Cancer stem cell-like cells from a single cell of oral squamous carcinoma cell lines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.084Get rights and content

Abstract

Resistance of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) to conventional chemotherapy or radiation therapy might be due to cancer stem cells (CSCs). The development of novel anticancer drugs requires a simple method for the enrichment of CSCs. CSCs can be enriched from OSCC cell lines, for example, after cultivation in serum-free cell culture medium (SFM). In our study, we analyzed four OSCC cell lines for the presence of CSCs. CSC-like cells could not be enriched with SFM. However, cell lines obtained from holoclone colonies showed CSC-like properties such as a reduced rate of cell proliferation and a reduced sensitivity to Paclitaxel in comparison to cells from the parental lineage. Moreover, these cell lines differentially expressed the CSC-marker CD133, which is also upregulated in OSCC tissues. Interestingly, CD133+ cells in OSCC tissues expressed little to no Ki67, the cell proliferation marker that also indicates reduced drug sensitivity. Our study shows a method for the isolation of CSC-like cell lines from OSCC cell lines. These CSC-like cell lines could be new targets for the development of anticancer drugs under in vitro conditions.

Research highlights

► Four oral squamous cancer cell lines (OSCCL) were analyzed for cancer stem cells (CSCs). ► Single cell derived colonies of OSCCL express CSC-marker CD133 differentially. ► Monoclonal cell lines showed reduced sensitivity for Paclitaxel. ► In situ CD133+ cells are slow cycling (Ki67-) indicating a reduced drug sensitivity. ► CD133+ and CSC-like cells can be obtained from single colony forming cells of OSCCL.

Introduction

Worldwide, approximately 700,000 people develop head and neck carcinomas each year, especially squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx [1]. Head and neck cancer is listed in sixth place among the most common malignant tumors worldwide and is responsible for ∼350,000 cancer deaths per year [2]. Unfortunately, the incidence of oral tumors is increasing around the world [3], [4].

The current treatment strategy for carcinomas attempts to attack homogenous cancerous tissues. Recently, data shows that tumors are organized as hierarchical tissues containing various differentiated cells with a small subpopulation of undifferentiated cells, so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are the focus of a new strategy of treatment [5], [6], [7]. In models of CSCs, these cells exclusively have the capability for tumor formation and growth, and are possibly slow-cycling cells resistant to therapies targeting fast proliferating cells [8]. This tumor-initiating cells hypothesis has recently been tested for a number of diseases including squamous cell carcinoma [9]. The isolation of CSCs makes the discovery of more efficient cancer treatment strategies possible.

Although the existence of CSCs has been demonstrated for many tumors, the isolation of these tumor-initiating cells is still difficult because a definitely unique CSC-marker is not available. One possible marker of CSCs is the surface marker CD133 [10], [11]. This surface marker, also known as AC133 and Prominin-1, is expressed in glioblastoma cells [12]. A method for the enrichment of oral squamous cell carcinoma CSCs (OSCCSCs) was the cultivation of oral squamous cell carcinoma lines in serum-free cell culture medium [13]. Here, cells formed spheres and expressed pluripotent stem cell markers such as Oct-4 and the CSC-marker CD133. Interestingly, in comparison to their parental OSCC cell line, these OSCCSCs demonstrated increased cell viability after treatment with known anticancer treatments such as Paclitaxel or radiation therapy under in vivo and in vitro conditions [13], [10]. CSC-like cells, which have some properties of multipotent stem cells, can also be enriched from established cancer cell lines after treatment with anticancer drugs such as cisplatin [14], [15]. Interestingly, the proliferation of a myriad of CSCs depends on the activation of the WNT pathway, an important target of novel CSC drugs [14], [10], [9].

Harper et al. identified CSCs in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines [16], [17]. This study obtained colonies with variable morphologies from single cell suspension of HNSCC cells, which defines the degree of cell differentiation. Colonies with holoclone morphology contain undifferentiated, stem cell-like cells. The formation of paraclones or meroclones reveals cells with a higher degree of differentiation that are less likely that to contain CSCs [16], [17]. Moreover, Locke et al. have demonstrated that the pattern of stem cells and differentiated cells is robust and persists even in cancer cell lines [16].

We investigated OSCC cell lines from tissues with variable degrees of differentiation for CSCs. Cell lines were evaluated for their expression of stem cell markers such as CD133, their ability to form colonies in standard medium and their potential for cultivation and enrichment of CSC-like cells under serum-free cell culture conditions. We reveal that cell lines with CSC-like qualities could be obtained from holoclone colonies of established OSCC cell lines. Cells obtained from these holoclone colonies had differentially expressed the stem cell marker CD133. In contrast to parental cell lines, WNT signaling stimulates cell proliferation of these holoclone-derived cells.

