Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 44, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages 98-108
Automatica

Lyapunov control methods of closed quantum systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2007.05.013Get rights and content

Abstract

According to special geometric or physical meanings, the paper summarizes three Lyapunov functions in controlling closed quantum systems and their controller designing processes. Specially, for the average value-based method, the paper gives the generalized condition of the largest invariant set in the original reference and develops the construction method of the imaginary mechanical quantity; for the error-based method, this paper gives its strict mathematical proof train of thought on the asymptotic stability and the corresponding physical meaning. Also, we study the relations among the three Lyapunov functions and give a unified form of these Lyapunov functions. Finally, we compare the control effects of three Lyapunov methods by doing some simulation experiments.

Introduction

Since the mid-1990s, with the development of femtosecond laser technology and the appearance of a series of research results (Armen et al., 2002, Geremia et al., 2003, Zhang et al., 2000) on quantum information technology, quantum measurement, and quantum clone technology, people have shown great interests in the feedback control of quantum systems, for example, Markovian feedback in quantum optics (Wiseman & Milburn, 1993), feedback based on estimation and filtering (Doherty and Jacobs, 1999, Edwards and Belavkin, 2005), etc. But, the super-short control time required by some quantum dynamics (e.g., molecular dynamics) restricts the application of observation and feedback, so the prevailing control style has been open loop control. In fact, for the same reason and some limitations of quantum measurement itself, currently open loop control remains dominant. Generally speaking, quantum systems may be divided into two classes: closed quantum systems and open quantum systems. A closed quantum system evolves unitarily, whose dynamics is governed by the Schrödinger equation or the non-dissipative Liouville–von Neumann equation. The dynamics of an open quantum system is no longer unitary due to interaction with its environment. In open loop quantum control, the state steering of closed systems is a class of important problems, i.e., given an initial state and a goal one, how to find some realizable controls to drive the initial state to the goal one (Cong, 2006).

Undoubtedly, optimal control techniques are important approaches. In the techniques, the control aims are often to solve steering problems in a complex numerical iterative fashion to search for the control field while minimizing an energy-type cost functional of the control that usually requires a maximal transition probability from an initial state to a particular goal state (D’Alessandro and Dahleh, 2001, Kuang and Cong, 2006, Schirmer et al., 1999, Shi and Rabitz, 1990, Zhu and Rabitz, 1998) (see also, the references herein). Sugawara developed a general local control theory for manipulating quantum dynamics, which is a generalization of the local optimization approaches and can be used in transition path control, population distribution control, and wave packet shaping (Sugawara, 2003). The decoupling techniques based on an adaptive tracking algorithm can be used to address quantum control problems (Zhu & Rabitz, 2003). With tracking, the control is obtained without iteration by following an explicit pathway, but the price paid for eliminating iteration is the need to manage possible field singularities arising along the control pathway. The factorization techniques of the unitary group also can be used to implement state steering (Altafini, 2002, Constantinescu and Ramakrishna, 2003, Ramakrishna et al., 2002). They are based on explicit generation of unitary operators by using Lie group decompositions. In addition, Lyapunov-based techniques are good approaches (Cong & Kuang, 2007; Ferrante, Pavon, & Raccanelli, 2002a; Ferrante, Pavon, & Raccanelli, 2002b; Grivopoulos & Bamieh, 2003; Mirrahimi, Rouchon, & Turinici, 2005; Paolo, 2002). In such methods, the control laws can be obtained when the first-order time derivative of a selected Lyapunov function is kept non-positive.

In principle, as long as a quantum system is controllable, one can design the desired control laws. An advantage of the Lyapunov method is that the designed control laws would not make the closed-loop system divergent. A key problem in such a method is to select appropriate Lyapunov functions. Generally speaking, different Lyapunov functions will lead to different designed control laws and different control effects. Designing Lyapunov functions from some special geometric or physical meanings is a good approach. In Cong and Kuang (2007), we selected a distance-based Lyapunov function to design the corresponding control laws and obtained the conditions for the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system by linearizing the unitary operator of the state. On the basis of such a study, the main works in this paper include summarizing the Lyapunov-based design methods for the control of closed quantum systems, analyzing the corresponding asymptotic stability of the closed-loop systems, and comparing several involved Lyapunov methods by doing some simulation experiments.

This paper only treats finite dimensional quantum systems and assumes that the systems of interest are controllable. Two state vectors |ψ1 and |ψ2 which satisfy |ψ1=eiθ|ψ2 are called equivalent state vectors. In order to avoid the trouble caused by the global phase in the equivalence class, we will disregard the global phase between equivalent states and think of all the states in an equivalence class as the same state. For the state steering problems in closed quantum systems, this paper will study the following three Lyapunov functions: Lyapunov functions based on the state distance, on the average value of an imaginary mechanical quantity, and on the state error. In Section 2, the Lyapunov method based on the state distance is given, which contains the design of control laws and the main results on stability. In Section 3, the Lyapunov method based on the average value is studied, where we relax some conditions for the largest invariant set in Grivopoulos and Bamieh (2003), and analyze and give the construction method of an imaginary mechanical quantity P. Section 4 contains some results of the Lyapunov method based on the state error. Especially, we study relations among three Lyapunov functions and give a unified form of these Lyapunov functions. The control laws in the three methods are applied to a spin-12 particle system and a five-level system in Section 5, in which the control effects of the three Lyapunov methods are compared and analyzed. In Section 6, we conclude the paper with brief remarks.

