Elsevier

Urology

Volume 55, Issue 6, June 2000, Pages 852-855
Urology

Adult urology
Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single-institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality

This study was presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association Dallas, May 1999.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00619-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives. To compare postoperative morbidity and mortality in a concurrent and contemporary series of patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit versus orthotopic neobladder.

Methods. The data of 198 patients were reviewed, 117 with orthotopic reconstruction and 81 with ileal conduit during a 5-year time frame. Thirty-day morbidity, mortality, reoperative rates, and parameters associated with the surgical procedures were obtained from chart review.

Results. No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. The median operative time for the ileal conduit was 201 minutes (range 140 to 373), and for the orthotopic neobladder, it was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425). The median blood loss was 389 and 474 mL, respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 8 days for the ileal conduit group and 7 days for the orthotopic neobladder group. Diversion-related complications recognized within 30 days that ultimately required a return to the operating room occurred in 3.4% of those with a neobladder and 1.2% of those with an ileal conduit.

Conclusions. The orthotopic neobladder is a longer and technically more complex procedure than the ileal conduit procedure. However, no demonstrable difference in morbidity or perioperative complications were found between the two procedures in our review.

Section snippets

Material and methods

We reviewed 198 patients who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction during a 5-year period ending in March 1999. One hundred seventeen patients underwent orthotopic CUR (group 1) and 81 patients underwent ileal conduit diversion (group 2). In group 1, 97 patients were men, and 20 were women; in group 2, 48 patients were men, and 33 were women. All the patients in both groups underwent radical cystectomy for muscle invasive carcinoma of the bladder, rapidly recurring high-grade

Results

No perioperative or postoperative deaths occurred in either group. In group 1, the median operative time was 270 minutes (range 230 to 425) compared with 201 minutes (range 140 to 373) in group 2. The median blood loss in group 1 was 474 mL (range 150 to 1700) and 389 mL (range 100 to 1400) in group 2. Patients in group 1 who received an orthotopic neobladder had a median length of hospitalization of 7 days (range 5 to 28) compared with 8 days (range 5 to 60) for patients in group 2 who

Comment

In some patients, an orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy provides an improved quality of life compared with an ileal conduit.2, 3 Certain patients are highly motivated to avoid an abdominal stoma. The functional voiding outcome with the neobladder is excellent, and almost all our patients achieved total daytime control. Fifteen percent required no more than a single pad to remain dry at night.

Despite these advantages, there is a general perception among urologists that the ileal

Conclusions

The orthotopic neobladder is technically a more complex procedure than the ileal conduit and requires a longer operative time. In our study, this did not translate into any identifiable increase in perioperative morbidity. The duration of hospitalization after the two procedures was comparable. Complications requiring a return to the operating room occurred with equal frequency with both procedures. For properly motivated patients, the orthotopic neobladder can be offered as a procedure with no

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (88)

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Dr. Koch is currently at the Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana

View full text