News & Comment

Putative integral membrane SRP receptors

Many integral membrane proteins are produced by translocon-associated ribosomes. The assembly of ribosomes translating membrane proteins on the translocons is mediated by a conserved system, composed of the signal recognition particle and its receptor (FtsY in Escherichia coli). FtsY is a peripheral membrane protein, and its role late during membrane protein targeting involves interactions with the translocon. However, earlier stages in the pathway have remained obscure, namely, how FtsY targets the membrane in vivo and where it initially docks. Our previous studies have demonstrated co-translational membrane-targeting of FtsY translation intermediates and identified a nascent FtsY targeting-peptide. Here, in a set of in vivo experiments, we utilized tightly stalled FtsY translation intermediates, pull-down assays and site-directed cross-linking, which revealed FtsY-nascent chain-associated proteins in the cytosol and on the membrane. Our results demonstrate interactions between the FtsY-translating ribosomes and cytosolic chaperones, which are followed by directly docking on the translocon. In support of this conclusion, we show that translocon over-expression increases dramatically the amount of membrane associated FtsY-translating ribosomes. The co-translational contacts of the FtsY nascent chains with the translocon differ from its post-translational contacts, suggesting a major structural maturation process. The identified interactions led us to propose a model for how FtsY may target the membrane co-translationally. On top of our past observations, the current results may add another tier to the hypothesis that FtsY acts stoichiometrically in targeting ribosomes to the membrane in a constitutive manner.

Integral membrane proteins (IMPs) are usually synthesized by membrane-bound ribosomes, and this process requires proper localization of ribosomes and IMP-encoding transcripts. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of the pathway has not yet been fully established in vivo. The prevailing hypothesis is that ribosomes and transcripts are delivered to the membrane together during IMP translation by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor. Here, I discuss an alternative hypothesis that posits that ribosomes and transcripts are targeted separately. Ribosome targeting to the membrane might be mediated by the SRP receptor, rather than by SRP, and IMP-encoding transcripts might be targeted to the membrane in a translation-independent manner. According to this scenario, the SRP executes its essential function on the membrane at a later stage of the targeting pathway.

All living cells have co-translational pathways for targeting membrane proteins. Co-translation pathways for secretory proteins also exist but mostly in eukaryotes. Unlike secretory proteins, the biosynthetic pathway of most membrane proteins is conserved through evolution and these proteins are usually synthesized by membrane-bound ribosomes. Translation on the membrane requires that both the ribosomes and the mRNAs be properly localized. Theoretically, this can be achieved by several means. (i) The current view is that the targeting of cytosolic mRNA-ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) to the membrane is initiated by information in the emerging hydrophobic nascent polypeptides. (ii) The alternative model suggests that ribosomes may be targeted to the membrane also constitutively, whereas the appropriate mRNAs may be carried on small ribosomal subunits or targeted by other cellular factors to the membrane-bound ribosomes. Importantly, the available experimental data do not rule out the possibility that cells may also utilize both pathways in parallel. In any case, it is well documented that a major player in the targeting pathway is the signal recognition particle (SRP) system composed of the SRP and its receptor (SR). Although the functional core of the SRP system is evolutionarily conserved, its composition and biological practice come with different flavors in various organisms. This review is dedicated mainly to the Escherichia (E.) coli SRP, where the biochemical and structural properties of components of the SRP system have been relatively characterized, yielding essential information about various aspects of the pathway. In addition, several cellular interactions of the SRP and its receptor have been described in E. coli, providing insights into their spatial function. Collectively, these in vitro studies have led to the current view of the targeting pathway [see (i) above]. Interestingly, however, in vivo studies of the role of the SRP and its receptor, with emphasis on the temporal progress of the pathway, elicited an alternative hypothesis [see (ii) above]. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Protein translocation across or insertion into membranes.

The mechanism underlying the interaction of the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle receptor FtsY with the cytoplasmic membrane has been studied in detail. Recently, we proposed that FtsY requires functional interaction with inner membrane lipids at a late stage of the signal recognition particle pathway. In addition, an essential lipid-binding α-helix was identified in FtsY of various origins. Theoretical considerations and in vitro studies have suggested that it interacts with acidic lipids, but this notion is not yet fully supported by in vivo experimental evidence. Here, we present an unbiased genetic clue, obtained by serendipity, supporting the involvement of acidic lipids. Utilizing a dominant negative mutant of FtsY (termed NG), which is defective in its functional interaction with lipids, we screened for E. coli genes that suppress the negative dominant phenotype. In addition to several unrelated phenotype-suppressor genes, we identified pgsA, which encodes the enzyme phosphatidylglycerophosphate synthase (PgsA). PgsA is an integral membrane protein that catalyzes the committed step to acidic phospholipid synthesis, and we show that its overexpression increases the contents of cardiolipin and phosphatidylglycerol. Remarkably, expression of PgsA also stabilizes NG and restores its biological function. Collectively, our results strongly support the notion that FtsY functionally interacts with acidic lipids.

Protein targeting by the bacterial signal recognition particle requires the specific interaction of the signal recognition particle (SRP)–ribosome–nascent chain complex with FtsY, the bacterial SRP receptor. Although FtsY in Escherichia coli lacks a transmembrane domain, the membrane-bound FtsY displays many features of an integral membrane protein. Our data reveal that it is the cooperative action of two lipid-binding helices that allows this unusually strong membrane contact. Helix I comprises the first 14 amino acids of FtsY and the second is located at the interface between the A- and the N-domain of FtsY. We show by site-directed cross-linking and binding assays that both helices bind to negatively charged phospholipids, with a preference for phosphatidyl glycerol. Despite the strong lipid binding, helix I does not seem to be completely inserted into the lipid phase, but appears to be oriented parallel with the membrane surface. The two helices together with the connecting linker constitute an independently folded domain, which maintains its lipid binding even in the absence of the conserved NG-core of FtsY. In summary, our data reveal that the two consecutive lipid-binding helices of FtsY can provide a membrane contact that does not differ significantly in stability from that provided by a transmembrane domain. This explains why the bacterial SRP receptor does not require an integral β-subunit for membrane binding.

Different from eukaryotes, the bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor lacks a membrane-tethering SRP receptor (SR) β subunit and is composed of only the SRα homologue FtsY. FtsY is a modular protein composed of three domains. The N- and G-domains of FtsY are highly similar to the corresponding domains of Ffh/SRP54 and SRα and constitute the essential core of FtsY. In contrast, the weakly conserved N-terminal A-domain does not seem to be essential, and its exact function is unknown. Our data show that a 14-amino-acid-long positively charged region at the N-terminus of the A-domain is involved in stabilizing the FtsY–SecYEG interaction. Mutant analyses reveal that the positively charged residues are crucial for this function, and we propose that the 14-amino-acid region serves as a transient lipid anchor. In its absence, the activity of FtsY to support cotranslational integration is reduced to about 50%. Strikingly, in vivo, a truncated isoform of FtsY that lacks exactly these first 14 amino acids exists. Different from full-length FtsY, which primarily cofractionates with the membrane, the N-terminally truncated isoform is primarily present in the soluble fraction. Mutating the conserved glycine residue at position 14 prevents the formation of the truncated isoform and impairs the activity of FtsY in cotranslational targeting. These data suggest that membrane binding and function of FtsY are in part regulated by proteolytic cleavage of the conserved 14-amino-acid motif.