Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions: Thinking Inside and Outside the Box

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2014.01.003Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Many health care facilities do not have antimicrobial stewardship programs in place.

  • Antimicrobial stewardship ward rounds offer an efficient way to improve the acceptance of stewardship recommendations.

  • Patients that report penicillin allergies often receive suboptimal treatment for infectious conditions so performing interventions to better identify those patients with true allergies, including penicillin skin testing, offer promise to providing more optimal care.

  • Patient transitions in care

Antimicrobial stewardship ward rounds

Many health care facilities have moved from a more tightly restricted system requiring preprescription authorization to a model that incorporates less restricted antimicrobial use up front but coupled with prospective audit and feedback, also know as postprescription review and feedback. Prospective audit and feedback to providers can be an effective method to improve judicious antimicrobial use. Many studies have shown significant reductions in inappropriate antimicrobial use, increases in

Improving the efficiency of prospective audit and feedback

Prospective audit and feedback can be daunting. The rate of inappropriate antibiotic use is estimated to range between 14% and 43% of all prescriptions.11 It is estimated that the average hospital uses 839 antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 patient-days; there are almost enough antibiotics for every hospitalized patient to receive a full daily dose of an antibiotic each day.12 The ability to effectively identify patients for prospective audit and feedback has prevented many centers from

Antimicrobial stewardship and antibiotic allergies

Often neglected but imperative considerations in antimicrobial stewardship are antibiotic allergies. Medication allergies are common, and of all antibiotic allergies penicillin is the most common, reported in 5% to 10% of patients.20 When treated for infections, patients with reported penicillin allergies often receive broader-spectrum, suboptimal, and even more toxic agents than patients without reported penicillin allergies. In addition, many alternative agents to β-lactams such as vancomycin

Antimicrobial stewardship at transitions in care

One area that has largely been excluded from stewardship interventions are transitions of care from one setting to another. It has long been recognized that patients are particularly vulnerable when they change from one patient care location to another or to home. Mistakes are often made when preparing a patient’s discharge medications. These pervasive mistakes include incorrect dosage, incorrect therapeutic drug monitoring, incorrect duration, and incorrect medication choice. Furthermore,

Antimicrobial stewardship at the end of life

Hospice promotes palliative care for patients who are terminally or seriously ill, and provides a noble way for these patients to approach the end of life. This philosophy of medical care shifts focus from aggressive treatments and diagnostic procedures to comfort. In this setting, medications and procedures that do not align with this philosophy are discontinued. As in almost all other health care settings, however, antimicrobial agents are perceived differently from other medications and are

Stewardship at the level of prescriber or unit

Guidelines and recommendations for antimicrobial stewardship have focused on the creation of centralized processes and infrastructure to promote judicious antimicrobial use (see Table 1). These programs generally require dedicated and trained personnel to regulate and monitor antimicrobial use. Many health care facilities lack resources and dedicated personnel to perform stewardship activities; therefore, stewardship is limited in most health care facilities. However, it may not be necessary to

Summary

Imprudent antimicrobial use is pervasive in the current health care environment. Relying on traditional methods of antimicrobial stewardship alone will not significantly limit inappropriate antibiotic use in the myriad health care settings. Identifying the areas where most inappropriate antibiotic use exists allows antimicrobial stewardship teams to leverage their resources most efficiently. Electronic alerts can broaden the scope of the audit process but also allow centers without significant

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (45)

  • L. Vitetta et al.

    Bacterial infections in terminally ill hospice patients

    J Pain Symptom Manage

    (2000)
  • P.D. Levin et al.

    End-of-life treatment and bacterial antibiotic resistance

    Chest

    (2010)
  • F.J. Cooke et al.

    The missing care bundle: antibiotic prescribing in hospitals

    Int J Antimicrob Agents

    (2007)
  • J.M. Rohde et al.

    Role of the hospitalist in antimicrobial stewardship: a review of work completed and description of multisite collaborative

    Clin Ther

    (2013)
  • T.H. Dellit et al.

    Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2007)
  • E.J. Septimus et al.

    Need and potential of antimicrobial stewardship in community hospitals

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2011)
  • S.D. Pope et al.

    Results of survey on implementation of Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2009)
  • P. Carling et al.

    Favorable impact of a multidisciplinary antibiotic management program conducted during 7 years

    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol

    (2003)
  • G.L. Fraser et al.

    Antibiotic optimization: an evaluation of patient safety and economic outcomes

    Arch Intern Med

    (1997)
  • D.H. Solomon et al.

    Academic detailing to improve use of broad-spectrum antibiotics at an academic medical center

    Arch Intern Med

    (2001)
  • K.A. Cairns et al.

    Early experience with antimicrobial stewardship ward rounds at a tertiary referral hospital

    Med J Aust

    (2012)
  • M.T. Hecker et al.

    Unnecessary use of antimicrobials in hospitalized patients: current patterns of misuse with an emphasis on the antianaerobic spectrum of activity

    Arch Intern Med

    (2003)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Collaborative Antimicrobial Stewardship: Working with Hospital and Health System Administration

      2020, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Whenever possible, align goals with issues that are viewed by administration as important or so-called burning-platform issues. Apply innovation to the request: think about so-called outside-the-box opportunities.23 Avoid business plans that focus solely on eliminating medication costs.24

    • Antimicrobial stewardship across 47 South African hospitals: an implementation study

      2016, The Lancet Infectious Diseases
      Citation Excerpt :

      We believe stewardship should be approached by means of a stepwise implementation of process improvement initiatives and principles targeted to institutional needs. By focusing on the so-called vital few (interventions),24 health-care facilities with limited resources and infectious diseases and microbiology expertise can have a substantial effect on antibiotic use with less effort, while embedding antimicrobial stewardship practices within existing resource structures and systems. This focus on key interventions ensures sustainability and provides a platform for targeting more complex stewardship interventions in the future.

    • Physician Perceptions Regarding Antimicrobial Use in End-of-Life Care

      2018, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures: Neither author has anything to disclose.

    View full text