The identity and composition of the Euglenozoa

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80012-7Get rights and content

Summary

The taxon Euglenozoa was originally created to include the kinetoplastids and euglenids only. Subsequently, euglenozoan identity and/or affinities have been suggested for Diplonema, Stephanopogon, the Hemimastigophora and several even more poorly understood eukaryotes. The Euglenozoa have only ever been defined by circumscription and/or composition; attributes that change as taxa are added or removed.

This paper seeks to refine and stabilise the concept of the Euglenozoa by redefining it as a clade identified by synapomorphy. It is proposed that the Euglenozoa be identified by the character 'heteromorphic (tubular and parallel) lattice paraxonemal rods’. Applying this definition, the Euglenozoa currently consists of four subgroups; euglenids, kinetoplastids, diplonemids (i. e. Diplonema and Rhynchopus) and Postgaardi. The reasons for the exclusion of Stephanopogon and the Hemimastigophora are also presented.

References (75)

  • A.E. Montegut-Felkner et al.

    Phylogeny of Diplonema ambulatur (Larsen & Patterson). 1. Homologies of the flagellar apparatus

    Europ. J. Protistol.

    (1994)
  • A.E. Montegut-Felkner

    Phylogeny of Diplonema ambulator (Larsen & Patterson). 2. Homologies of the feeding apparatus

    Europ. J. Protistol.

    (1996)
  • D.J. Patterson et al.

    The ultrastructural identity of Stephanopogon apogon and the relatedness of the genus to other kinds of protists

    Europ. J. Protistol.

    (1988)
  • D.J. Patterson et al.

    Heterotrophic flagellates from coastal marine and hypersaline sediments in Western Australia

    Europ. J. Protistol.

    (1996)
  • E. Schnepf

    Light and electron microscopical observations in Rhynchopus coscinodiscivorus spec. nov., a colorless phagotrophic euglenozoon with concealed flagella

    Arch. Protistenkd.

    (1994)
  • A.G.B. Simpson et al.

    The ultrastructure and systematic position of the euglenozoon Postgaardi managerensis, Fenchel et al

    Arch. Protistenkd.

    (1997)
  • M.A. Sleigh

    Flagellar root maps allow speculative comparisons of root patterns and of their ontogeny

    BioSystems

    (1988)
  • R. Triemer

    Ultrastructure of mitosis in Diplonema ambulatorLarsen and Patterson (Euglenozoa)

    Europ. J. Protistol.

    (1992)
  • R. Triemer et al.

    Ultrastructure of Diplonema ambulatorLarsen & Patterson (Euglenozoa) and its relationship to Isonema

    Europ. J. Protistol.

    (1990)
  • P.L. Walne et al.

    A comparison of paraxonemal rods in the flagella of euglenoids and kinetoplastids

    Arch. Protistenkd.

    (1993)
  • R.A. Andersen et al.

    Terminology and nomenclature of the cytoskeletal elements associated with the flagellar/ciliary apparatus in protists

    Protoplasma

    (1991)
  • R.A. Andersen et al.

    Ultrastructure and 18S rRNA gene sequence for Pelagomonas calceolata gen. et sp. nov. and the description of a new algal class, the Pelagophyceae classis nov

    J. Phycol.

    (1993)
  • P.D. Ashlock

    Monophyly and associated terms

    Syst. Zool.

    (1971)
  • G. Brugerolle

    Des trichocystes chez les bodonidés, un caractère phylogénétique supplémentaire entre Kinetoplastida et Euglenida

    Protistologica

    (1985)
  • G. Brugerolle et al.

    Comparison et évolution des structures cellulaires chez plusieurs espèces de bodonidés et cryptobiidés appartenant aux genres Bodo, Cryptobia et Trypanoplasma (Kinetoplastida, Mastigophora)

    Protistologica

    (1979)
  • T. Cavalier-Smith

    The origin of eukaryote and archaebacterial cells

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1987)
  • T. Cavalier-Smith

    Zooflagellate phylogeny and classification

    Cytology

    (1995)
  • J.O. Corliss

    Taxonomic characterization of the suprafamilial groups in a revision of recently proposed schemes of classification for the phylum Ciliophora

    Trans. Amer. Micros. Soc.

