Lyapunov control methods of closed quantum systems☆
Introduction
Since the mid-1990s, with the development of femtosecond laser technology and the appearance of a series of research results (Armen et al., 2002, Geremia et al., 2003, Zhang et al., 2000) on quantum information technology, quantum measurement, and quantum clone technology, people have shown great interests in the feedback control of quantum systems, for example, Markovian feedback in quantum optics (Wiseman & Milburn, 1993), feedback based on estimation and filtering (Doherty and Jacobs, 1999, Edwards and Belavkin, 2005), etc. But, the super-short control time required by some quantum dynamics (e.g., molecular dynamics) restricts the application of observation and feedback, so the prevailing control style has been open loop control. In fact, for the same reason and some limitations of quantum measurement itself, currently open loop control remains dominant. Generally speaking, quantum systems may be divided into two classes: closed quantum systems and open quantum systems. A closed quantum system evolves unitarily, whose dynamics is governed by the Schrödinger equation or the non-dissipative Liouville–von Neumann equation. The dynamics of an open quantum system is no longer unitary due to interaction with its environment. In open loop quantum control, the state steering of closed systems is a class of important problems, i.e., given an initial state and a goal one, how to find some realizable controls to drive the initial state to the goal one (Cong, 2006).
Undoubtedly, optimal control techniques are important approaches. In the techniques, the control aims are often to solve steering problems in a complex numerical iterative fashion to search for the control field while minimizing an energy-type cost functional of the control that usually requires a maximal transition probability from an initial state to a particular goal state (D’Alessandro and Dahleh, 2001, Kuang and Cong, 2006, Schirmer et al., 1999, Shi and Rabitz, 1990, Zhu and Rabitz, 1998) (see also, the references herein). Sugawara developed a general local control theory for manipulating quantum dynamics, which is a generalization of the local optimization approaches and can be used in transition path control, population distribution control, and wave packet shaping (Sugawara, 2003). The decoupling techniques based on an adaptive tracking algorithm can be used to address quantum control problems (Zhu & Rabitz, 2003). With tracking, the control is obtained without iteration by following an explicit pathway, but the price paid for eliminating iteration is the need to manage possible field singularities arising along the control pathway. The factorization techniques of the unitary group also can be used to implement state steering (Altafini, 2002, Constantinescu and Ramakrishna, 2003, Ramakrishna et al., 2002). They are based on explicit generation of unitary operators by using Lie group decompositions. In addition, Lyapunov-based techniques are good approaches (Cong & Kuang, 2007; Ferrante, Pavon, & Raccanelli, 2002a; Ferrante, Pavon, & Raccanelli, 2002b; Grivopoulos & Bamieh, 2003; Mirrahimi, Rouchon, & Turinici, 2005; Paolo, 2002). In such methods, the control laws can be obtained when the first-order time derivative of a selected Lyapunov function is kept non-positive.
In principle, as long as a quantum system is controllable, one can design the desired control laws. An advantage of the Lyapunov method is that the designed control laws would not make the closed-loop system divergent. A key problem in such a method is to select appropriate Lyapunov functions. Generally speaking, different Lyapunov functions will lead to different designed control laws and different control effects. Designing Lyapunov functions from some special geometric or physical meanings is a good approach. In Cong and Kuang (2007), we selected a distance-based Lyapunov function to design the corresponding control laws and obtained the conditions for the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system by linearizing the unitary operator of the state. On the basis of such a study, the main works in this paper include summarizing the Lyapunov-based design methods for the control of closed quantum systems, analyzing the corresponding asymptotic stability of the closed-loop systems, and comparing several involved Lyapunov methods by doing some simulation experiments.
This paper only treats finite dimensional quantum systems and assumes that the systems of interest are controllable. Two state vectors and which satisfy are called equivalent state vectors. In order to avoid the trouble caused by the global phase in the equivalence class, we will disregard the global phase between equivalent states and think of all the states in an equivalence class as the same state. For the state steering problems in closed quantum systems, this paper will study the following three Lyapunov functions: Lyapunov functions based on the state distance, on the average value of an imaginary mechanical quantity, and on the state error. In Section 2, the Lyapunov method based on the state distance is given, which contains the design of control laws and the main results on stability. In Section 3, the Lyapunov method based on the average value is studied, where we relax some conditions for the largest invariant set in Grivopoulos and Bamieh (2003), and analyze and give the construction method of an imaginary mechanical quantity P. Section 4 contains some results of the Lyapunov method based on the state error. Especially, we study relations among three Lyapunov functions and give a unified form of these Lyapunov functions. The control laws in the three methods are applied to a spin- particle system and a five-level system in Section 5, in which the control effects of the three Lyapunov methods are compared and analyzed. In Section 6, we conclude the paper with brief remarks.
