Article
Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen stroke study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80567-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of stroke stratified according to both initial stroke severity and initial level of disability. Design: Prospective, consecutive, and community based. Setting: A stroke unit of a hospital in Denmark. This setting receives all acute stroke patients admitted from a well-defined catchment area of 239,886 inhabitants within the City of Copenhagen. Acute treatment as well as all stages of rehabilitation are cared for within the stroke unit regardless of age, stroke severity, and premorbid condition. Patients: 1197 patients with acute stroke. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was measured as death, discharge to nursing home, or to own home. Secondary outcome was measured as neurological deficits and functional disabilities after completed rehabilitation and again 6 months after stroke onset, using the Scandinavian Neurological Stroke Scale and the Barthel Index. Results: Stroke was initially very severe in 223 (19%) of the patients, severe in 171 (14%), moderate in 316 (26%), and mild in 487 (41%) patients. Two hundred and fifty (21%) patients died during hospital stay, 177 (15%) were discharged to nursing home, and 770 (64%) patients were discharged to their own home. After completed rehabilitation, 11% of survivors still had severe or very severe neurological deficits, 11% had moderate deficits, and 78% had no or only mild deficits; 20% were severely or very severely disabled, 8% were moderately disabled, 26% were mildly disabled, and 46% had no disability in activities of daily living. Detailed information on outcome stratified according to initial stroke severity/disability also is presented. Conclusions: This study provides a thorough description of the needs for stroke rehabilitation in the community and the amount of postrehabilitation disability in stroke survivors. For outcome prediction, the results can be used as a reliable tool for prognostication of the chances (or risks) of various outcomes in patients characterized by initial degree of stroke severity and/or functional disability using simple, reliable scores in the acute phase of stroke. However, the results should not be used as a guideline for selecting patients for rehabilitation in the acute phase because even the most severe cases regularly experience meaningful improvement during rehabilitation.

References (42)

  • PartridgeCJ et al.

    Recovery from physical disability after stroke: normal patterns as a basis for evaluation

    Lancet

    (1987)
  • LanghorneP et al.

    Do stroke units save lives?

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • JørgensenHS et al.

    Effect of blood pressure and diabetes on stroke in progression

    Lancet

    (1994)
  • McDowellFH et al.

    Improvement in motor performance in paretic and paralyzed extremities following nonembolic cerebral infarction

    Stroke

    (1972)
  • LehmannJF et al.

    Stroke rehabilitation: Outcome and prediction

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1975)
  • FeigensonJS et al.

    Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. analysis of 248 unscreened patients — medical and functional prognostic indicators

    Stroke

    (1977)
  • FeigensonJS et al.

    Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 2. comparison of 318 screened and 248 unscreened patients

    Stroke

    (1977)
  • GrangerCV et al.

    Stroke rehabilitation: Analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1979)
  • GarrawayWM et al.

    Management of acute stroke in the elderly: preliminary results of a controlled trial

    Br Med J

    (1980)
  • PrescottRJ et al.

    Predicting functional outcome following acute stroke using a standard clinical examination

    Stroke

    (1982)
  • HertanuJS et al.

    Stroke rehabilitation: correlation and prognostic value of computerized tomography and sequential functional assessments

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1984)
  • KotilaM et al.

    The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome

    Stroke

    (1984)
  • DombovyML et al.

    Disability and use of rehabilitation services following stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975–1979

    Stroke

    (1987)
  • WadeDT et al.

    Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1987)
  • RedingM et al.

    Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke: life table analysis approach

    Stroke

    (1988)
  • GrangerCV et al.

    The stroke rehabilitation outcome study—Part I: general description

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1988)
  • ShahS et al.

    Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation

    Stroke

    (1989)
  • LincolnNB et al.

    The accuracy of predictions about progress of patients on a stroke unit

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • ÅsbergKH et al.

    Early prognosis of stroke outcome by means of Katz index of activities of daily living

    Scand J Rehab Med

    (1991)
  • OlsenTS

    Outcome following occlusion of the middle cerebral artery

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (1991)
  • JørgensenHS et al.

    Silent infarction in acute stroke patients

  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by grants from The Danish Health Foundation, The Danish Heart Foundation, Ebba Celinders Foundation, and The Gangsted Foundation.

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text