    (1975)
  • J.O. Corliss

    The kingdoms of organisms — from a microscopist's point of view

    Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.

    (1986)
  • J.O. Corliss

    An interim utilitarian (“user-friendly”) hierarchical classification and characterization of the protists

    Acta Protozool.

    (1994)
  • N.S. Dawson et al.

    Structural characterization of Eutreptia (Euglenophyta). III. Flagellar structure and possible function of the paraxonemal rods

    Phycologia

    (1991)
  • J.O. Corliss

    Evolutionary trends in euglenoids

    Arch. Protistenkd.

    (1994)
  • M.A. Farmer

    An ultrastructural study of Lentomonas applanatum (Preisig) N. G. (Euglenida)

    J. Euk. Microbiol.

    (1994)
  • T. Fenchel et al.

    Microbial diversity and activity in a Danish fjord with anoxic deep water

    Ophelia

    (1995)
  • T. Fenchel et al.

    Percolomonas cosmopolitus (Ruinen) n. gen., a new type of filter feeding flagellate from marine plankton

    J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U. K.

    (1986)
  • I. Foissner et al.

    Revision of the family Spironemidae Doflein (Protista, Hemimastigophora), with description of two new species, Spironema terricola n. sp. and Stereonema geiseri, n. g., n. sp

    J. Euk. Microbiol.

    (1993)
  • K. Griessmann

    Über marine Flagellaten

    Arch. Protistenkd.

    (1913)
  • Cited by (96)

    • Morphological, Ultrastructural, Motility and Evolutionary Characterization of Two New Hemistasiidae Species

      2019, Protist
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on its morphological and ultrastructural features, this enigmatic marine protist has been initially considered to be a dinoflagellate (Pavillard 1922; Scherffel 1900), a euglenoid (Griessmann 1913) or, until recently, a kinetoplastid (Elbrächter et al. 1996; Senn 1911). However, a closer inspection of its ultrastructural features associated Hemistasia with another group within the phylum Euglenozoa, namely the diplonemids (Simpson 1997). Indeed, large mitochondrial cristae, a distinctive apical papilla, two parallel flagella that emerge from a deep subapical flagellar pocket, and an adjacent tubular feeding apparatus including vanes with fuzzy coats supported this inference (Elbrächter et al. 1996; Simpson and Roger 2004).

    • Phylogeny and Morphology of New Diplonemids from Japan

      2018, Protist
      Citation Excerpt :

      They belong to Euglenozoa and are thus related to ecologically important euglenids and economically and medically relevant kinetoplastids (Adl et al. 2012; Maslov et al. 1999; Moreira et al. 2001). For a long time, diplonemids were considered a small and rare group of flagellates with only three genera and less than a dozen species formally described (Massana 2011; Simpson 1997; Vickerman 2000; von der Heyden et al. 2004). However, they emerged from obscurity thanks to molecular analysis of hundreds of planktonic samples collected across the globe by several research expeditions (de Vargas et al. 2015; Lara et al. 2009).

    • Extreme Diversity of Diplonemid Eukaryotes in the Ocean

      2016, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Looking at their closest kins, represented by “classic” diplonemids, Hemistasia and the kinetoplastid flagellates, does not provide useful hints because those groups evolved a wide array of life strategies ranging from feeding on bacteria, predation, to parasitism and/or obligate symbiosis [7, 9, 25, 26]. The extreme species richness of the DSPD I diplonemids could stem from their diverse trophic interactions, ranging from bacterivory or parasitism, as seen in related kinetoplastids [7, 24], eukaryovory characteristic for the sister-branching Hemistasia [9], or even the so-far-overlooked grazing on viruses [27–30]. Recent results suggest that many species-rich planktonic groups (e.g., within the dinozoans and metazoans) are predominantly parasites [6].

    • Higher classification and phylogeny of Euglenozoa

      2016, European Journal of Protistology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Author’s address: Alastair G. B. Simpson, School of Biological Sciences, Building A08, University of Sydney, 2006, Australia; Ph. 61 2 9351 3536; Fax 61 2 9351 4119

    View full text