Section snippets
The Lyapunov method based on the state distance
There are many notions of the distance between states (Zyczkowski & Słomczyński, 2001). Following Paolo (2002), here we select a function based on the Hilbert–Schmidt distance between the controlled state and the desired goal state as a Lyapunov function, i.e.,where represents the transition probability from into .
With the action of control fields, the state evolution equation of closed quantum systems is the following Schrödinger equation:
The Lyapunov method based on the average value of an imaginary mechanical quantity
In this section we will reexplain the Lyapunov function in the original reference (Grivopoulos & Bamieh, 2003) and develop the idea of the controller designing. Assume that Hermitian operator P is a mechanical quantity of the quantum system. According to quantum theory, if the system is in an eigenstate of P, then the average value of P is the eigenvalue corresponding to the eigenstate of P. From this point of view, we can try to think of the average value of P as a Lyapunov function, i.e.,
The Lyapunov method based on the state error
The control strategy based on the error is widely applied to classical control systems. It achieves the control object by reducing continually the error between the controlled state and the goal state. This idea may be used to quantum systems. The Lyapunov function of system (2) is taken as (Mirrahimi & Rouchon, 2004)with the constraint (3). In fact, is also the square of the Euclidean distance between and in the state space. By simple computations, one can
Numerical simulation examples
In order to illustrate the effectiveness of the three methods in this paper and compare their advantages and disadvantages, we will do the simulation experiments on two controlled systems: a spin- particle system and a five-level quantum system.
Conclusions
For the closed quantum systems described by pure states, this paper summarizes three Lyapunov functions of different geometric or physical meanings and their controller designing processes, points out and proves the key problems in analyzing the asymptotic stability of the closed-loop systems, and appropriately develops some results. Specially, we study the relations among the three Lyapunov functions and compare the control effects of the three methods by the simulation experiments. From the
Sen Kuang was born in Xinye County, Henan Province, PR China in 1976. He received a B.S. degree in Industrial Automation from Henan Polytechnic University in 1999. Then he worked in the Hebi Coal Mine Bureau. He received an M.S. degree in Control Theory and Control Engineering from Henan Polytechnic University in 2003. Now he is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Science and Technology of China. His current research interests include quantum feedback control and its state estimation, and
References (30)
- et al.
Quantum control strategy based on state distance
Acta Automatica Sinica
(2007) - et al.
Lyapunov control of bilinear Schrödinger equations
Automatica
(2005) - et al.
Quantum clone and state estimation for -state system
Physics Letters A
(2000) Controllability of quantum mechanical systems by root space decomposition of su(n)
Journal of Mathematical Physics
(2002)- et al.
Adaptive homodyne measurement of optical phase
Physical Review Letters
(2002) The questions studied in quantum mechanical system control
Automation Panorama
(2004)State modeling in quantum system control
Control and Decision
(2004)Introduction to quantum mechanical system control
(2006)- et al.
Parametrizing quantum states and channels
Quantum Information Processing
(2003) - et al.
Optimal control of two-level quantum systems
IEEE Transactions on Automation Control
(2001)
Feedback control of quantum systems using continuous state estimation
Physical Review A
Quantum Kalman filtering and the Heisenberg limit for atomic magnetometry
Physical Review Letters
Cited by (173)
Lyapunov control of finite-dimensional quantum systems based on bi-objective quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm
2023, Journal of the Franklin InstituteGlobal exponential stabilization of quantum spin-[Formula Presented] systems via improved feedback control
2023, Journal of the Franklin InstituteMeasurement-Based Control for Minimizing Energy Functions in Quantum Systems
2023, IFAC-PapersOnLineNon-Markovian quantum Hadamard gate preparation in a hybrid bath: A Lyapunov approach
2023, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsEnergy control in a quantum oscillator using coherent control and engineered environment
2022, Chaos, Solitons and FractalsFeedback exponential stabilization of stochastic quantum systems based on state space division
2022, Results in Physics
Sen Kuang was born in Xinye County, Henan Province, PR China in 1976. He received a B.S. degree in Industrial Automation from Henan Polytechnic University in 1999. Then he worked in the Hebi Coal Mine Bureau. He received an M.S. degree in Control Theory and Control Engineering from Henan Polytechnic University in 2003. Now he is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Science and Technology of China. His current research interests include quantum feedback control and its state estimation, and quantum optimal control.
Shuang Cong was born in Hefei, PR China in 1961. She received a B.S. degree in Automatic Control from Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics in 1982, and a Ph.D. degree in System Engineering from the University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy, in 1995. She is currently a professor in the Department of Automation at the University of Science and Technology of China. Her research interests include advanced control strategies for motion control, fuzzy logic control, neural networks design and applications, robotic coordination control, and quantum system control.
- ☆
This paper was not presented at any IFAC meeting. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Yong-Yan Cao under the direction of Editor Mituhiko Araki.