Arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Human exposure through food chain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.01.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Although human exposure to arsenic is thought to be caused mainly through arsenic-contaminated underground drinking water, the use of this water for irrigation enhances the possibility of arsenic uptake into crop plants. Rice is the staple food grain in Bangladesh. Arsenic content in straw, grain and husk of rice is especially important since paddy fields are extensively irrigated with underground water having high level of arsenic concentration. However, straw and husk are widely used as cattle feed. Arsenic concentration in rice grain was 0.5±0.02 mg kg−1 with the highest concentrations being in grains grown on soil treated with 40 mg As kg−1 soil. With the average rice consumption between 400 and 650 g/day by typical adults in the arsenic-affected areas of Bangladesh, the intake of arsenic through rice stood at 0.20–0.35 mg/day. With a daily consumption of 4 L drinking water, arsenic intake through drinking water stands at 0.2 mg/day. Moreover, when the rice plant was grown in 60 mg of As kg−1 soil, arsenic concentrations in rice straw were 20.6±0.52 at panicle initiation stage and 23.7±0.44 at maturity stage, whereas it was 1.6±0.20 mg kg−1 in husk. Cattle drink a considerable amount of water. So alike human beings, arsenic gets deposited into cattle body through rice straw and husk as well as from drinking water which in turn finds a route into the human body. Arsenic intake in human body from rice and cattle could be potentially important and it exists in addition to that from drinking water. Therefore, a hypothesis has been put forward elucidating the possible food chain pathways through which arsenic may enter into human body.

Introduction

Arsenic contamination in ground water has turned into the gravest natural disaster and spatially encompasses Bangladesh, India (West Bengal), China, Taiwan, Vietnam, United States of America, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, etc. In Bangladesh, arsenic concentration in ground water has exceeds the safety level (0.05 mg As L−1 of water is the Bangladesh standard) in 59 districts out of 64 districts and about 80 million people are exposed to arsenic poisoning. The natural contamination of shallow hand tube wells in Bangladesh with arsenic has caused widespread human exposure to this toxic element through drinking water (Karim, 2000; Paul et al., 2000). Use of arsenic-contaminated shallow tube-well water for irrigation of crops has raised the following question: Is arsenic-contaminated drinking water the only pathway of human exposure to arsenic? If not, what are the other pathways through which such exposure is taking place? With this question in mind, we conducted glasshouse and field level experiments to investigate the concentrations of arsenic in rice, the main foodstuff of the population of Bangladeshis, and straw and husk of rice, the main fodder for cattle in the country.

The impact of arsenic-contaminated irrigation water on the arsenic content in rice is especially important as rice is the staple food for the population of arsenic-epidemic areas, and it is grown in flooded (reduced) condition where arsenic availability is high (Duxbury et al., 2003). Different consumers of natural ecosystem, such as primary, secondary or tertiary, are taking arsenic contaminated food and water, and as stated in reports, arsenic is getting deposited into their bodies (Bruce et al., 2003; Shariatpanahi and Anderson, 1984; Thornton and Webb, 1979).

Another important aspect of the present study is the extent and severity of arsenic poisoning in human body through these crop plants, directly or indirectly. We tried to trace food chain pathways of natural ecosystem through which arsenic may enter into human body so that we can assess the potentiality of these pathways in exposing human to arsenic. It is quite difficult to investigate all the arsenic-transferring food chain pathways of natural ecosystem even in small scale. So in this paper, we focused mainly on the extent and severity of arsenic poisoning in human body through “Plant (rice)–Animal (cattle)–Man” food chain pathway.

Section snippets

Soil preparation

Pot experiments were conducted in a glasshouse at Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI). Soil, collected from BRRI farm at a depth of 0–15 cm, were sun dried for 7 days and then the massive aggregates were broken down by gentle crushing with hammer. The unwanted materials, viz. dry roots, grasses, stones were removed from the bulk soil. Then the soil was mixed thoroughly, crushed and sieved with 2 mm sieve. Sample from this initial soil was collected into a plastic bottle for physico-chemical

Results and discussion

To investigate the potential of “plant–human” food chain pathway in arsenic poisoning of human body, we determined the arsenic concentration in tissues of rice. A hypothesis may also demonstrated from it reflecting the possibility of arsenic poisoning of human body through different food chain pathways, especially the “Plant–Animal–Man”, on the basis of data of “plant–human” food chain pathway. In the first phase of this experiment, rice was cultivated in artificially spiked soil with different

Conclusion

Many previous reports demonstrated that foodstuffs collected from arsenic epidemic areas contain significant concentrations of arsenic. Roychowdhury et al. (2002) reported the arsenic concentrations in individual composites of cooked items, collected from an arsenic epidemic area of West Bengal, India, as rice (between 374.17 and 666.57 μg kg−1), freshwater fish (between 830 and 900 μg kg−1), potato curry (186 μg kg−1), potato skin fried in oil (617 μg kg−1), leaf of vegetables (578 μg kg−1), mixed

Acknowledgment

Authors are grateful to the Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI) for kindly allowing to do the experiments at their Arsenic Laboratory, Soil Science Division. Authors are also thankful to Mr. Mosharraf Hossain for his sincere help in preparing this manuscript. The first author is thankful to the Ministry of Science, Information and Communication Technology, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, for awarding the NSICT fellowship for this research work.

References (44)

  • M.J. Abedin et al.

    Uptake kinetics of arsenic species in rice plants

    Plant Physiol.

    (2002)
  • A.H. Ackerman et al.

    Comparison of a chemical and enzymatic extraction of arsenic from rice and an assessment of the arsenic absorption from contaminated water by cooked rice

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2005)
  • F.B. Anastasia et al.

    The influence of soil arsenic on the growth of lowberry bush

    Environ. Qual.

    (1973)
  • Campbell, J.A., Stark, J.H., Carlton-Smith, C.H., 1985. In: International Symposium on Heavy Metals in the Environment,...
  • A.A. Carbonell et al.

    The influence of arsenic chemical form and concentration on Spertina partens and Spertina alterniflora growth and tissue arsenic concentration

    Plant Soil

    (1998)
  • J.C. Chen et al.

    Human carcinogenicity and antherogenicity induced by chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic

  • S. D’llio et al.

    Arsenic content of various types of rice as determined by plasma-based techniques

    Microchem. J.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Duxbury et al.

    Food chain aspects of arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: effects on quality and productivity of rice

    Environ. Sci. Health

    (2003)
  • J.G. Farmer et al.

    Assessment of occupational exposure to inorganic arsenic based on urinary concentrations and speciation of arsenic

    Br. J. Ind. Med.

    (1990)
  • Q.Q. Jiang et al.

    Effect of different form and sources of arsenite on crop yield and arsenic concentration

    Water, Air Soil Pollut.

    (1994)
  • L.R. Johnson et al.

    Arsenic content of soil and crops following use of methanearsonate herbicides

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.

    (1969)
  • R.A. Khattak et al.

    Accumulation and interactions of arsenic, selenium, molybdenum and phosphorus in alfalfa

    Environ. Qual.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (197)

    • Global arsenic dilemma and sustainability

      2022, Journal of Hazardous Materials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text