Section snippets

The Lyapunov method based on the state distance

There are many notions of the distance between states (Zyczkowski & Słomczyński, 2001). Following Paolo (2002), here we select a function based on the Hilbert–Schmidt distance between the controlled state |ψ and the desired goal state |ψf as a Lyapunov function, i.e.,V1=12(1-|ψf|ψ|2),where |ψf|ψ|2 represents the transition probability from |ψ into |ψf.

With the action of control fields, the state evolution equation of closed quantum systems is the following Schrödinger equation: i|ψ˙(t)

The Lyapunov method based on the average value of an imaginary mechanical quantity

In this section we will reexplain the Lyapunov function in the original reference (Grivopoulos & Bamieh, 2003) and develop the idea of the controller designing. Assume that Hermitian operator P is a mechanical quantity of the quantum system. According to quantum theory, if the system is in an eigenstate of P, then the average value of P is the eigenvalue corresponding to the eigenstate of P. From this point of view, we can try to think of the average value of P as a Lyapunov function, i.e.,V2=ψ

The Lyapunov method based on the state error

The control strategy based on the error is widely applied to classical control systems. It achieves the control object by reducing continually the error between the controlled state and the goal state. This idea may be used to quantum systems. The Lyapunov function of system (2) is taken as (Mirrahimi & Rouchon, 2004)V3=12ψ-ψf|ψ-ψfwith the constraint (3). In fact, ψ-ψf|ψ-ψf is also the square of the Euclidean distance between |ψ and |ψf in the state space. By simple computations, one can

Numerical simulation examples

In order to illustrate the effectiveness of the three methods in this paper and compare their advantages and disadvantages, we will do the simulation experiments on two controlled systems: a spin-12 particle system and a five-level quantum system.

Conclusions

For the closed quantum systems described by pure states, this paper summarizes three Lyapunov functions of different geometric or physical meanings and their controller designing processes, points out and proves the key problems in analyzing the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop systems, and appropriately develops some results. Specially, we study the relations among the three Lyapunov functions and compare the control effects of the three methods by the simulation experiments. From the

Sen Kuang was born in Xinye County, Henan Province, PR China in 1976. He received a B.S. degree in Industrial Automation from Henan Polytechnic University in 1999. Then he worked in the Hebi Coal Mine Bureau. He received an M.S. degree in Control Theory and Control Engineering from Henan Polytechnic University in 2003. Now he is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Science and Technology of China. His current research interests include quantum feedback control and its state estimation, and

References (30)

  • S. Cong et al.

    Quantum control strategy based on state distance

    Acta Automatica Sinica

    (2007)
  • M. Mirrahimi et al.

    Lyapunov control of bilinear Schrödinger equations

    Automatica

    (2005)
  • C.W. Zhang et al.

    Quantum clone and state estimation for n-state system

    Physics Letters A

    (2000)
  • C. Altafini

    Controllability of quantum mechanical systems by root space decomposition of su(n)

    Journal of Mathematical Physics

    (2002)
  • M.A. Armen et al.

    Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase

    Physical Review Letters

    (2002)
  • S. Cong

    The questions studied in quantum mechanical system control

    Automation Panorama

    (2004)
  • S. Cong

    State modeling in quantum system control

    Control and Decision

    (2004)
  • S. Cong

    Introduction to quantum mechanical system control

    (2006)
  • T. Constantinescu et al.

    Parametrizing quantum states and channels

    Quantum Information Processing

    (2003)
  • D. D’Alessandro et al.

    Optimal control of two-level quantum systems

    IEEE Transactions on Automation Control

    (2001)
  • A.C. Doherty et al.

    Feedback control of quantum systems using continuous state estimation

    Physical Review A

    (1999)
  • Edwards, S. C., & Belavkin, V. P. (2005). Optimal quantum filtering and quantum feedback control. eprint arXiv:...
  • Ferrante, A., Pavon, M., & Raccanelli, G. (2002a). Control of quantum systems using model-based feedback strategies. In...
  • Ferrante, A., Pavon, M., & Raccanelli, G. (2002b). Driving the propagator of a spin system: A feedback approach. In...
  • J.M. Geremia et al.

    Quantum Kalman filtering and the Heisenberg limit for atomic magnetometry

    Physical Review Letters

    (2003)
  • Cited by (173)

    • Non-Markovian quantum Hadamard gate preparation in a hybrid bath: A Lyapunov approach

      2023, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Sen Kuang was born in Xinye County, Henan Province, PR China in 1976. He received a B.S. degree in Industrial Automation from Henan Polytechnic University in 1999. Then he worked in the Hebi Coal Mine Bureau. He received an M.S. degree in Control Theory and Control Engineering from Henan Polytechnic University in 2003. Now he is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Science and Technology of China. His current research interests include quantum feedback control and its state estimation, and quantum optimal control.

    Shuang Cong was born in Hefei, PR China in 1961. She received a B.S. degree in Automatic Control from Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics in 1982, and a Ph.D. degree in System Engineering from the University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy, in 1995. She is currently a professor in the Department of Automation at the University of Science and Technology of China. Her research interests include advanced control strategies for motion control, fuzzy logic control, neural networks design and applications, robotic coordination control, and quantum system control.

    This paper was not presented at any IFAC meeting. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Yong-Yan Cao under the direction of Editor Mituhiko Araki.

    View full text