 1995 [13]. Similar to other EAs techniques, DE is a heuristic, population-based optimization method that uses a population of points to search for a global minimum of a function over continuous search space. Basically, DE generates new vectors of parameter by adding the weighted difference between two population vectors to a third one. If the resulting individual provides a smaller objective function value than a predetermined

Simulation tools and power systems

Matlab programming codes for DE, PSO, and modified power flow algorithm to include UPFC are developed and incorporated together for the simulation purposes in this research. To investigate the validation and performance of the applied technique, DE is tested on the following two test systems: An IEEE 14-bus system and an IEEE 30-bus system. The data of the above mentioned systems are taken from [30], [31], respectively. Simulations are performed on Pentium IV, 2.66 GHz, and 512 MB of RAM computer.

Conclusion

In this paper, the effectiveness of the optimal installation of UPFC for enhancing the security of power systems under single line contingencies has been investigated. Determinations of the most severe contingency scenarios were performed based on the contingency selection and ranking process. One of the newest computational intelligence techniques, namely: DE has been successfully applied to the problem under consideration. Maximization of power system security is considered as the

Acknowledgments

The work was supported, in part, by the Chinese (CSC), and in part, by the Electric Power Security and High Efficiency Lab, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST). The authors would like to thank the both organizations for their support.

References (34)

  • S.K. Wang et al.

    Parameters tuning of power system stabilizers using improved ant direction hybrid differential evolution

    Int J Electr Power Energy Syst

    (2009)
  • D.K. He et al.

    A hybrid genetic algorithm approach based on differential evolution for economic dispatch with valve-point effect

    Int J Electr Power Energy Syst

    (2008)
  • N.G. Hingorani

    Power electronics in electrical utilities: role of power electronics in future power systems

    Proc IEEE

    (1988)
  • L. Gyugyi

    A unified power flow control concept for flexible AC transmission systems

    Proc IEE Part C

    (1992)
  • C.R. Puerle-Esquivel et al.

    A Newton-type algorithm for the control of power flow in electrical power networks

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1997)
  • Singh SN, Erlich I. Locating unified power flow controller for enhancing power system loadability. In: Int conf future...
  • K.P. Wang et al.

    Evolutionary-programming-based load flow algorithm for systems containing unified power flow controllers

    IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib

    (2003)
  • Arabkhaburi D, Kazemi A, Yari M, Aghaei J. Optimal placement of UPFC in power systems using genetic algorithm. In: IEEE...
  • Saravanan M, et al. Application of PSO technique for optimal location of FACST devices considering system loadability...
  • D. Sobajic et al.

    An artificial intelligence system for power system contingency screening

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1988)
  • C. Ejebe

    Fast contingency screening and evaluation for voltage stability analyses

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1988)
  • R. Chen

    Multi-contingency preprocessing for security analysis using physical concepts and CQR with classifications

    IEEE Trans Power Syst

    (1993)
  • Song SH, Lim JU, Jung SW, Moon SI. Preventive and corrective operation of FACTS devices to cope with a single...
  • Sudersan A, Abdelrahman M, Radman G. Contingency selection and static security enhancement in power systems using...
  • Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over...
  • Price KV. Differential evolution: a fast and simple numerical optimizer. In: Proc biennial conf North American fuzzy...
  • R. Storn et al.

    Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces

    J Global Optim

    (1997)
  • Cited by (132)

    • An improved Grey Wolf algorithm for optimal placement of unified power flow controller

      2022, Advances in Engineering Software
      Citation Excerpt :

      To discover the optimal location of UPFC for enhancing power system security, PSO and GA methods were introduced [15]. To obtain the optimal location and parameter configuration of the UPFC device for boosting system security during single line contingencies, the DE technique was used [16]. However, there have been very few works in the self-improved form of optimization in the optimal placement of the UPFC field.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text