Kinematic hardening rules with critical state of dynamic recovery, part I: formulation and basic features for ratchetting behavior

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(93)90042-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Kinematic hardening rules formulated in a hardening/dynamic recovery format are examined for simulating rachetting behavior. These rules, characterized by decomposition of the kinematic hardening variable into components, are based on the assumption that each component has a critical state for its dynamic recovery to be activated fully. Discussing their basic features, the authors show that they can predict much less accumulation of uniaxial and multiaxial ratchetting strains than the Armstrong and Frederick rule. Comparisons with multilayer and multisurface models are made also, resulting in a finding that the simple one in the present rules is similar to the multilayer model with total strain rate replaced by inelastic (or plastic) strain rate. Part II of this work deals with applications to experiments.

References (30)

  • N. Ohno et al.

    Kinematic Hardening Rules for Simulation of Ratchetting Behavior

    Mech. Mat.

    (1993)
  • J.F. Besseling

    A Theory of Elastic, Plastic and Creep Deformations of an Initially Isotropic Material Showing Anisotropic Strain Hardening, Creep Recovery and Secondary Creep

    ASME J. Appl. Mech.

    (1958)
  • P.J. Armstrong et al.

    A Mathematical Representation of the Multiaxial Bauschinger Effect

  • Z. Mrodot

    On the Description of Anisotropic Workhardening

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (1967)
  • K.C. Valanis

    A Theory of Viscoplasticity Without a Yield Surface: Part I—General Theory. Part II—Application to Mechanical Behavior of Metals

    Arch. Mech.

    (1971)
  • Cited by (939)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text