Comparative study on chemical pretreatment methods for improving enzymatic digestibility of crofton weed stem
Introduction
Crofton weed (Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng) is a tufty, semi-shrubby, perennial herbaceous plant of about 1–2 m in height. It is native to Central America, mainly Mexico, although it is now distributed widely in the United States of America, Australia, New Zealand and many countries in Southeast Asia. This exotic weed prefers a warm and wet environment, but its ability to adapt to different environmental conditions is very strong. It can grow in environments with temperature ranges from 5 °C to 42 °C on dry and barren hills, and can even grow in cracks in stone walls and houses (Sun, 2003). Since the 1950s, this exotic plant has spread rapidly across southwest China, damaging native ecosystems and causing great economic losses (Yu et al., 2005). Many farmlands, pasture fields and forests have been destroyed by the weed. Much attention has been paid to management of this weed and several methods have been developed to control it, including manual, chemical and biological control, however, no obvious progress is made. The weed is still spreading from southwest to northeast at a rate of 10–60 km per year in China (Lu et al., 2005).
Compared with simple control processes, utilization of the weed gives more benefits. According to the published literatures, the weed can be used as bio-pesticide (Wang et al., 2002, Liu et al., 2004, Kaushal et al., 2001), organic fertilizer and feedstuff, feedstock for production of marsh gas (Patrabansh and Madan, 2000). We determined the glycan content in the stem of this weed and found that it was similar to that of some agricultural wastes, such as corn stover, rice straw and wheat straw. Therefore, in this article, it was proposed to use the weed as a biomass resource to produce fermentable sugars for further production of biofuel such as ethanol, instead of just simply controlling it.
There are two common ways to convert lignocellulosic biomass to sugars, namely acid hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis. Acid hydrolysis has been developed for a long time for direct saccharification. It is also a pretreatment method for improving the enzymatic digestibility of biomass. Enzymatic saccharification is a promising way because of the advantages such as low energy input, less pollution, no side products and so on, but the low enzymatic accessibility of the native cellulose is a key problem for biomass-to-ethanol processes. Therefore, pretreatment is an essential element in the bioconversion of lignocellulosic substrates. The objective of this article is thus to investigate the effect of different chemical pretreatment processes on the enzymatic digestibility of the weed stem, in order to obtain a high enzymatic conversion ratio of cellulose-to-sugar and preliminarily study the possibility of utilization of the weed for production of fermentable sugars.
Section snippets
Materials and analytical methods
Crofton weed was obtained from Lincang city, Yunnan province in Southwestern China. Its stem was air dried, crushed and screened. The fraction collected between 20 and 40 mesh was used in all the experiments. The chemical compositions were determined according to the corresponding Chinese Standards as follows: moisture content, GB/T 2677.2-1993; ash, GB/T 2677.3-1993; hot water extractives, GB/T 2677.4-1993; 1% NaOH extractives, GB/T 2677.5-1993; benzene–ethanol extractives, GB/T 2677.6-1994;
Chemical composition of the weed stem
The composition of the weed stem used in this study is presented in Table 1. Some typical agricultural residues are also listed in the table for comparison. It can be seen that the holocellulose and cellulose content in the weed stem were similar to those of corn stover and wheat straw, but much higher than that of cotton stalk. The weed also had a much higher content of benzene–ethanol extractives. According to some reports, these extractives contain some allelochemicals that can inhibit the
Conclusions
The stem of crofton weed had a content of glycan similar to those of corn stover and wheat straw. It is possible to utilize the weed as a feedstock to produce fermentable sugars for further production of biofuel such as ethanol. Mild sulfuric acid pretreatment could obtain a relatively high yield of sugars in the pretreatment, but it led to only a slight enhancement of enzymatic digestibility. NaOH pretreatment could obtain a higher enzymatic conversion ratio of cellulose compared with H2SO4
References (20)
- et al.
Hepatotoxicity in rat induced by partially purified toxins from Eupatorium adenophorum (Ageratina adenophora)
Toxicon
(2001) - et al.
Effect of structural features on enzyme digestibility of corn stover
Bioresour. Technol.
(2006) - et al.
Acetosolv delignification of depithed cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) stalks
Ind. Crop. Prod.
(2007) - et al.
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
Bioresour. Technol.
(2005) - et al.
Fractionation of wheat straw by atmospheric acetic acid process
Bioresour. Technol.
(2005) - et al.
A comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for improving saccharification of cotton stalks
Bioresour. Technol.
(2007) - et al.
Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review
Bioresour. Technol.
(2002) - et al.
Optimizing peracetic acid pretreatment conditions for improved simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) of sugar cane bagasse to ethanol fuel
Renew. Energ.
(1999) - et al.
Increased digestibility of cedar by pretreatment with peracetic acid and steam explosion
Biotechnol. Bioeng.
(1988) - et al.
Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity
Appl. Biochem. Biotech
(2000)
Cited by (123)
Pretreatment with ChOH/Urea under mild conditions for the efficient deconstruction of poplar cell wall
2023, Industrial Crops and ProductsAdvances and sustainable conversion of waste lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels
2022, Biofuels and Bioenergy: A Techno-Economic ApproachWaste pretreatment technologies for hydrogen production
2021, Waste to Renewable Biohydrogen: Volume 1: Advances in Theory and Experiments