Section snippets

Cell culture

OSCC cell lines PCI-4A, PCI-8, PCI-9A and PCI-13 were kindly provided by Dr. Theresa L. Whiteside (University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The tumors were highly (PCI-4A), moderately (PCI-8, PCI-9A) or poorly (PCI-13) differentiated. Cells were cultivated with high glucose DMEM (PAA, Pasching, Austria) supplemented with 10% FBS (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) and P/S (Gibco). The medium was changed every two to three days and the cells were passaged prior to reaching confluence. For cultivation in

Characterization of OSCC cell lines

Four different OSCC cell lines (for details see materials and methods) were investigated for the expression of stem/progenitor cell markers, the existence of CD133 subpopulations, sphere formation and colony forming efficiency. A RT-PCR analysis demonstrated the expression of markers that are associated with stem cells such as OCT4, ABCG2, CD133, Nestin, cytokeratin 15, and CD44 (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, some stem/progenitor cell marker genes such as CD133 and Nestin are expressed at higher

Discussion

The isolation and characterization of CSCs is an ambitious target of tumor biology. Previous studies showed that CSCs could persist in established cell lines that were derived from cancer tissues [14], [16], [13], [10], [17]. Chiou et al. [13] isolated and cultivated CSCs as spheroid cell clusters similar to neural stem cells, which differentially expressed typical pluripotent stem cell markers such as Oct-4. Oct-4 is purported to be a reliable marker for CSCs [13], [20], [21]. Investigated

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References (27)

  • P. Dalerba et al.

    Cancer stem cells: models and concepts

    Annu. Rev. Med.

    (2007)
  • N.A. Lobo et al.

    The biology of cancer stem cells

    Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2007)
  • J. Huelsken

    Tissue-specific stem cells: friend or foe?

    Cell Res.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (60)

    • A novel reporter construct for screening small molecule inhibitors that specifically target self-renewing cancer cells

      2019, Experimental Cell Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although many of the reports suggest CD44 as a marker for CSCs in oral carcinoma [33–36], it is very difficult to accept it as a sole marker, since CD44 is expressed in most of the normal squamous epithelial cells till terminal differentiation [37]. CD133, CD117 and c-Met are other surface markers reported for oral cancer [38–41]. A recent review suggests CD44, ALDH1, CD133, OCT3/4, NANOG, and SOX2 as the key CSC-associated molecules, and they propose that a single common CSC sorting marker does not exist [42].

    • Investigation of ovatodiolide, a macrocyclic diterpenoid, as a potential inhibitor of oral cancer stem-like cells properties via the inhibition of the JAK2/STAT3/JARID1B signal circuit

      2018, Phytomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      These results are indicative of the ability of Ova to effectively inhibit tumor growth and enhance sensitivity oral cancer cells to cisplatin not only in vitro, but also in vivo. In concordance with findings from other cancer types, Nassar and his colleagues in their work emphasized the nefarious role of CSCs in secondary or primary resistance of OSCC cells to conventional chemotherapy or radiation therapy, making a case for and highlighting the need for the discovery and/or development of novel anticancer drugs that preferentially target CSCs-enrichment in oral cancer cells (Nassar and Blanpain, 2016; Felthaus et al., 2011). Recently, our team demonstrated that Ova eliminates the CSCs population and their associated CSCs-like phenotype in breast (Lu et al., 2016) and pancreatic (Hsieh et al., 2016) cancer cells through modulation of stemness, oncogenic, and inflammatory signaling.

    • Application of single-cell technology in cancer research

      2017, Biotechnology Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, CTC clusters have been shown to form metastatic lesions more easily than single tumor cells (Jansson et al., 2016; Mu et al., 2015) (Table 1). Besides CTCs, single-cell methods can also be used to isolate and analyze other rare tumor cells such as CSCs and tumor cells in the urine or bone marrow, providing new ways for cancer diagnosis and treatment (Felthaus et al., 2011; Grun et al., 2015; Nickens et al., 2015; Wu and Tzanakakis, 2013; Yang et al., 2017). In contrast to routine histopathology and serial step section analysis, single-cell methods have an increased detection rate of early tumor dissemination (Schilling et al., 2010).

    • Gemcitabine treatment promotes pancreatic cancer stemness through the Nox/ROS/NF-κB/STAT3 signaling cascade

      2016, Cancer Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of potential mechanisms account for the increase in CSCs after gemcitabine treatment, including dedifferentiation and enrichment. It has been shown that CSCs can derive from cells that make up the majority of tumor due to gene mutation or epigenetic alterations [49,50]. The flexible state of cancer cells between CSCs and the bulk of cancer cells can even be aggravated with changes in the tumor microenvironment, such as hypoxia, nutrient deprivation, or chemotherapeutics [51,52].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text