An integrated fuzzy MCDM based approach for robot selection considering objective and subjective criteria
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Robots are very powerful elements of today's industry and are defined as automatically controlled, reprogrammable, multipurpose manipulators programmable in three or more axes [1]. The recent advancement in automation field has lead to increased usage of robots with distinct capabilities, features and specifications. A company's competitiveness in terms of the productivity of its facilities and quality of its products will be adversely affected by improper selection of robots [2], [3]. The determination of the most appropriate robot considering multiple conflicting qualitative and quantitative criteria has been a difficult task for the decision makers. Literature reveals that multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, production system performance optimization models, computer-assisted models and a general category of solutions are employed in robot selection process [4], [5], [6]. Among these models, MCDM is the most common method for ranking robots and production system performance optimization models are rarely used [5], [6]. Hence, the methodologies for robot selection are divided into three broad categories: (a) MCDM, (b) integrated approaches, and (c) a general category of solutions.
Various MCDM methods reported in the literature for robot selection process are: AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution), VIKOR (VIsekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje), ELECTRE II (ELimination and Et Choice Translating REality), PROMETHEE II (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation) and DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis). Due to vagueness in the data and ambiguity in decision-making process, fuzzy set theory has been incorporated into MCDM techniques by many researchers for robot selection problem. The selection criteria and the techniques considered by various researchers are presented in Table 1. Among these techniques, TOPSIS and VIKOR methods seemed to be more appropriate for solving the robot selection problem because they have capability to deal with each kind of judgment criteria, having clarity of results and easiness to deal with attributes and decision options [12].
In the integrated approach category, one or more techniques are integrated or combined to select robot for various applications. Table 2 provides the list of works related to integrated approach category along with their selection criteria. The general category of robot selection models includes statistical models, mathematical models and soft computing based models. Table 3 provides the list of works related to general solution category along with their selection criteria. From all the approaches, various criteria considered for selecting a robot for a particular application includes: load capacity, repeatability, horizontal and vertical reach, velocity or speed of travel, degree of freedom, positioning accuracy, maximum tip speed, memory capacity, manipulator reach, velocity ratio, purchase cost, repeatability error, warranty period, vendor's service quality, programming flexibility, man–machine interface, stability, compliance, service contract, drive system, geometrical dexterity, path measuring system, robot size, material of robot, weight of robot, initial operating cost and life-expectancy. The literature review demonstrates that the majority of researchers have considered the selection of proper criteria as important, but they did not justify their selection or analyze their suitability [4]. Hence, a proper methodology to justify the selection of objective and subjective factors has to be incorporated in the decision making process. Fuzzy Delphi Method can be employed to overcome this limitation.
The criteria which are defined in tangible terms are classified as quantitative or objective criteria e.g. cost, load capacity etc. and the criteria that have qualitative definitions i.e., they are unable to be defined in tangible terms are classified as qualitative or subjective criteria e.g. programming flexibility, stability, etc. The classification of criteria into objective and subjective for robot selection is done by only few authors [11], [3], [32], [37]. Even though few researchers have considered this type of classification, weights given to objective and subjective factors are equal. But in real-life applications, the weights for quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria will be different. Hence in the developed approach, this limitation is taken care off.
Therefore, this paper aims to develop a new decision making method which takes care of suitable objective and subjective criteria selection and proper evaluation of the alternatives treating it as a MCDM problem. The proposed approach integrates Fuzzy Delphi Method, Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy TOPSIS/Fuzzy VIKOR and Brown–Gibson model. In order to do so, the remainder of this paper is set out as follows. The proposed methodology is described in Section 2. In Section 3, selection of robot for educational purpose is used to illustrate the proposed method. Conclusions are presented in Section 4.
Section snippets
Proposed methodology
A systematic procedure is proposed in Fig. 1 which incorporates five steps namely listing the objective and subjective factors, critical factors identification using FDM, criteria weights calculation using FAHP Method, ranking of alternatives using Fuzzy Modified TOPSIS/Fuzzy VIKOR method and selection index calculation using Brown–Gibson model. The stages in the proposed approach are explained in the following sections.
The case study – robot selection for educational purpose
Due to vast growth in automation field, educational institutions have started to implement “Robotics” course in under graduate and post graduate studies. A robot for teaching purpose has to be selected in the department of Mechatronics Engineering. Quotations from three leading companies are called for and these three robots will be referred as A1, A2 and A3. From these three alternatives, the best Robot has to be selected. The following sections will explain the application of proposed
Conclusions
Robots are preferred in many industrial applications to perform repetitious, difficult and hazardous tasks with precision. Hence the course “Robotics” is gaining momentum among the graduates. In this paper, a new methodology to select a robot for teaching robotic course is proposed. Initially fifteen quantitative and seven qualitative factors are considered for robot selection. FDM is used to select the potential criteria for further process based on the decision makers’ opinion. Fuzzy AHP
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees who have contributed to enhancement of the technical contents of this paper.
References (45)
- et al.
Optimal selection of robots by using distance based approach method
Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
(2010) - et al.
Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences
Robot. Autonom. Syst.
(2011) - et al.
A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for robot selection
Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
(1993) Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection
J. Manuf. Syst.
(1997)- et al.
Multi-objective analysis of hospital delivery systems
Comput. Ind. Eng.
(2001) - et al.
Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot
Mech. Mach. Theory
(2004) - et al.
Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems
Comput. Ind. Eng.
(2007) Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(2008)- et al.
Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method
Appl. Math. Model.
(2011) - et al.
Soft computing based on new interval-valued fuzzy modified multi-criteria decision-making method
Appl. Soft Comput.
(2013)
Robot selection by using generalized interval-valued fuzzy numbers with TOPSIS
Appl. Soft Comput.
Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods
Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection
Expert Syst. Appl.
A cone-ratio DEA approach for AMT justification
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
Decision-making and performance measurement models with application to robot selection
Comput. Ind. Eng.
A fuzzy digraph method for robot evaluation and selection
Expert Syst. Appl.
An integrated multiple criteria decision making model applying axiomatic fuzzy set theory
Appl. Math. Model.
Selection, identification and comparison of industrial robots using digraph and matrix methods
Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment
Expert Syst. Appl.
Introduction to Robotics – Analysis, Control, Applications
Development of a decision support system for robot selection
Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf.
Cited by (107)
FAQT-2: A customer-oriented method for MCDM with statistical verification applied to industrial robot selection
2023, Expert Systems with ApplicationsAdaptation of the MIVES method for the strategic selection of new technologies at an R&D centre. Focus on the manufacturing sector
2022, TechnovationCitation Excerpt :Their versatility is evident in their application in such areas as energy; environment and sustainability; strategic management; production management; supply chain management; quality management; project management; security and risk management; information management; technology and manufacturing systems; software and hardware development; tourism management; education; and public administration programs (Emrouznejad and Marra, 2017; Mardani et al., 2015; Stojčić et al., 2019). The application of these methods for the evaluation and selection of technologies, mainly in industrial scenarios, varies from the selection of very particular technologies (Büyüközkan et al., 2018; Hung and Lee, 2016; Shen et al., 2011) and technological equipment (Athawale and Chakraborty, 2011; Parameshwaran et al., 2015) to wider strategic decisions on technology and business, in such business fields as suppliers and partnerships (Farooq and Obrien, 2012; Fazli et al., 2015; Sarkis and Talluri, 2004), strategy, and technology portfolio decision-making (Jolly, 2003; Kleindorfer and Partovi, 1990; Shen et al., 2010; Van Wyk, 2010). R&D Centers are playing a key role in the chain of technological developments.