Short communication
Positively charged liposome functions as an efficient immunoadjuvant in inducing cell-mediated immune response to soluble proteins

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00097-8Get rights and content

Abstract

In order to design an optimized liposome immunoadjuvant for inducing cell-mediated immune response against soluble proteinaceous antigens, we investigated the effect of liposomal surface charge on the immunoadjuvant action. Positively charged liposomes containing soluble antigens functioned as a more potent inducer of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and delayed type hypersensitivity response than negatively charged and neutral liposomes containing the same concentrations of antigens. To clarify the reason of the differential immune response, we examined the delivery of soluble proteins by the liposomes into the cytoplasm of macrophages, using fragment A of diphtheria toxin (DTA) as a marker. We found that positively charged liposomes encapsulating DTA are cytotoxic to macrophages, while empty positively charged liposomes, DTA in negatively charged and neutral liposomes are not. Consistent with this, only macrophages pulsed with OVA in positively charged liposomes could significantly stimulate OVA-specific, class I MHC-restricted T cell hybridoma. These results suggest that the positively charged liposomes can deliver proteinaceous antigens efficiently into the cytoplasm of the macrophages/antigen-presenting cells, where the antigens are processed to be presented by class I MHC molecules to induce the cell-mediated immune response. Possible development of the safe and effective vaccine is discussed.

Introduction

Much evidence suggests that effective protection against such pathogens as human immunodeficiency virus, Leishmania major and Mycobacterium leprae requires cell-mediated immunity, including DTH and CTL responses, rather than antibody-mediated immunity [1], [2], [3]. Therefore, the candidate vaccine against these pathogens must be able to induce cell-mediated immunity quite efficiently. Although live vaccines can satisfy this criterion, development of attenuated vaccines against these microorganism are not practical because of their strong pathogenicity.

Non-live vaccines, including subunit vaccines that consist of the recombinant proteins or synthetic peptide, cannot induce strong cell-mediated immunity in general, although they are potentially much safer than the live vaccine. So non-live vaccines may require potent immunoadjuvants for effective antigen-specific immunization. A key point in inducing effective cell-mediated immune responses by using an immunoadjuvant is how to efficiently stimulate the processing and presentation of antigens to the immune system. Thus, a critical target of vaccines for enhancing cell-mediated immune responses is the antigen-presenting cell (APC). In support of this idea, it was reported recently that APC primed with various antigens in vitro can induce potent antigen-specific cell-mediated immune response after administration in naive mice [4], [5], [6], [7]. Therefore, targeting and delivery of antigenic molecules to APCs in vivo with an appropriate adjuvant will be necessary to success in inducing cell-mediated immunity.

Positively charged carriers are suitable for this purpose, because they are taken up preferentially by phagocytotic cells such as macrophages which are one of the APC populations [8], [9], [10]. In this article, we considered liposome to be the candidate safe adjuvant and demonstrated that the soluble antigens can induce cell-mediated immunity quite efficiently in vivo with the help of positively charged liposomes. We also found that the ability of various liposomes to support cell-mediated immunity against soluble antigens is correlated with the ability of these liposomes to deliver the soluble protein to APCs. These results indicate that the positive charge on the surface of liposomes represents an important factor for enhancing their immunoadjuvancy in the induction of antigen-specific cell-mediated immune responses.

Section snippets

Materials

Egg phosphatidylcholine (PC) and l-α-dimyristoyl phosphatidic acid (PA) were purchased from Nippon Oil & Fats. Cholesterol (Chol), stearylamine (SA), ovalbumin (OVA) and β-galactosidase (β-gal) were purchased from Sigma. Thioglycollate medium and alum were purchased from Nissui Pharmaceutical and Pierce Chemical, respectively. Fragment A of diphtheria toxin (DTA) was prepared as described previously [11].

Mice and cell lines

Female BALB/c, C57BL/6 and ddY mice (6–10 week old) were purchased from SLC. P815 is a

Results and discussion

OVA in variously charged liposomes was subcutaneously inoculated into ddY mice, and footpad swelling responses were examined after the challenge with heat-aggregated OVA. Fig. 1 shows the footpad swelling responses at 24 and 48 h postchallenge. At 24 h postchallenge, the priming with soluble OVA alone led to no significant DTH response against OVA. In contrast, OVA in positively charged liposomes induced marked response (P<0.05). The response was also observed in mice injected with OVA

Conclusion

Liposomes are potentially useful as not only drug carriers to deliver pharmacologically active agents into cells [11], [29], [30] but also immunoadjuvants and vaccine carriers [31]. A number of approaches [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38] have been made to improve the immunoadjuvant action of liposomes, including the modification of the structure of vesicles [34], [36], [37], [38] in the last two decades. However, additional devices and/or factors might have to be considered in an

Abbreviations

    APC

    antigen-presenting cell;

    β-gal

    β-galactosidase;

    CFA

    complete Freund’s adjuvant;

    Chol

    Cholesterol;

    CTL

    cytotoxic T lymphocyte;

    DTA

    fragment A of diphtheria toxin;

    DTH

    delayed type hypersensitivity;

    IL-2

    interleukin 2;

    MTT

    3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide;

    OVA

    ovalbumin;

    PA

    l-α-dimyristoyl phosphatidic acid;

    PC

    egg phosphatidylcholine;

    SA

    stearylamine

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Hans-Georg Rammensee (University of Tübingen, Tübingen) for P13.1 cells, Dr. Clifford V. Harding (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland) for CD8OVA cells, the Cancer Cell Repository, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer (Tohoku University, Sendai) for EL4 cells and Mr. Masato Fukui for excellent technical assistance. Additionally, this study was supported in part by Grants-in Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of

References (38)

  • K. Nishikawa et al.

    Scavenger receptor-mediated uptake and metabolism of lipid vesicles containing acidic phospholipids by mouse peritoneal macrophages

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1990)
  • T. Daemen et al.

    Liposomal phosphatidylserine inhibits tumor cytotoxicity of liver macrophages induced by muramyl dipeptide and lipopolysaccharide

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1996)
  • H. Mizuguchi et al.

    Intratumor administration of fusogenic liposomes containing fragment A of diphtheria toxin suppresses tumor growth

    Cancer Lett.

    (1996)
  • H. Mizuguchi et al.

    Efficient gene transfer into mammalian cells using fusogenic liposome

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1996)
  • C.R. Alving

    Liposomes as carriers of antigens and adjuvants

    J. Immunol. Methods

    (1991)
  • P.A. Bretscher et al.

    Establishment of stable, cell-mediated immunity that makes ‘susceptible’ mice resistant to Leishmania major

    Science

    (1992)
  • J. Shimizu et al.

    Induction of tumor-specific in vivo protective immunity by immunization with tumor antigen-pulsed antigen-presenting cells

    J. Immunol.

    (1989)
  • J.I. Mayordomo et al.

    Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells pulsed with synthetic tumor peptides elicit protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity

    Nat. Med.

    (1995)
  • F.J. Hsu et al.

    Vaccination of patients with B-cell lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed dendritic cells

    Nat. Med.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text